AP News tries to connect Pelosi attacker to Jan 6

"This is probably true but it will be covered up by the MSM for a different narrative accusing MAGA Republicans."
"This was not the first time "faux husband" Paul had gay coke whore in the residence. Dykey Nancy had the SFPD cover for that. The SFPD was there the whole time. The SFPD opens the door, searches the gay coke whore, escorts him way upstairs to a bedroom with Paul......"
----------------------------------------

I love this bar.
It's a trip to the city zoo.
Or 'the Ward' of Cuckoo's Nest.
Sort of.

And the QMAGA's come on social media sites and openly wonder why people think they are nutsocrazo?
 
See?
This is why I missed EMH when his avatar went off to a monastery, or a retreat, or rehab, or a safe space, or got banned. I missed his avatar. My avatar missed his avatar.
He offers such a perceptive and transparent view into the world of the QMAGA's.
A glimpse into the vortex of corrosive fringie conspiracies, and grievance burdened fantasies.
And for that we all must be thankful.
It gives us a chance to pat ourselves on the back and exclaim --"Man, I couldn't live like that. Glad I ain't one of them. I ain't so bad, after all."
No?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prove what to be "bullshit"? That the guy stated "Where's Nancy"? That the guy was reported to have zip-ties? Neither one seems too outlandish to me.
Were both similar to incidents on January 6th? Seems so.
And if the reportage continues and it develops that the perp did not ask about Nancy's whereabouts, nor possessed zip-ties....no retraction is needed. Simply an expansion of the reportage as new information comes in. That's the nature of news reporting. Stories 'emerge'....are 'fast developing'.....'new information comes in', yadda, yadda, yadda.


Reporters report stuff that they are told or they observe. If they are told the guy asked about Nancy and had ties.....well, if they think the source has credibility...they report it. Duh!
There's no need here for poster Angus to be so defensive over January 6th. IMHO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Didja see the comments about poster EMH just above?
Well, jus wash, rinse and repeat......they seemingly can apply to poster 22lcidw also.
Except, he never went on a sabbatical where we would have found out if we would miss him.

Who claimed DePape said, “Where’s Nancy?”
 
See?
This is why I missed EMH when his avatar went off to a monastery, or a retreat, or rehab, or a safe space, or got banned. I missed his avatar. My avatar missed his avatar.
He offers such a perceptive and transparent view into the world of the QMAGA's.
A glimpse into the vortex of corrosive fringie conspiracies, and grievance burdened fantasies.
And for that we all must be thankful.
It gives us a chance to pat ourselves on the back and exclaim --"Man, I couldn't live like that. Glad I ain't one of them. I ain't so bad, after all."
No?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prove what to be "bullshit"? That the guy stated "Where's Nancy"? That the guy was reported to have zip-ties? Neither one seems too outlandish to me.
Were both similar to incidents on January 6th? Seems so.
And if the reportage continues and it develops that the perp did not ask about Nancy's whereabouts, nor possessed zip-ties....no retraction is needed. Simply an expansion of the reportage as new information comes in. That's the nature of news reporting. Stories 'emerge'....are 'fast developing'.....'new information comes in', yadda, yadda, yadda.

Reporters report stuff that they are told or they observe. If they are told the guy asked about Nancy and had ties.....well, if they think the source has credibility...they report it. Duh!
There's no need here for poster Angus to be so defensive over January 6th. IMHO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Didja see the comments about poster EMH just above?
Well, jus wash, rinse and repeat......they seemingly can apply to poster 22lcidw also.
Except, he never went on a sabbatical where we would have found out if we would miss him.



You are claiming the gay coke whore shouted "where is Nancy"


Document that claim

What is the evidence behind that claim?
 
See?
This is why I missed EMH when his avatar went off to a monastery, or a retreat, or rehab, or a safe space, or got banned. I missed his avatar. My avatar missed his avatar.
He offers such a perceptive and transparent view into the world of the QMAGA's.
A glimpse into the vortex of corrosive fringie conspiracies, and grievance burdened fantasies.
And for that we all must be thankful.
It gives us a chance to pat ourselves on the back and exclaim --"Man, I couldn't live like that. Glad I ain't one of them. I ain't so bad, after all."
No?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prove what to be "bullshit"? That the guy stated "Where's Nancy"? That the guy was reported to have zip-ties? Neither one seems too outlandish to me.
Were both similar to incidents on January 6th? Seems so.
And if the reportage continues and it develops that the perp did not ask about Nancy's whereabouts, nor possessed zip-ties....no retraction is needed. Simply an expansion of the reportage as new information comes in. That's the nature of news reporting. Stories 'emerge'....are 'fast developing'.....'new information comes in', yadda, yadda, yadda.


Reporters report stuff that they are told or they observe. If they are told the guy asked about Nancy and had ties.....well, if they think the source has credibility...they report it. Duh!
There's no need here for poster Angus to be so defensive over January 6th. IMHO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Didja see the comments about poster EMH just above?
Well, jus wash, rinse and repeat......they seemingly can apply to poster 22lcidw also.
Except, he never went on a sabbatical where we would have found out if we would miss him.

He kept the zipties in his whitey tighties? So Paul Pelosi subdues the attacker - then made him strip down to his undies? This makes sense to you? 81,LOL,LOL you believe ANYTHING
 
You are claiming the gay coke whore shouted "where is Nancy"


Document that claim

What is the evidence behind that claim?

They are so busted….with just one question.

CULT FUCKS ARE SO PATHETIC.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
Did the Police confirm DePape said, “Where’s Nancy”?

Link?

WHO TOLD POLICE?

Come on, cult….this should be easy.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
That's what you got out of that?

The sick bastards are the wing nuts

Don't try to project your sickness on me, you perv. It wasn't me who was caught in his underwear with a gay prostitute. You're the ones who support homosexuality, transsexuals, furries, and other pervoids. That's your party's platform, not mine.

:laughing0301:
 
Maybe because they were but saying the same thing:

"Where's Nancy?"

They both have committed violent acts to get to that stage and they both seemed to want to hurt Nancy...

So yes there is a fucking connection... They were both listening to the same guy put the same bullshit into their heads....

Who claimed that is what DePape said? Did the police confirm? Who told police?
 
FgYBzZEXEAIpWRi
THIS SUMS UP EVERTYTHING PERFECTLY!

Nancy must be really desperate to hire a gay prostitute to hit Paul in the head with a hammer.
 
----------------------------------------

I love this bar.
It's a trip to the city zoo.
Or 'the Ward' of Cuckoo's Nest.
Sort of.

And the QMAGA's come on social media sites and openly wonder why people think they are nutsocrazo?

Life Advice for Morons:

Don't "STIFF" a rainbow warrior Alphabet Pedo Grooming Lobby flag waving drug addicted gay prostitute and you won't get hit in the head with a hammer.
 
"This makes sense to you? 81,LOL,LOL you believe ANYTHING"

Umm, damn!!
I gotta start typing in bigger fonts......in order to be clearer.
I had hoped to be clear to other posters, for example CrusaderFrank, that my comments were on comments by some of the QMAGA's who grace this social media site.
And truthfully, that is enough for me.
I don't hafta believe in news stories.
I just make observations....and sometimes, suggestions.....on the world of QANON and it's true-believers on this site.
Are you a Q, Frank?
 
The Pelosis MUST have given their home security to the police, right? It will show Depape breaking into the house….RIGHT?
 
Umm, damn!!
I gotta start typing in bigger fonts......in order to be clearer.
I had hoped to be clear to other posters, for example CrusaderFrank, that my comments were on comments by some of the QMAGA's who grace this social media site.
And truthfully, that is enough for me.
I don't hafta believe in news stories.
I just make observations....and sometimes, suggestions.....on the world of QANON and it's true-believers on this site.
Are you a Q, Frank?



EMH and others here have accused Q-anon of being a fraud "conservative" group run by left wing hate hoaxing homO
Loving HOMOS pretending to be trump supporters...

Thanks for validating us.
 

Forum List

Back
Top