- Nov 10, 2019
- 47,429
- 30,070
- 2,490
- Moderator
- #81
Covid Bill she co-wrote with another Squad.
That's not the real problem with the Bill.. Trump played into their hands on this.. ONLY PEOPLE who need "money for nothing" are the unemployed and folks behind on their bills.. Probably 50% of those direct payments go to folks that are either WORKING or retire on fixed income with no Covid issues.
UPPING those payments is as BIG a waste as the $50Million in the appropriations side of this clusterfuck porksicle for Cent. American NARCO DICTATORS to build BIGGER and more CORRUPT drug empires.. Get ready for MAJOR STREAMS of money flushed down the crapper by the Biden Admin trying to cure our "border problem" by making the Narco Dictators stronger and richer..
But it's politics in Washington.
Any politician that doesn't play the game is deemed unfit. By changing the sum for Americans (not even every American) to $2000 I think he's outplayed the Democrats.
If they disagree and don't do it he looks like the good guy.
If they do agree, then to still add all their porkulus the cost will be astronomical and they will look irresponsible.
I dunno. Could go either way.
Naw.. He misplayed that one.. Should have started out by nailing them for HIDING the Covid relief in the humongo Porkulus Omnibus.. Tell them about their tiny private parts for not being brave enough to pass it separately.. YOU KNOW there's no limit to the free stuff Dems are willing to bribe voters with.. It's like their favorite brain dead play..
Should have focused on the Swamp Buffet which was the BIGGER PART of that Bill.. As they say -- "THE OPTICS" stinks by combining the two...
What about Mitch and the thing republican bribe the voters with. I have put drinks on expense accounts but never take them off taxes, unless it was done by corporate at their level. Cheap point, but the Dems aren't the only ones in on this as it is mostly the result of a bipartisan recommendation. It takes two to tango with the money in our system.
Like I always say -- bipartisan agreement between these 2 inept, corrupt tribes means TWICE the money for HALF of the performance..
Agree. Also agree with your earlier post about the money give away. I did not ask for $600, being one of those retired with fixed (I prefer the word guaranteed) income streams as I set it up this way to make sure I would not be depending on SS government money in my old age. Your point was correct, though, didn't need it as haven't lost a penny and expenses lower as traveling less. So now they want to give us between $3,000 and $4,000 dollars? I am not in a position to see the nation. I see Jackson, and it appears humping and bumping, though the Covid number rise every day.
Do not understand trump on this one. Do not know what Mitch and the Senate will do with it, but I do not see much pork being pulled off the bone to cover it. Got a guess?
Best guess? It mirrors that craze on campus to have a "sugar daddy" and the BIDDING for some of the co-eds gets REALLY REALLY expensive.. Others -- are happy with a $100 gift card to Macy's..
These 20 Colleges Have The Most Students With Sugar Daddies And 3 Of The Top 5 Are In Florida (Shocker) – BroBible
Sugar Daddy, eh? OK, maybe from guy who pay $130,000 to $150,000 to get laid, it is a pittance that doesn't come out of his pocket? Still doesn't ring right, as I don't think he even likes most of the people in this country and especially right now. You got another?
We're getting wined and dine before the "romance" starts??? In the lingo of the left -- this level of spending is "NOT SUSTAINABLE"... It will eventually fix itself..
But all we HAVE is Sugar Daddies bidding for our affection right now.. And they're spending our money to woo us..
Hate your theory. Can't say it is wrong, but cannot deny the feasibility.