PLYMCO_PILGRIM
Gold Member
Thank you...i will read it and post after.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hi Chris. I read this quote from Ann Romney:
Another son came along 18 months later, although we waited four years to have the third, because Mitt was still in school and we had no income except the stock we were chipping away at."
I'm wondering if the Romney's used birth control or did Mitt not fuck Ann for 4 years?
I don't get it, people are bitching about poor women having bastard children left and right, and now we want to do away with contraception?
And even if I believed your assertions, it still does less damage than one pregnancy can do.
Have you apologized for accusing me of lying yet,
when you finally figured out for yourself that it was the truth?
Arizona legislators have advanced an unprecedented bill that would require women who wish to have their contraception covered by their health insurance plans to prove to their employers that they are taking it to treat medical conditions. The bill now moves to the state Senate for a full vote.
Apparently, the conservative agenda to take away a women's right choice now includes birth control.
Arizona Birth Control Bill Penalizes Women For Using Contraception For Non-Medical Reasons
They also just passed a bill which states conception begins two weeks before pregnancy, I shit you not.
Transvaginal probe included.
Good thing there's no war on women.
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/adopted/s.2036jud.pdf
Fuckerbitches.
"Smoked rocks."
I'm sorry. I cannot take you seriously. Have a wonderful day.
I don't see those things in this link http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/adopted/s.2036jud.pdf. Yes the require ultrasounds but not "trans vaginal" ultrasounds.
It also doesnt say that conception begins two weeks prior to pregnancy....i read thouroughly until about page 6 and started skimming so if I missed it point it out but I think whomever told you those 2 things about the bill were being dishonest.
Correct me if I am wrong, but don't we have the FDA to regulate the so called "pill"? If that's so, then why then would we here in Arizona need a law that does the same to people here who wish to take other than for a moral issue that some might have with it ? If thats the case, then don't take it. and please pay attention to the whats really important here in Arizona and thats the economy here.
I don't see those things in this link http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/adopted/s.2036jud.pdf. Yes the require ultrasounds but not "trans vaginal" ultrasounds.
It also doesnt say that conception begins two weeks prior to pregnancy....i read thouroughly until about page 6 and started skimming so if I missed it point it out but I think whomever told you those 2 things about the bill were being dishonest.
And on the ultrasound, it just says it must be on site, presumably in case of complications. It says nothing of use.
BDBoop was just lying. She took a blurb she read on a hate site, regarding the section of a Virginia bill, long since removed, and claimed it was part of the Arizona legislation - which is really nothing more than a public health bill.
Correct me if I am wrong, but don't we have the FDA to regulate the so called "pill"? If that's so, then why then would we here in Arizona need a law that does the same to people here who wish to take other than for a moral issue that some might have with it ? If thats the case, then don't take it. and please pay attention to the whats really important here in Arizona and thats the economy here.
What the hell are you yapping about?
Catch up on what the subject is, then start spewing your partisan bullshit.
I don't see those things in this link http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/adopted/s.2036jud.pdf. Yes the require ultrasounds but not "trans vaginal" ultrasounds.
It also doesnt say that conception begins two weeks prior to pregnancy....i read thouroughly until about page 6 and started skimming so if I missed it point it out but I think whomever told you those 2 things about the bill were being dishonest.
And on the ultrasound, it just says it must be on site, presumably in case of complications. It says nothing of use.
BDBoop was just lying. She took a blurb she read on a hate site, regarding the section of a Virginia bill, long since removed, and claimed it was part of the Arizona legislation - which is really nothing more than a public health bill.
That arizon bill is actually good for people who want abortions....it ensures that there are laws to protect such patients and make sure they have modern, clean, private, and safe facilities.
Because there weren't before?
What is so wrong with wanting to protect the 1st amendment on Religious rights? This is exactly why we have the 1st amendment.
That is what some of the bill is about.
If you take contraception for medical reasons your health care insurance will pay for it.
If you use birth control to prevent pregnancy then you pay for yourself or get it from any clinic that pays for for it. Just about anyone can afford 9 dollars a month for their own birth control.
Title Ten pays for contraception for anyone who is poor.