Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He most certainly did exactly that .Hahah he never did that.
But he can certainly call state offficials if he wanted
So you always talk out of both sides of your mouth?When was he convict of being a traitor? Did He not have due process rights? Why is the president allowed to make that determination on his own?
I have no issue with Obama being immune from prosecution for that extrajudicial killing
your lie has already been debunked,,He most certainly did exactly that .
This was not a call to say” Hi how ya doing”
It was a cal pressuring Lee room officials to change vote counts.
It’s on tape.
And as noted, Trump’s DOJ had told him thee were no improprieties
I never said he was convicted. He had his chance to defend himself in court but choose to hide in Yemen, thinking he was out of our reach while continuing to poise a threat to soft targets of American women and children.When was he convict of being a traitor? Did He not have due process rights? Why is the president allowed to make that determination on his own?
I have no issue with Obama being immune from prosecution for that extrajudicial killing
he should be prosecuted for bombing american civilians in a country we arent at war with,, and without due processSo you always talk out of both sides of your mouth?
Oh wait. You do.
Al Awiki was an Al Queda leader. You want to prosecute Obama for that go right ahead. It’ll go nowhere
Not because Obama had immunity but because that was a justifiable act
what about his son and other civilians that died??I never said he was convicted. He had his chance to defend himself in court but choose to hide in Yemen, thinking he was out of our reach while continuing to poise a threat to soft targets of American women and children.
Have at it.he should be prosecuted for bombing american civilians in a country we arent at war with,, and without due process
When you hang around with Al Queda you risk thatwhat about his son and other civilians that died??
so youre OK with potus murdering americans without due process but not paying off a hooker,,When you hang around with Al Queda you risk that
Disputed is not debunked stupid.your lie has already been debunked,,
You against killing Osama Bin Ladin?so youre OK with potus murdering americans without due process but not paying off a hooker,,
your morals are a little twisted,,
no its been debunked,, hundreds of times,,Disputed is not debunked stupid.
It’s fact that Barr told him the election was not fraudulent.
And the phone call is also fact
I guess thats why pedophilia is being defended by so many on the left,,You against killing Osama Bin Ladin?
"Our response involves far more than instant retaliation and isolated strikes. Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have ever seen. It may include dramatic strikes, visible on TV, and covert operations, secret even in success. We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or no rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. (Applause.) From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.he should be prosecuted for bombing american civilians in a country we arent at war with,, and without due process
Here we go with this bullshit again.no its been debunked,, hundreds of times,,
I ask you about Osama Bin Laden and that’s your response?I guess thats why pedophilia is being defended by so many on the left,,
no morals or principles
you post where he pressured them??Here we go with this bullshit again.
Post that “debunking” with links
he has nothing to do with it so I wont play into your deflections,,I ask you about Osama Bin zladen and that’s your response?
Surrender accepted
His son was not targeted like he was. You hang out with Al Qaeda operatives in Yemen and you get stupid prizes.what about his son and other civilians that died??
.
Are the Conservative USSC Justices Not Looking to the Future... or are They?
Brett Kavanaugh’s 15-year-old law review could give the nation a clue at how he could rule in trump's immunity case. In his paper, “Kavanaugh didn't support blanket immunity and said prosecution could occur after a president's term,” which is what has happened at both the federal and state levels.
But if the conservative USSC Justices are looking to the future and planning to open the door to trump’s dictatorship, they must rule to protect trump from his current legal woes. However, that ruling cannot guarantee the same blanket immunity, as demanded by trump, to Biden for the remainder of his presidency. A perplexing problem for the conservative Justices.
The conservative Justices must also consider the unlimited power they would be guaranteeing the future dictator trump. Granting such unlimited presidential power, coupled with trump’s vindictive nature, the conservative Justices’ decision could jeopardize their own survival after January 20, 2025. This is the date trump’s revenge tour begins.
View attachment 939935
.
