You mean the ones that the 1-term orange fuckup prevented?
I mean if you are going to have an "investigation" into the January 6th break in, you might want to look at all aspects of what went wrong that day. Does that make sense or are you too wasted on the Kool-Aid to even understand what I'm saying?
No, I'm sure what the president did the limit the police, national guard and other law enforcement that day will come to light.
Security failures don’t absolve the rioters and their enablers of the crimes committed that day.
Inflation is temporary and not President Biden's doing.
They do when the lack of security was designed to help purposefully spur on that behavior.
Any Republican in the House in 2023 who doesn't support all of those situations being investigated and made public, need to be removed immediately.
You can be as "sure" as you like but the facts are stubborn. He offered thousands of guardsmen, the Dems rejected it. That'd be Nancy and Bowser. Your little star chamber is an abject failure and November is only 4 months away. Your party is going to be eviscerated and Trump will have had NOTHING to do with that. It's ALL ON DEMOCRATS.
Your Shutzstaffel has rounded up over 800 people who were there that day. Many of them were identified by the exact same geo-tracking that was used in 2000 Mules. You know, that "unreliable" tracking? Most of those citizens were arrested and charged with misdemeanors like trespassing. The few who actually became violent and destroyed property, beat cops, or made threats, are being held to a higher standard of punishment than ANY BLM/ANTIFA terrorist from 2020.
Prove? The testimony of Kash Patel on the issue is enough for most unbiased people. I have no interest in making a case for you to shit on. I don't CARE what you believe. People like yourself who will hang on to the lies in the face of evidence have no desire to learn the truth.
Kash Patel? He was acting defense secretary at the time of the J6 insurrection and the former 1-term president's lackey. What do you think he can offer?
thepostmillennial.com
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/MTG4EW5GDNJAXCX4DRVVVKOMSA.jpg)
www.reuters.com
www.washingtonexaminer.com
I'd suggest reading the Reuters article first.Oh, and here is a couple of sources for anyone interested in the truth:
WATCH: Trump offered DC ‘thousands of National Guard’ troops 2 days before Capitol riot—and was denied
“We had offered the Capitol Police, and Mayor Bowser of Washington, DC, thousands of National Guardsmen and women, two days before January 6. And they turned us down,” a former Pentagon official said.
Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally
President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.
Trump says he told the Pentagon 10,000 National Guard troops would be needed Jan. 6 but was ignored - Washington Examiner
YES, TRUMP DID CALL FOR 10,000 GUARD TROOPS FOR JAN 6: In some of his first public remarks since losing the November election, former President Donald Trump told Fox News that he warned the Pentagon “days before” that it was not ready for the crowd of Trump backers who would converge on...
As soon as the gavel changes hands next January, Republicans who want to stay in their jobs better get busy with subpoenas and depositions of those in the chain of command responsible for security that day. Hacks like Otto will never admit being wrong but the people deserve the facts and if the indications are that the Ds set this up, people need to know so they can prepare for coming events.
Just because there were some inside that were sympathetic to the rioters, doesn’t equate to their being a purposeful plan to let people in. Logic much?
