Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
First, there is this that companies pressuring all 50 states to conform to the LGBT cult should consider....the real actual numbers of support vs the media-owned LGBT dispensed bullshit smoke and mirrors: A Poll Businesses Boycotting Laws Protecting Christians Might Want To Look At First.. Long story short, 90% of 100 people polled say they think it's important for a child to have both a mother and father. An opinion that cannot occupy the same gray matter as an opinion that "gay marriage is fine".
But there's more that occurred to me of late. A thought train building strength from this thread: Political Sharpshooter? A Tale of Two Rachael Maddows... Sex, Lies & Garbled Motive.. It's a thread that discusses how MSNBC's Rachael Maddow, having assisted the defamation or complete removal of several US Governors who disagreed with the LGBT cult values, all GOP except the one straight democrat Oregon Governor whose Lt. Gov is bisexual...(around the same time a prominent LGBT activist was arrested for sodomizing a minor there...) might be practicing sedition.
Note the dates below:
Remember, Senior leaders in Oregon, blue state = democrats.
In short, my theory there says that since Maddow is essentially selectively ruining Governors one by one who disagree with her LGBT view, she is effectively erasing after-the-fact, the votes of the people who put those governors in Office KNOWING WHAT THEIR VIEWS WERE ON GAY MARRIAGE ETC. at the time they cast their votes. Maddow's "logic" for her attacks to circumvent the obvious is that "they ran on their marriage being perfect!". Which is false. They ran on traditional marriage, complete with its flaws and imperfections. And THAT is what the voters there understood and self-governed upon by electing him their leader.
BTW, I've not personally seen coverage on the Maddow Show about Terry Bean, prominent democrat fundraising gay activist sodomizing a child. I have heard hours of coverage on traffic jams, perks while in office and alleged extramarital affairs between adults laser targeted at various republican governors who coincidentally just made comments about being opposed to anything LGBT. One would think a prominent political figure sodomizing a child would get more priority on the Maddow show instead of those lesser offenses. But you know, agendas have their working rules..
Now on to boycotting companies and other commercial entities like the "can't carry a tune in a bucket" Bruce Springsteen... I'm thinking that the boycott against a sovereign state for following its own internal procedures and democratic processes in order to squelch or change those processes is a form of sedition. Especially if performed by entities outside that state. It takes on an onerous flavor: real tangible and painful pressure of a sovereign state to conform to outside influences. It's essentially blackmail: "You play along or you're going to suffer in real actual ways". That's illegal. It's a felony.
The entities doing such things aren't even shy about cloaking their protest: "we are going to make you hurt" they declare. A boycott was traditionally used to get attention. Many companies and their spokespeople have openly bragged about the economic damage to North Carolina and other states they are intent on inflicting until they 100% get their way without mention of negotiation. In fact, the LGBT cult is quite flagrant about their stance being completely non-negotiable.
But there's more that occurred to me of late. A thought train building strength from this thread: Political Sharpshooter? A Tale of Two Rachael Maddows... Sex, Lies & Garbled Motive.. It's a thread that discusses how MSNBC's Rachael Maddow, having assisted the defamation or complete removal of several US Governors who disagreed with the LGBT cult values, all GOP except the one straight democrat Oregon Governor whose Lt. Gov is bisexual...(around the same time a prominent LGBT activist was arrested for sodomizing a minor there...) might be practicing sedition.
Note the dates below:
Remember, Senior leaders in Oregon, blue state = democrats.
In short, my theory there says that since Maddow is essentially selectively ruining Governors one by one who disagree with her LGBT view, she is effectively erasing after-the-fact, the votes of the people who put those governors in Office KNOWING WHAT THEIR VIEWS WERE ON GAY MARRIAGE ETC. at the time they cast their votes. Maddow's "logic" for her attacks to circumvent the obvious is that "they ran on their marriage being perfect!". Which is false. They ran on traditional marriage, complete with its flaws and imperfections. And THAT is what the voters there understood and self-governed upon by electing him their leader.
BTW, I've not personally seen coverage on the Maddow Show about Terry Bean, prominent democrat fundraising gay activist sodomizing a child. I have heard hours of coverage on traffic jams, perks while in office and alleged extramarital affairs between adults laser targeted at various republican governors who coincidentally just made comments about being opposed to anything LGBT. One would think a prominent political figure sodomizing a child would get more priority on the Maddow show instead of those lesser offenses. But you know, agendas have their working rules..
Now on to boycotting companies and other commercial entities like the "can't carry a tune in a bucket" Bruce Springsteen... I'm thinking that the boycott against a sovereign state for following its own internal procedures and democratic processes in order to squelch or change those processes is a form of sedition. Especially if performed by entities outside that state. It takes on an onerous flavor: real tangible and painful pressure of a sovereign state to conform to outside influences. It's essentially blackmail: "You play along or you're going to suffer in real actual ways". That's illegal. It's a felony.
The entities doing such things aren't even shy about cloaking their protest: "we are going to make you hurt" they declare. A boycott was traditionally used to get attention. Many companies and their spokespeople have openly bragged about the economic damage to North Carolina and other states they are intent on inflicting until they 100% get their way without mention of negotiation. In fact, the LGBT cult is quite flagrant about their stance being completely non-negotiable.
Last edited:
