Are Blacks More Racist Than Whites? Most Americans Say Yes

[Correll]

.So t me play your game with you.

Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas. So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does provisions of white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

They did not extend the black right to vote for 25 years. They extended special protections for blacks, for 25 years.

There are no laws in place giving similar special protection to whites.

Thus, your question is idiotic.


A better question is, in 2018, do we really still need special protections for blacks.




[/UOTE]
Or is this another one you guys are to cowardly to answer so you'll call me a racist instead?[/QUOTE]

I answered it, and explained why your question was stupid. It is not the first time I answered it.

To this point we get cowardice from these racists. They want to pretend he 15th amendment as plowed.

No one said that. Yet you are calling whites racist based on a made up lie of yours.


That's a fine example of why we call you a racist. Because you call whites racist based on less than nothing.

Thy don't want to talk abut poll taxes, tests and things of that nature. Bloody Sunday is just a song by U2, those people did not get beat up for trying to register to vote. After all, there was the 15th amendment so this just couldn't have happened.

Are you really so stupid that you don't see that by asking the question the way you did, that YOU were the one that took all that OFF the table?

If you had been honest about what the 65 act did, then that would have been the issues discussed.

Punk ass lying bastards. Try another method.

YOu are the punk ass liar, as I have explained. Repeatedly.

So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does provisions of white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

See, by lying about what the act does, you take poll taxes and the like, off the table.


How could I reply to that, with anything about poll taxes and the like?

 

[IM2]

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

If you know that, then why did you refer to the "black right to vote"?

Because pretending that "voting rights had to be renewed" - otherwise known as IM2's BIG FAT LIE - serves his whining, crying victimhood rant far better than the truth would. He's made it very clear that he has no use for reality, because it might actually require him to get his own shit together, instead of letting him lie around, being useless and hate-filled, because "white people" are conspiring against him.

As if anyone cares about his existence enough to bother.

Let's face reality then woman. It wasn't called the Voting Rights Act for nothing. Nice try. .

Yes, let's face reality. God knows, it'll be a new experience for you.

The name of the law has NOTHING to do with which provisions of it that were being renewed. Was the entire law up for renewal? No? Then do NOT cite the ******* title at me in your lame attempt to pretend you didn't LIE LIKE A ******* DOG so that you can continue to slack the **** off and blame your utter failure as a human being on "white people" oppressing you. Let me state this clearly: you are not important enough for anyone to care that you exist, let alone to "oppress" you. And no one needs to bother, because you do a bang-up job of being a loser with no help from anyone.

You are a prime example of what I've always said: there's no point in hating people for their race. If you give them five seconds, they'll give you a much better reason.

.I hate no one for their race. You are the one lying. You need to quit repeating that silly racist meme of us blaming ****** for our failures.. I'm using you guys as test subjects to prove my research. In the end I am going to make examples out of people like you. Now answer the question.

So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does provisions of white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

 

[IM2]

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain "practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

The voting rights of blacks do not come up for renewal.


That is not nitpicking.


What he is trying to imply, not state openly, because then it can be easily refuted,

is that without special federal oversight, evil white racists would end black voting as per the Jim Crow South, of several generations ago.


What gets me, is that in saying that, he is utterly insulting the whites of this country, yet the libs are happy to just accept it.



Calling them "Cucks" is really making more and more sense to me.

I did not state that voting rights are coming up for renewal. Neither did he state that directly.

As usual, you looked for a reason to get your feelings hurt, and ASSume that "the entire white population was being insulted.

Oh, he didn't state that directly? Now YOU are a lying sack of shit, just like he is.

"Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas." Direct quote from him.

Tell me again that he "didn't state that directly". Go on, SAY it, liar.

Because that's what they did. But while you keep trying to discredit that, you refuse to answer this question:

So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does provisions of white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

 

[katsteve2012]

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain "practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

The voting rights of blacks do not come up for renewal.


That is not nitpicking.


What he is trying to imply, not state openly, because then it can be easily refuted,

is that without special federal oversight, evil white racists would end black voting as per the Jim Crow South, of several generations ago.


What gets me, is that in saying that, he is utterly insulting the whites of this country, yet the libs are happy to just accept it.



Calling them "Cucks" is really making more and more sense to me.

I am acutely aware of what most whi post here are "attempting to imply" in most threads.

Every reason for the provisions is crystal clear, and although they do not directly affect the core right of the vote, they are a component of the process of voting.

As for what he stated being "utterly insulting to the white people of this country", that is an overly sensitive reaction.

It is likely that when this legislation was signed into law, the majority of those expressing such outrage at being insulted were not even here, so such hypersensitivity is absurd.

As far as "cucks" go, Im not certain what its relationship to this thread is. Its a stupid expression.

Generally used by stupid people.

THe insult is not the law being signed in 1965.


THe insult is claiming that it is still needed today, as though the whites today are straining at the leash to bring back toll taxes and literacy tests.


That white libs see you blacks insulting them and still suck up to you, despite your obvious racist contempt, is them being "Cucks".

There was no insult against "the whites of today" Unless you are a collectivist.

 

[Cecilie1200]

1965 Voting Rights Provisions to Expire
1965 Voting Rights Provisions to Expire

Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas. So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

Or is this another one you guys are to cowardly to answer so you'll call me a racist instead?

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

1965 Voting Rights Provisions to Expire
1965 Voting Rights Provisions to Expire

Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas. So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

Or is this another one you guys are to cowardly to answer so you'll call me a racist instead?

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

"Nitpick and play semantics" = pointing out lies and deliberate misrepresentations.

"Racist" = anyone who refuses to cater to IM2's pity party.

That's your opinion. And it is my option to disagree.

What I notice is that IM2 makes certain statements that cause some who post here discomfort.

But, after close to 8 years of posting here, I see a distinct scenario that gets played out here like a daily rerun of an old show.

Numerous threads are posted here associating the VAST majority of the black population with criminality, unemployment, and in your own words "self pity".

I know enough about IM2 to know that he had a successful career, and has no reason for a so called "pity party", but the fact that he brings up history and the existence of racism that has gotten better in certain ways is viewed as a verbal assault on the entire white population. And he has never said "All White People" in any statement that I have read.

Conversely, I have seen numerous posts over the years here that do not just imply, but fkat out characterize the entire black population as mentally inferior criminals.

That being said, when certain people read into his comments as an "insult" to the entire race of white people, it is easy to question why they would be so defensive.

NOT "my opinion". FACT. You can disagree with facts all you like.

What I notice is that IM2 makes "certain statements" that are racist and offensive and LYING, and people are usually uncomfortable about such crass, low-class behavior. I also notice jackasses like you bending yourselves into pretzels to try to defend it and pretend he's not the load of rancid snake shit that he is.

"Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas."

If you defend that, you don't have the moral authority to say shit to me.

 

[IM2]

.So t me play your game with you.

Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas. So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does provisions of white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

They did not extend the black right to vote for 25 years. They extended special protections for blacks, for 25 years.

There are no laws in place giving similar special protection to whites.

Thus, your question is idiotic.


A better question is, in 2018, do we really still need special protections for blacks.




[/UOTE]
Or is this another one you guys are to cowardly to answer so you'll call me a racist instead?

I answered it, and explained why your question was stupid. It is not the first time I answered it.

To this point we get cowardice from these racists. They want to pretend he 15th amendment as plowed.

No one said that. Yet you are calling whites racist based on a made up lie of yours.


That's a fine example of why we call you a racist. Because you call whites racist based on less than nothing.

Thy don't want to talk abut poll taxes, tests and things of that nature. Bloody Sunday is just a song by U2, those people did not get beat up for trying to register to vote. After all, there was the 15th amendment so this just couldn't have happened.

Are you really so stupid that you don't see that by asking the question the way you did, that YOU were the one that took all that OFF the table?

If you had been honest about what the 65 act did, then that would have been the issues discussed.

Punk ass lying bastards. Try another method.

YOu are the punk ass liar, as I have explained. Repeatedly.

So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does provisions of white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

See, by lying about what the act does, you take poll taxes and the like, off the table.


How could I reply to that, with anything about poll taxes and the like?[/QUOTE]

Nothing is taken off he table, this is the excuse you use to not answer the question. You can't answer the question.

But we all know what the answer is.

 

[katsteve2012]

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain "practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

The voting rights of blacks do not come up for renewal.


That is not nitpicking.


What he is trying to imply, not state openly, because then it can be easily refuted,

is that without special federal oversight, evil white racists would end black voting as per the Jim Crow South, of several generations ago.


What gets me, is that in saying that, he is utterly insulting the whites of this country, yet the libs are happy to just accept it.



Calling them "Cucks" is really making more and more sense to me.

I did not state that voting rights are coming up for renewal. Neither did he state that directly.

As usual, you looked for a reason to get your feelings hurt, and ASSume that "the entire white population was being insulted.

Oh, he didn't state that directly? Now YOU are a lying sack of shit, just like he is.

"Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas." Direct quote from him.

Tell me again that he "didn't state that directly". Go on, SAY it, liar.

I will address your question, when you ask it in a civilized manner.

I don't normally engage in any dialouge with low class, foul mouthed females.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain "practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

The voting rights of blacks do not come up for renewal.


That is not nitpicking.


What he is trying to imply, not state openly, because then it can be easily refuted,

is that without special federal oversight, evil white racists would end black voting as per the Jim Crow South, of several generations ago.


What gets me, is that in saying that, he is utterly insulting the whites of this country, yet the libs are happy to just accept it.



Calling them "Cucks" is really making more and more sense to me.

I did not state that voting rights are coming up for renewal. Neither did he state that directly.

As usual, you looked for a reason to get your feelings hurt, and ASSume that "the entire white population was being insulted.

Oh, he didn't state that directly? Now YOU are a lying sack of shit, just like he is.

"Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas." Direct quote from him.

Tell me again that he "didn't state that directly". Go on, SAY it, liar.

Because that's what they did. But while you keep trying to discredit that, you refuse to answer this question:

So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does provisions of white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

I don't have to "keep trying to discredit that". I already did. NOW I'm just reminding everyone of the fact that YOU'RE A LYING SACK OF SHIT.

I don't answer questions based on lies, and I don't allow delusional, self-pitying racists to re-define reality to suit themselves.. Sorry, asshole. Stop being a liar, and maybe you'll earn the right to ask me questions.

Oh, hey, did I mention that YOU'RE A LIAR? Wouldn't want to forget that.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain "practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

The voting rights of blacks do not come up for renewal.


That is not nitpicking.


What he is trying to imply, not state openly, because then it can be easily refuted,

is that without special federal oversight, evil white racists would end black voting as per the Jim Crow South, of several generations ago.


What gets me, is that in saying that, he is utterly insulting the whites of this country, yet the libs are happy to just accept it.



Calling them "Cucks" is really making more and more sense to me.

I am acutely aware of what most whi post here are "attempting to imply" in most threads.

Every reason for the provisions is crystal clear, and although they do not directly affect the core right of the vote, they are a component of the process of voting.

As for what he stated being "utterly insulting to the white people of this country", that is an overly sensitive reaction.

It is likely that when this legislation was signed into law, the majority of those expressing such outrage at being insulted were not even here, so such hypersensitivity is absurd.

As far as "cucks" go, Im not certain what its relationship to this thread is. Its a stupid expression.

Generally used by stupid people.

THe insult is not the law being signed in 1965.


THe insult is claiming that it is still needed today, as though the whites today are straining at the leash to bring back toll taxes and literacy tests.


That white libs see you blacks insulting them and still suck up to you, despite your obvious racist contempt, is them being "Cucks".

There was no insult against "the whites of today" Unless you are a collectivist.

Riiiiiight. IM2 babbles on and on endlessly about the evils of "the whites of today" because HE'S a collectivist, but the problem is that WE are mysteriously and unexplainably viewing his insults as insults.

 

[katsteve2012]

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

"Nitpick and play semantics" = pointing out lies and deliberate misrepresentations.

"Racist" = anyone who refuses to cater to IM2's pity party.

That's your opinion. And it is my option to disagree.

What I notice is that IM2 makes certain statements that cause some who post here discomfort.

But, after close to 8 years of posting here, I see a distinct scenario that gets played out here like a daily rerun of an old show.

Numerous threads are posted here associating the VAST majority of the black population with criminality, unemployment, and in your own words "self pity".

I know enough about IM2 to know that he had a successful career, and has no reason for a so called "pity party", but the fact that he brings up history and the existence of racism that has gotten better in certain ways is viewed as a verbal assault on the entire white population. And he has never said "All White People" in any statement that I have read.

Conversely, I have seen numerous posts over the years here that do not just imply, but fkat out characterize the entire black population as mentally inferior criminals.

That being said, when certain people read into his comments as an "insult" to the entire race of white people, it is easy to question why they would be so defensive.

NOT "my opinion". FACT. You can disagree with facts all you like.

What I notice is that IM2 makes "certain statements" that are racist and offensive and LYING, and people are usually uncomfortable about such crass, low-class behavior. I also notice jackasses like you bending yourselves into pretzels to try to defend it and pretend he's not the load of rancid snake shit that he is.

"Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas."

If you defend that, you don't have the moral authority to say shit to me.

"Moral authority"? This is a public message board, and you are not anyone special.

No one has any authority here.

"FACT"? A fact is something that is proven scientifically or is a fact because it is history that has already happened. You have an "OPINION", and you do not express yourself very well......at all.

You have a serious problem. With an empty space between your ears, which makes for a complete lack of objectivity.

 

[katsteve2012]

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain "practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

The voting rights of blacks do not come up for renewal.


That is not nitpicking.


What he is trying to imply, not state openly, because then it can be easily refuted,

is that without special federal oversight, evil white racists would end black voting as per the Jim Crow South, of several generations ago.


What gets me, is that in saying that, he is utterly insulting the whites of this country, yet the libs are happy to just accept it.



Calling them "Cucks" is really making more and more sense to me.

I am acutely aware of what most whi post here are "attempting to imply" in most threads.

Every reason for the provisions is crystal clear, and although they do not directly affect the core right of the vote, they are a component of the process of voting.

As for what he stated being "utterly insulting to the white people of this country", that is an overly sensitive reaction.

It is likely that when this legislation was signed into law, the majority of those expressing such outrage at being insulted were not even here, so such hypersensitivity is absurd.

As far as "cucks" go, Im not certain what its relationship to this thread is. Its a stupid expression.

Generally used by stupid people.

THe insult is not the law being signed in 1965.


THe insult is claiming that it is still needed today, as though the whites today are straining at the leash to bring back toll taxes and literacy tests.


That white libs see you blacks insulting them and still suck up to you, despite your obvious racist contempt, is them being "Cucks".

There was no insult against "the whites of today" Unless you are a collectivist.

Riiiiiight. IM2 babbles on and on endlessly about the evils of "the whites of today" because HE'S a collectivist, but the problem is that WE are mysteriously and unexplainably viewing his insults as insults.

And? Maybe you should ask him what HE is really saying as opposed to assuming that anyone who reads and understands what he is saying is wrong.

 

[IM2]

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

The 1965 voting rights provisions is not "black people's right to vote".

Try to be less stupid.

Yeah we know Correll.

Don't try the talking about the 15th amendment son. We all know that amendment was not followed.

Try to be less stupid.

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

"Nitpick and play semantics" = pointing out lies and deliberate misrepresentations.

"Racist" = anyone who refuses to cater to IM2's pity party.

That's your opinion. And it is my option to disagree.

What I notice is that IM2 makes certain statements that cause some who post here discomfort.

But, after close to 8 years of posting here, I see a distinct scenario that gets played out here like a daily rerun of an old show.

Numerous threads are posted here associating the VAST majority of the black population with criminality, unemployment, and in your own words "self pity".

I know enough about IM2 to know that he had a successful career, and has no reason for a so called "pity party", but the fact that he brings up history and the existence of racism that has gotten better in certain ways is viewed as a verbal assault on the entire white population. And he has never said "All White People" in any statement that I have read.

Conversely, I have seen numerous posts over the years here that do not just imply, but fkat out characterize the entire black population as mentally inferior criminals.

That being said, when certain people read into his comments as an "insult" to the entire race of white people, it is easy to question why they would be so defensive.

NOT "my opinion". FACT. You can disagree with facts all you like.

What I notice is that IM2 makes "certain statements" that are racist and offensive and LYING, and people are usually uncomfortable about such crass, low-class behavior. I also notice jackasses like you bending yourselves into pretzels to try to defend it and pretend he's not the load of rancid snake shit that he is.

"Congress voted in 2006 to extend the black right to vote for 25 more yeas."

If you defend that, you don't have the moral authority to say shit to me.

I've made no such comments. If so you post one. Our right to vote was up for renewal in 2006. I understand you are dumb but of congress had decided to get rid of the provision that stopped poll taxes tests and other things, then our right to vote was very much in danger.

So can one of you good republican conservative non racist whites facing the same racism as blacks explain to me when does provisions of white peoples right to vote come before congress for renewal?

 

[katsteve2012]

Unbelievable. We all know that the "provisions" were to ensure that certain "practices and barriers that "affected" the overall right of people who were historically disenfranchised to vote were controlled.

Although the "provisions" were not the actual voting rights act, they were a component of ensuring that the "process" of voting was equal in areas where it had a history of inequality.

Certain racist assholes will nit pick and play semantics anyway possible in order to deflect.

The voting rights of blacks do not come up for renewal.


That is not nitpicking.


What he is trying to imply, not state openly, because then it can be easily refuted,

is that without special federal oversight, evil white racists would end black voting as per the Jim Crow South, of several generations ago.


What gets me, is that in saying that, he is utterly insulting the whites of this country, yet the libs are happy to just accept it.



Calling them "Cucks" is really making more and more sense to me.

I am acutely aware of what most whi post here are "attempting to imply" in most threads.

Every reason for the provisions is crystal clear, and although they do not directly affect the core right of the vote, they are a component of the process of voting.

As for what he stated being "utterly insulting to the white people of this country", that is an overly sensitive reaction.

It is likely that when this legislation was signed into law, the majority of those expressing such outrage at being insulted were not even here, so such hypersensitivity is absurd.

As far as "cucks" go, Im not certain what its relationship to this thread is. Its a stupid expression.

Generally used by stupid people.

THe insult is not the law being signed in 1965.


THe insult is claiming that it is still needed today, as though the whites today are straining at the leash to bring back toll taxes and literacy tests.


That white libs see you blacks insulting them and still suck up to you, despite your obvious racist contempt, is them being "Cucks".

There was no insult against "the whites of today" Unless you are a collectivist.

Riiiiiight. IM2 babbles on and on endlessly about the evils of "the whites of today" because HE'S a collectivist, but the problem is that WE are mysteriously and unexplainably viewing his insults as insults.

And if "YOU " are that easily insulted by something stated on an anonymous message board, and do not possess the mental acuity to determine if it applies directly to you, then it may be possible that your emotional maturity is questionable.

 

[Humorme]

I'm laughing at these racists in here lying about how much they don't think about race. There are over 4,000 threads in this section primarily by whits about race where they think about bring white.

And you participate on most of those threads because you are... I don't even have to say anything.

I've not participated in most of the threads. Again arguing against the racism of whites is not racism. Saying there are whites who are racists is not saying all whites are racist so that's not racism. Debunking/strongly rebuking what racists such as you and others in here say is not racism. Saying whites do not experience racism is not racism. Calling you out on your racism is not calling all whites racist.. You are a racist. We all know it.

Unless the white person agrees with you on every aspect of race, they are a racist. You are delusional and everybody knows that. Making false claims makes you a pathological liar and most of us know that.

Saying whites do not experience racism is pure idiocy. Therefore, you piss a lot of people off and keep them on these threads. You are my poster boy when people ask me why I don't think blacks should become citizens. If they all think like you, then it would be a colossal mistake. And what bothers me most about the situation is that there are people like you, spewing venomous hatred that a lot of blacks refuse to condemn. For that reason, I don't condemn the real white racists. And they don't like me!

I'm going to say something to you because I'm fed up with your racism. It is something I am not ashamed to say will make me hate you as an individual and pray that God will help me to forgive you after today, but I guess we cannot avoid this because I've always felt if I had to make this point, it would amount to groveling at the feet of black supremacists. But, before I write this next paragraph, know this: I don't need your validation or anyone elses. What I'm about to say is just to prove that you are a liar, racist and in this discussion only to demean people while talking out your ass.

You said about me, "You are a racist. We all know it." Do "we"? Again, my response is not intended to grovel at your feet like the person who says, I'm not a racist. My best friend, relative, etc. is black. This is being done to prove to every person here that you don't know what the Hell you're talking about; that you are wrong; and that if you don't issue an apology, it will be obvious who the real racist is.

My sister married a Lebanese and my uncle married a very dark Mexican lady. My sister and aunt have since passed, but my uncle will tell you that all of my family members felt more comfortable in my house than any of our other relatives. And one of my aunts is a Democrat!

When I first got into being a foster parent, it came about when an old lady came to me with a small boy whose mother was Honduran and his father Mexican. The parents, here without papers, left and abandoned their baby. He was with me through the most important years of his life. I tried to adopt him, but the mother finally got her excrement together and got custody of him back. His pictures are still all over my house.

As a foster parent, I've had to care for children of every race imaginable. Many times children need / want things above and beyond what .DFACS was willing to cover. I have no problem going into my own pocket and buying things just for a smile - just to see their eyes light up. Years ago a very young teen was here without papers, working a job and trying to eke out a living. When an amnesty period came around, I did the paperwork and helped him get his papers. My charge was merely telling him I expected him to become a good citizen. Today, he tells people I am his father. And, when I need things like my car fixed or something done around the house, he shows up without any hesitation.

Here was a guy that at 14, leaves his country. His father was killed when this boy was an infant. He had no education, didn't speak English, had no family support system, no papers, nothing. Yet he starts out in construction, working double shifts and ultimately going back to school. I went to his graduation, not realizing what he thought about me. He was telling people I was his dad. Today he owns his own garage. He thinks my small gestures put him where he is - and while I am grateful for that, he did it on his own.

On and on I could go with stories like this - or you can read about my many run ins with neo-Nazis on this board. But, IM2, you come here bitching every day about white racists. You pretend you can sniff them out. Meanwhile I know there are people who face the wrath of both black and white people that are able to come to this country and make something of themselves. If you put forth the effort, you can be as equal to - and sometimes greater than the average white person in this country. I'm not groveling at the feet of anyone here to "prove" I'm not a white racist. My point here is to show that IM2 is the racist and that he holds no special ability to be able to judge others.

If God thinks I'm a white racist, he will get to judge me. I don't care what everybody else thinks about it. God will judge me. And when I die, if God asks me if I treated others as I wanted to be treated, I will say yes sir. If he asks for an accounting of my life, I'm hoping that what I did will please Him (though I am a sinner.) If he asks if I loved my neighbor, I'm hoping I'll be past this thread by then. I'll have to work really hard to forgive you IM2. But, if others see the venomous hatred you've spewed, the divisiveness you create, the code of intolerance you live by, and the lies you hide behind AND if they rebuke you and force you to reevaluate your message, I might be able to forgive you and answer God another way. And maybe tomorrow this post won't bother me as much as it does today. Hate, revenge, malice, dishonesty - these are not a way of life that will bring you peace or contentment.

 

[Humorme]

I'm laughing at these racists in here (Pssst! That'd be you, IM2) lying about how everyone ELSE is racist. You and Essien and other race-obsessed ass munches spew your shit all over society, drag it into literally EVERYTHING in the public arena, and then when we're forced to respond to it, you start crowing about how we're "thinking about race". Newsflash, Punkin: it's not race we're actually thinking about. we're thinking about loudmouthed assholes, who happen to screech endlessly about their race.

Stop yammering constantly about "I'm so downtrodden because RACE!" I can promise you we wouldn't give it another thought.

**** you. OK. It's just that simple. You are a racist. So are many of the others here and none of you miserable bastards represents all the white people in America. So shut the hell up. You are in the race and racism section *****. You don't want to talk about race, go elsewhere. There are plenty of sections here not about race you can enter. You don't get to make this the exclusive white racists get to talk bullshit section. We will not shut up.

Punkin.

Thank you for proving my point. You know why most Americans think blacks are more racist than whites? Because you and Essien and others like you have proven that, in your case, it's the truth.

The more you talk, the more obvious it is to everyone that you've lost this argument.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: people don't think you're ignorant trash because you're black. They think it because you're ignorant trash . . . and you would be if you were any other race.

If IM2 were my blood brother, he would still be a ......

A what? I see six dots, what are you trying to say?

The 6 dots are symbolic of a word that begins with "n" and ends with "r".

Ray Charles could see that.

That was a reach. Liar. Everybody else that knows what IM2 is has stated it. That is why I said read the thread. You can only repeat something so many times.

 

[Humorme]

If you cannot respond intelligently, this discussion between you and I is over.

What's intelligent to the wolf is not gonna be intelligent to the sheep.

It don't make a flying **** what color an employer is; it don't matter what religion they are... you know the standard line... If an employer don't want to hire you, they should not feel compelled to.

So are you saying that employers should discriminate based on race and be pro white ?

My last employer, familiar with my work was black and his wife Mexican. His perception of me is that I must be a Mexican. He hired me based upon a stereotype. Of the 52 employees in that company, I counted seven whites (including me.) This is in a town with over 80 percent of the residents being white. The company has been there for years and the whites don't give a rat's ass about the racial makeup of that company.Okay, you want to call me a liar again. WTF?

If white people don't give a rats ass about racial make up company then why is racial discrimination so strong in companies ?

Okay, you want to deny that the early Egyptians were not black? I'll give you that one

The early Egyptians were black

but you'll regret it if you conjure up enough common sense to stay in this discussion. Now for the second part of what you quoted... and the answer is:

"A foreigner cannot own agricultural lands or, similarly, lands that can be reclaimed for agricultural purposes all over Egypt."

Buying Property in Egypt


"Law 230/1996 further states that a foreigner may not own more than two real estate units in Egypt for residency purposes (for himself and his immediate family), each of which may not exceed 4,000 square meters. However, the Prime Minister may at his own discretion exempt non-Egyptians from the above two requirement."

https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/in...lications/2016/03/bk_egypt_dbi_2016.pdf?la=en

So, prior to 1996 foreigners could not buy any kind of land in Egypt, and even today they are very limited. I think an I'm sorry is order, but do you have it in you?

Can you point to where I said "A foreigner cannot own agricultural lands or, similarly, lands that can be reclaimed for agricultural purposes all over Egypt." ?

Finally, you try to make the same point a lot of people do when they screw someone over and then become recipients of their own medicine. In any event, it was the whites that put an end to slavery as you know it.

Slavery has never ended. Slavery was just the first stage of white supremacy. Racism is slavery.

The central impact of the African Transatlantic Slave trade you brush aside is the legacy. And it’s that legacy that connects us and everyone else posting in this forum today and will continue until the day it’s resolved or addressed.

You cannot (and here is the challenge if you are up for it) point to any other form of slavery (present, past or pre-historic) that has had such an immense and global impact on this planet than the African Holocaust

The outcome of that operation is the crucial factor which in terms of scale and magnitude has gone unsurpassed and has had a profound effect on millions worldwide. Not just because of slavery, that was just the starting point. But because white supremacy would not allow themselves to see blacks as humans and it carried on long after the slave trade was abolished.

It still exists; you support it every day and if you claim you don't then you are a liar. All of us buy goods made in foreign countries that use slave labor. Sometimes we buy stuff from the good old USA, knowing (or having reason to believe) it was produced by slave labor. Where is your outrage then? Oh Hell no. You aren't boycotting Walmart. If the price is right, you're all about it.

And who are the companies who exploit the slave labour ? White people. Your people.

Take for example the computer or I-phone your on now. How do you think that works ? All I-Phones or Laptop need a mineral called conglese coltan other wise it won't work

Now who do you think own's coltan deposits in the Congo ? Who is forcing kids as young as seven to work in back breaking and dangerous condition ? The white supremacist like you. The likes Vodaphone, Apple and Microsoft

That's how white supremacy runs. You create a dependency on the people you are shitting on. You name the problem, the disease, the human suffering, or the abject misery visited upon millions, and I'll bet any money I can put a white face on it.

You just keep coming here and doing the pity me line.

You seem to think I am in the business of telling sob stories to appeal to the pity of whites. That assumes a favourable view of whites and a paternalistic view of blacks that you seem to share but I do not. As I have made plain elsewhere whites have hearts of stone when it comes to blacks and history shows that.

Second this USMB. Let's be clear. I have been on here a year and in that time. It's only me and IM2 and MarcATL JQPublic1 and katsteve2012 that have opinions that go against the grain. They are the only ones that I've have seen post stuff that challenges racism-white supremacy. Meanwhile USMB has 43 thousand members who all go a long with the dominant narrative

As I said - That my posts are such an affront to you speaks VOLUMES about the privilege you posses, where even a single small instance of contrary opinions are a threat to you. And causes you to erupt like a hilarious volcano.

Not to mention that white supremacists claim to be victims of all kinds of things: taxes, big government, immigrants, reverse discrimination, secular humanism, “radical Islam,” you name it.

White supremacists love victimhood

So long as they’re the ones who get to choose which victims count.

If you cannot respond intelligently, this discussion between you and I is over.

What's intelligent to the wolf is not gonna be intelligent to the sheep.

It don't make a flying **** what color an employer is; it don't matter what religion they are... you know the standard line... If an employer don't want to hire you, they should not feel compelled to.

So are you saying that employers should discriminate based on race and be pro white ?

My last employer, familiar with my work was black and his wife Mexican. His perception of me is that I must be a Mexican. He hired me based upon a stereotype. Of the 52 employees in that company, I counted seven whites (including me.) This is in a town with over 80 percent of the residents being white. The company has been there for years and the whites don't give a rat's ass about the racial makeup of that company.Okay, you want to call me a liar again. WTF?

If white people don't give a rats ass about racial make up company then why is racial discrimination so strong in companies ?

Okay, you want to deny that the early Egyptians were not black? I'll give you that one

The early Egyptians were black

but you'll regret it if you conjure up enough common sense to stay in this discussion. Now for the second part of what you quoted... and the answer is:

"A foreigner cannot own agricultural lands or, similarly, lands that can be reclaimed for agricultural purposes all over Egypt."

Buying Property in Egypt


"Law 230/1996 further states that a foreigner may not own more than two real estate units in Egypt for residency purposes (for himself and his immediate family), each of which may not exceed 4,000 square meters. However, the Prime Minister may at his own discretion exempt non-Egyptians from the above two requirement."

https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/in...lications/2016/03/bk_egypt_dbi_2016.pdf?la=en

So, prior to 1996 foreigners could not buy any kind of land in Egypt, and even today they are very limited. I think an I'm sorry is order, but do you have it in you?

Can you point to where I said "A foreigner cannot own agricultural lands or, similarly, lands that can be reclaimed for agricultural purposes all over Egypt." ?

Finally, you try to make the same point a lot of people do when they screw someone over and then become recipients of their own medicine. In any event, it was the whites that put an end to slavery as you know it.

Slavery has never ended. Slavery was just the first stage of white supremacy. Racism is slavery.

The central impact of the African Transatlantic Slave trade you brush aside is the legacy. And it’s that legacy that connects us and everyone else posting in this forum today and will continue until the day it’s resolved or addressed.

You cannot (and here is the challenge if you are up for it) point to any other form of slavery (present, past or pre-historic) that has had such an immense and global impact on this planet than the African Holocaust

The outcome of that operation is the crucial factor which in terms of scale and magnitude has gone unsurpassed and has had a profound effect on millions worldwide. Not just because of slavery, that was just the starting point. But because white supremacy would not allow themselves to see blacks as humans and it carried on long after the slave trade was abolished.

It still exists; you support it every day and if you claim you don't then you are a liar. All of us buy goods made in foreign countries that use slave labor. Sometimes we buy stuff from the good old USA, knowing (or having reason to believe) it was produced by slave labor. Where is your outrage then? Oh Hell no. You aren't boycotting Walmart. If the price is right, you're all about it.

And who are the companies who exploit the slave labour ? White people. Your people.

Take for example the computer or I-phone your on now. How do you think that works ? All I-Phones or Laptop need a mineral called conglese coltan other wise it won't work

Now who do you think own's coltan deposits in the Congo ? Who is forcing kids as young as seven to work in back breaking and dangerous condition ? The white supremacist like you. The likes Vodaphone, Apple and Microsoft

That's how white supremacy runs. You create a dependency on the people you are shitting on. You name the problem, the disease, the human suffering, or the abject misery visited upon millions, and I'll bet any money I can put a white face on it.

You just keep coming here and doing the pity me line.

You seem to think I am in the business of telling sob stories to appeal to the pity of whites. That assumes a favourable view of whites and a paternalistic view of blacks that you seem to share but I do not. As I have made plain elsewhere whites have hearts of stone when it comes to blacks and history shows that.

Second this USMB. Let's be clear. I have been on here a year and in that time. It's only me and IM2 and MarcATL JQPublic1 and katsteve2012 that have opinions that go against the grain. They are the only ones that I've have seen post stuff that challenges racism-white supremacy. Meanwhile USMB has 43 thousand members who all go a long with the dominant narrative

As I said - That my posts are such an affront to you speaks VOLUMES about the privilege you posses, where even a single small instance of contrary opinions are a threat to you. And causes you to erupt like a hilarious volcano.

Not to mention that white supremacists claim to be victims of all kinds of things: taxes, big government, immigrants, reverse discrimination, secular humanism, “radical Islam,” you name it.

White supremacists love victimhood

So long as they’re the ones who get to choose which victims count.

If you cannot respond intelligently, this discussion between you and I is over.

What's intelligent to the wolf is not gonna be intelligent to the sheep.

It don't make a flying **** what color an employer is; it don't matter what religion they are... you know the standard line... If an employer don't want to hire you, they should not feel compelled to.

So are you saying that employers should discriminate based on race and be pro white ?

My last employer, familiar with my work was black and his wife Mexican. His perception of me is that I must be a Mexican. He hired me based upon a stereotype. Of the 52 employees in that company, I counted seven whites (including me.) This is in a town with over 80 percent of the residents being white. The company has been there for years and the whites don't give a rat's ass about the racial makeup of that company.Okay, you want to call me a liar again. WTF?

If white people don't give a rats ass about racial make up company then why is racial discrimination so strong in companies ?

Okay, you want to deny that the early Egyptians were not black? I'll give you that one

The early Egyptians were black

but you'll regret it if you conjure up enough common sense to stay in this discussion. Now for the second part of what you quoted... and the answer is:

"A foreigner cannot own agricultural lands or, similarly, lands that can be reclaimed for agricultural purposes all over Egypt."

Buying Property in Egypt


"Law 230/1996 further states that a foreigner may not own more than two real estate units in Egypt for residency purposes (for himself and his immediate family), each of which may not exceed 4,000 square meters. However, the Prime Minister may at his own discretion exempt non-Egyptians from the above two requirement."

https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/in...lications/2016/03/bk_egypt_dbi_2016.pdf?la=en

So, prior to 1996 foreigners could not buy any kind of land in Egypt, and even today they are very limited. I think an I'm sorry is order, but do you have it in you?

Can you point to where I said "A foreigner cannot own agricultural lands or, similarly, lands that can be reclaimed for agricultural purposes all over Egypt." ?

Finally, you try to make the same point a lot of people do when they screw someone over and then become recipients of their own medicine. In any event, it was the whites that put an end to slavery as you know it.

Slavery has never ended. Slavery was just the first stage of white supremacy. Racism is slavery.

The central impact of the African Transatlantic Slave trade you brush aside is the legacy. And it’s that legacy that connects us and everyone else posting in this forum today and will continue until the day it’s resolved or addressed.

You cannot (and here is the challenge if you are up for it) point to any other form of slavery (present, past or pre-historic) that has had such an immense and global impact on this planet than the African Holocaust

The outcome of that operation is the crucial factor which in terms of scale and magnitude has gone unsurpassed and has had a profound effect on millions worldwide. Not just because of slavery, that was just the starting point. But because white supremacy would not allow themselves to see blacks as humans and it carried on long after the slave trade was abolished.

It still exists; you support it every day and if you claim you don't then you are a liar. All of us buy goods made in foreign countries that use slave labor. Sometimes we buy stuff from the good old USA, knowing (or having reason to believe) it was produced by slave labor. Where is your outrage then? Oh Hell no. You aren't boycotting Walmart. If the price is right, you're all about it.

And who are the companies who exploit the slave labour ? White people. Your people.

Take for example the computer or I-phone your on now. How do you think that works ? All I-Phones or Laptop need a mineral called conglese coltan other wise it won't work

Now who do you think own's coltan deposits in the Congo ? Who is forcing kids as young as seven to work in back breaking and dangerous condition ? The white supremacist like you. The likes Vodaphone, Apple and Microsoft

That's how white supremacy runs. You create a dependency on the people you are shitting on. You name the problem, the disease, the human suffering, or the abject misery visited upon millions, and I'll bet any money I can put a white face on it.

You just keep coming here and doing the pity me line.

You seem to think I am in the business of telling sob stories to appeal to the pity of whites. That assumes a favourable view of whites and a paternalistic view of blacks that you seem to share but I do not. As I have made plain elsewhere whites have hearts of stone when it comes to blacks and history shows that.

Second this USMB. Let's be clear. I have been on here a year and in that time. It's only me and IM2 and MarcATL JQPublic1 and katsteve2012 that have opinions that go against the grain. They are the only ones that I've have seen post stuff that challenges racism-white supremacy. Meanwhile USMB has 43 thousand members who all go a long with the dominant narrative

As I said - That my posts are such an affront to you speaks VOLUMES about the privilege you posses, where even a single small instance of contrary opinions are a threat to you. And causes you to erupt like a hilarious volcano.

Not to mention that white supremacists claim to be victims of all kinds of things: taxes, big government, immigrants, reverse discrimination, secular humanism, “radical Islam,” you name it.

White supremacists love victimhood

So long as they’re the ones who get to choose which victims count.

You have a smart ass answer for everything a white person says. Having been around racists, you are one. You wrote:

"So are you saying that employers should discriminate based on race and be pro white ?"

RESPONSE: Here is why you cannot have a civil conversation. If you can show anyone where I said employers should discriminate based upon race I will give you $500 in cash.

I said no such ******* thing.

You wrote:

"If white people don't give a rats ass about racial make up company then why is racial discrimination so strong in companies ?"

RESPONSE: My guess is, it is a combination of things. Blacks are less qualified - such as yourself, wasting time pissing people off instead of taking courses that would help you learn something useful.

Sometimes it is because Blacks, like yourself, walk into the company with the attitude that you are due a job based upon your race.

Many times it is because Blacks, like yourself, don't apply for the jobs. You have more worldly things to do.

If you quit with the woe is me B.S. and applied yourself, you could get a job. There are jobs in this area where black managers will hire you. But you have to be able to put something on your resume besides community activist specializing in pissing white people off.

You wrote:

"You cannot (and here is the challenge if you are up for it) point to any other form of slavery (present, past or pre-historic) that has had such an immense and global impact on this planet than the African Holocaust..."

RESPONSE: Challenge accepted - You have stipulated that the Egyptian people were black.

Think of the Bible as secular history. There is an Israelite, NOT a black guy, and he is taken as a slave to Egypt. This guy is so amazing the Pharaoh promotes him to his second in command at some time in history.

At some point, Joseph's father goes to see his son in Egypt (mostly because there is a famine in the land.) And then, for 430 years the Israelites are held as slaves, building wonders that are attributed to the Egyptians... and so, the Israelites built cities, roads and many marvelous things. But, we attribute that to the Egyptians because it was on Egyptian soil, the materials paid for by Egyptians, the Egyptians rand the government.

See how I'm consistent with language there, Easy E? Whites built America and the Egyptians built Egypt. In both cases, slaves provided the labor. The Israelites only wanted to leave Egypt and create their own homeland. Blacks in America want to seek out revenge and take control of the country.

If my recollection of history is correct, the first slaves in America came here in 1619 in Jamestown and slavery ended here in 1865. If my math is correct, that is 246 years of slavery versus the blacks holding the Israelites in slavery for 430 years. Your story is NOWHERE close to what the Israelites went through.

You wrote:

"And who are the companies who exploit the slave labour ? White people. Your people."

RESPONSE: My people? LMFAO. "My" people don't own or control squat. Even Faux News, the main source for people who think anywhere close to where I think is owned by an Australian (who was a chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations and a Saudi Prince.)

Our food supply, most of it controlled by Monsanto, is owned by people like Goldman Sachs - a corporate member of the Council on Foreign Relations (another political nemesis of mine.)

You got the wrong guy once again.

You presume too much about what I think. I don't agree with corporate America. Unlike you, I don't tolerate what other whites do and try to make excuses for their wrongdoing. My basic fight is against the corporate control of America. I own what my race does and what you don't realize is that if there were not so many dumb asses trying to war against our culture and the foundational principles, more time could be spent fighting against those who play both sides and keep America in chaos while they make out like bandits.

How many more times are you going to try and lie about what I've said? How many spankings can you endure?

 

[katsteve2012]

**** you. OK. It's just that simple. You are a racist. So are many of the others here and none of you miserable bastards represents all the white people in America. So shut the hell up. You are in the race and racism section *****. You don't want to talk about race, go elsewhere. There are plenty of sections here not about race you can enter. You don't get to make this the exclusive white racists get to talk bullshit section. We will not shut up.

Punkin.

Thank you for proving my point. You know why most Americans think blacks are more racist than whites? Because you and Essien and others like you have proven that, in your case, it's the truth.

The more you talk, the more obvious it is to everyone that you've lost this argument.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: people don't think you're ignorant trash because you're black. They think it because you're ignorant trash . . . and you would be if you were any other race.

If IM2 were my blood brother, he would still be a ......

A what? I see six dots, what are you trying to say?

The 6 dots are symbolic of a word that begins with "n" and ends with "r".

Ray Charles could see that.

That was a reach. Liar. Everybody else that knows what IM2 is has stated it. That is why I said read the thread. You can only repeat something so many times.

Well prove me to be a liar.

As opposed to playing "64 questions", and "name that tune", say what you meant by:


"If IM2 was my blood brother, he would still be a: ......"

 

[Humorme]

Thank you for proving my point. You know why most Americans think blacks are more racist than whites? Because you and Essien and others like you have proven that, in your case, it's the truth.

The more you talk, the more obvious it is to everyone that you've lost this argument.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: people don't think you're ignorant trash because you're black. They think it because you're ignorant trash . . . and you would be if you were any other race.

If IM2 were my blood brother, he would still be a ......

A what? I see six dots, what are you trying to say?

The 6 dots are symbolic of a word that begins with "n" and ends with "r".

Ray Charles could see that.

That was a reach. Liar. Everybody else that knows what IM2 is has stated it. That is why I said read the thread. You can only repeat something so many times.

Well prove me to be a liar.

As opposed to playing "64 questions", snd "name that tune", say what you meant by:


"If IM2 wss my blood brother, he would still be a ......"

I believe that the words posters here use for IM2 are liar, racist, asshole, moron - and several more have been uttered many times in describing IM2.

And, if the same shit came out of my own brother's mouth, I would tell him he was all of the above.

 

[IM2]

I'm laughing at these racists in here lying about how much they don't think about race. There are over 4,000 threads in this section primarily by whits about race where they think about bring white.

And you participate on most of those threads because you are... I don't even have to say anything.

I've not participated in most of the threads. Again arguing against the racism of whites is not racism. Saying there are whites who are racists is not saying all whites are racist so that's not racism. Debunking/strongly rebuking what racists such as you and others in here say is not racism. Saying whites do not experience racism is not racism. Calling you out on your racism is not calling all whites racist.. You are a racist. We all know it.

Unless the white person agrees with you on every aspect of race, they are a racist. You are delusional and everybody knows that. Making false claims makes you a pathological liar and most of us know that.

Saying whites do not experience racism is pure idiocy. Therefore, you piss a lot of people off and keep them on these threads. You are my poster boy when people ask me why I don't think blacks should become citizens. If they all think like you, then it would be a colossal mistake. And what bothers me most about the situation is that there are people like you, spewing venomous hatred that a lot of blacks refuse to condemn. For that reason, I don't condemn the real white racists. And they don't like me!

I'm going to say something to you because I'm fed up with your racism. It is something I am not ashamed to say will make me hate you as an individual and pray that God will help me to forgive you after today, but I guess we cannot avoid this because I've always felt if I had to make this point, it would amount to groveling at the feet of black supremacists. But, before I write this next paragraph, know this: I don't need your validation or anyone elses. What I'm about to say is just to prove that you are a liar, racist and in this discussion only to demean people while talking out your ass.

You said about me, "You are a racist. We all know it." Do "we"? Again, my response is not intended to grovel at your feet like the person who says, I'm not a racist. My best friend, relative, etc. is black. This is being done to prove to every person here that you don't know what the Hell you're talking about; that you are wrong; and that if you don't issue an apology, it will be obvious who the real racist is.

My sister married a Lebanese and my uncle married a very dark Mexican lady. My sister and aunt have since passed, but my uncle will tell you that all of my family members felt more comfortable in my house than any of our other relatives. And one of my aunts is a Democrat!

When I first got into being a foster parent, it came about when an old lady came to me with a small boy whose mother was Honduran and his father Mexican. The parents, here without papers, left and abandoned their baby. He was with me through the most important years of his life. I tried to adopt him, but the mother finally got her excrement together and got custody of him back. His pictures are still all over my house.

As a foster parent, I've had to care for children of every race imaginable. Many times children need / want things above and beyond what .DFACS was willing to cover. I have no problem going into my own pocket and buying things just for a smile - just to see their eyes light up. Years ago a very young teen was here without papers, working a job and trying to eke out a living. When an amnesty period came around, I did the paperwork and helped him get his papers. My charge was merely telling him I expected him to become a good citizen. Today, he tells people I am his father. And, when I need things like my car fixed or something done around the house, he shows up without any hesitation.

Here was a guy that at 14, leaves his country. His father was killed when this boy was an infant. He had no education, didn't speak English, had no family support system, no papers, nothing. Yet he starts out in construction, working double shifts and ultimately going back to school. I went to his graduation, not realizing what he thought about me. He was telling people I was his dad. Today he owns his own garage. He thinks my small gestures put him where he is - and while I am grateful for that, he did it on his own.

On and on I could go with stories like this - or you can read about my many run ins with neo-Nazis on this board. But, IM2, you come here bitching every day about white racists. You pretend you can sniff them out. Meanwhile I know there are people who face the wrath of both black and white people that are able to come to this country and make something of themselves. If you put forth the effort, you can be as equal to - and sometimes greater than the average white person in this country. I'm not groveling at the feet of anyone here to "prove" I'm not a white racist. My point here is to show that IM2 is the racist and that he holds no special ability to be able to judge others.

If God thinks I'm a white racist, he will get to judge me. I don't care what everybody else thinks about it. God will judge me. And when I die, if God asks me if I treated others as I wanted to be treated, I will say yes sir. If he asks for an accounting of my life, I'm hoping that what I did will please Him (though I am a sinner.) If he asks if I loved my neighbor, I'm hoping I'll be past this thread by then. I'll have to work really hard to forgive you IM2. But, if others see the venomous hatred you've spewed, the divisiveness you create, the code of intolerance you live by, and the lies you hide behind AND if they rebuke you and force you to reevaluate your message, I might be able to forgive you and answer God another way. And maybe tomorrow this post won't bother me as much as it does today. Hate, revenge, malice, dishonesty - these are not a way of life that will bring you peace or contentment.

No, you are a racist for what you have posted. You see humone I know I'm on the right side. I know you are not. You see, God isn't going to be asking you for yes or no answers. God is going to ask you why you believed that other human beings did not have the right be citizens in a nation you lived in. You will then understand as God explains to you how that is not loving your neighbors as you would yourself. What you will work hard to do is of no consequence to me, because I don't need your forgiveness for things I did not do.

You are a racist, and now you want to lie about me because I stand up to your evil. I'm not re evaluating my message because you have decided to make assumptions. Not all whites are racists, I've said that, but I do not have to continue making disclaimers because a punk ass ***** like you got his feelings hurt.

Blacks are not more racist than whites. You can't name one law or policy made by blacks that has ever denied a white person anything in this country. You cannot describe any system by blacks that allowed for the things Essen mentioned to be done to whites by blacks BY LAW. All you can do is whine like the ***** made ***** you are and call us racists because we don't believe whites face the same, or worse racism from backs as we have had to endure from whites. American History shows we are right. American history shows you are not. And certainly a poll of 1500 people out of 300 million or more doesn't support that claim either.

I'm at peace and very content. You are the one with problems.

 

[IM2]

If IM2 were my blood brother, he would still be a ......

A what? I see six dots, what are you trying to say?

The 6 dots are symbolic of a word that begins with "n" and ends with "r".

Ray Charles could see that.

That was a reach. Liar. Everybody else that knows what IM2 is has stated it. That is why I said read the thread. You can only repeat something so many times.

Well prove me to be a liar.

As opposed to playing "64 questions", snd "name that tune", say what you meant by:


"If IM2 wss my blood brother, he would still be a ......"

I believe that the words posters here use for IM2 are liar, racist, asshole, moron - and several more have been uttered many times in describing IM2.

And, if the same shit came out of my own brother's mouth, I would tell him he was all of the above.

You seem to have problems posting quotes made by me that prove your accusations. Every else one here doesn't see shit. The majority posting here are white racists like you. Those who are not see things the way I do.