AOC Flunks Economics 101

[iceberg]

you should stop referencing sources the other side has never quoted cause you think they're "giggle" funny and instantly add credibility to your views.

you might learn something.

You're parroting their line verbatim, dope.

Then show me the exact quote I parroted **** stick.

Your entire narrative, dope.

So you can't back up what you say.

Again

fox and friends on aoc - Google Search

Take your pick......Loser

Didn't quote a one. I may as well show antifa getting their ass kicked and say "that's you".

 

[Hutch Starskey]

She chose to run for congress, dope.

And that means what? That she's an expert in BSing? It sure doesn't mean she knows squat about economics or anything else. ANYONE can run for Congress. Strippers have done it.

Yep, she's degreed in economics but "knows squat about economics". ^Another obtuse loser.

1968 - Upon graduation from Wharton, Trump receives a Bachelor of Science degree in economics and a specialization in finance. At that time his father's company was in the lead in real estate, and Donald Trump began working in the family business.

Using your logic, Trump is an economic genius.

My logic never attributed anyone as a "genius", dope.

But Trump has a degree in economics.

He must be right now. Your rules, not mine.

I never argued right or wrong, dope. I argued she was an economist.

 

[iceberg]

And that means what? That she's an expert in BSing? It sure doesn't mean she knows squat about economics or anything else. ANYONE can run for Congress. Strippers have done it.

Yep, she's degreed in economics but "knows squat about economics". ^Another obtuse loser.

1968 - Upon graduation from Wharton, Trump receives a Bachelor of Science degree in economics and a specialization in finance. At that time his father's company was in the lead in real estate, and Donald Trump began working in the family business.

Using your logic, Trump is an economic genius.

My logic never attributed anyone as a "genius", dope.

But Trump has a degree in economics.

He must be right now. Your rules, not mine.

I never argued right or wrong, dope. I argued she was an economist.

And implied what with that logic? Eat it, **** stick. I'm out.

 

[Flash]

AOC wants to do away with cows, cars, children and airplanes and the cost will only be $94 trillion!

Her Green New Deal will only cost each American $600,000 each.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Sure, dope.
Accusing someone better credentialed than yourself of being dumb is dumb as shit.

do you know oddballs credentials?

seems you did a paint yourself in a corner post. as usual.

do you know oddballs credentials?

seems you did a paint yourself in a corner post. as usual.

I know enough to know you both have no clue in this regard. Those who have the education and experience able to readily spot those who do not.

Brilliant economists often work as bartenders...…..

A trained economist nonetheless. You are not.

A trained economist nonetheless.

What did that training get her again?
Apparently zero work in her field by the age of 29...…..

The title of "economist". The title refers to training, not occupation.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yep, she's degreed in economics but "knows squat about economics". ^Another obtuse loser.

1968 - Upon graduation from Wharton, Trump receives a Bachelor of Science degree in economics and a specialization in finance. At that time his father's company was in the lead in real estate, and Donald Trump began working in the family business.

Using your logic, Trump is an economic genius.

My logic never attributed anyone as a "genius", dope.

But Trump has a degree in economics.

He must be right now. Your rules, not mine.

I never argued right or wrong, dope. I argued she was an economist.

And implied what with that logic? Eat it, **** stick. I'm out.

That she's eminently more well versed on the subject than you, of course.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

do you know oddballs credentials?

seems you did a paint yourself in a corner post. as usual.

do you know oddballs credentials?

seems you did a paint yourself in a corner post. as usual.

I know enough to know you both have no clue in this regard. Those who have the education and experience able to readily spot those who do not.

Brilliant economists often work as bartenders...…..

A trained economist nonetheless. You are not.

A trained economist nonetheless.

What did that training get her again?
Apparently zero work in her field by the age of 29...…..

The title of "economist". The title refers to training, not occupation.

training, not occupation.

Or knowledge, apparently.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You're parroting their line verbatim, dope.

Then show me the exact quote I parroted **** stick.

Your entire narrative, dope.

So you can't back up what you say.

Again

fox and friends on aoc - Google Search

Take your pick......Loser

Didn't quote a one. I may as well show antifa getting their ass kicked and say "that's you".

Why would you do that?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I know enough to know you both have no clue in this regard. Those who have the education and experience able to readily spot those who do not.

Brilliant economists often work as bartenders...…..

A trained economist nonetheless. You are not.

A trained economist nonetheless.

What did that training get her again?
Apparently zero work in her field by the age of 29...…..

The title of "economist". The title refers to training, not occupation.

training, not occupation.

Or knowledge, apparently.

The knowledge is apparent given the degree, dope.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Brilliant economists often work as bartenders...…..

A trained economist nonetheless. You are not.

A trained economist nonetheless.

What did that training get her again?
Apparently zero work in her field by the age of 29...…..

The title of "economist". The title refers to training, not occupation.

training, not occupation.

Or knowledge, apparently.

The knowledge is apparent given the degree, dope.

Her statement that now New York can invest the $3 billion in Amazon incentives instead "to hire more teachers, fix our subways" shows that the knowledge is not there, idiot.

 

[danielpalos]

A trained economist nonetheless. You are not.

A trained economist nonetheless.

What did that training get her again?
Apparently zero work in her field by the age of 29...…..

The title of "economist". The title refers to training, not occupation.

training, not occupation.

Or knowledge, apparently.

The knowledge is apparent given the degree, dope.

Her statement that now New York can invest the $3 billion in Amazon incentives instead "to hire more teachers, fix our subways" shows that the knowledge is not there, idiot.

Google is moving in.

 

[RealDave]

AOC wants to do away with cows, cars, children and airplanes and the cost will only be $94 trillion!

Her Green New Deal will only cost each American $600,000 each.

Oh My God. Yet another dumbass Trumpette who can't ******* tread.

You people are dumber than shit.

 

[RealDave]

I know enough to know you both have no clue in this regard. Those who have the education and experience able to readily spot those who do not.

She has "education" yet doesn't know diddly-shit...If she was so smart, how did her econ degree not land her a big time job, other than being an over-educated bartender?

She chose to run for congress, dope.

And that means what? That she's an expert in BSing? It sure doesn't mean she knows squat about economics or anything else. ANYONE can run for Congress. Strippers have done it.

Yep, she's degreed in economics but "knows squat about economics". ^Another obtuse loser.

1968 - Upon graduation from Wharton, Trump receives a Bachelor of Science degree in economics and a specialization in finance. At that time his father's company was in the lead in real estate, and Donald Trump began working in the family business.

Using your logic, Trump is an economic genius.

You seem to think he is.

So why not AOC?

 

[iceberg]

She has "education" yet doesn't know diddly-shit...If she was so smart, how did her econ degree not land her a big time job, other than being an over-educated bartender?

She chose to run for congress, dope.

And that means what? That she's an expert in BSing? It sure doesn't mean she knows squat about economics or anything else. ANYONE can run for Congress. Strippers have done it.

Yep, she's degreed in economics but "knows squat about economics". ^Another obtuse loser.

1968 - Upon graduation from Wharton, Trump receives a Bachelor of Science degree in economics and a specialization in finance. At that time his father's company was in the lead in real estate, and Donald Trump began working in the family business.

Using your logic, Trump is an economic genius.

You seem to think he is.

So why not AOC?

I swear stupid is contageous.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Marc Thiessen: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is an economic illiterate -- And that's bad news for America

"The left complains that conservatives are "obsessing" over Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Well, there is a reason for that: Ocasio-Cortez is driving the agenda of today's Democratic Party -- and her economic illiteracy is dangerous.

Case in point: Last week, Ocasio-Cortez celebrated the tanking of a deal negotiated by her fellow Democrats in which Amazonpromised to build a new headquarters in Long Island City, New York, right next to her congressional district. Amazon's departure cost the city between 25,000 and 40,000 new jobs. Forget the tech workers whom Amazon would have employed. Gone are all the unionized construction jobs to build the headquarters, as well as thousands of jobs created by all the small businesses -- restaurants, bodegas, dry cleaners and food carts -- that were preparing to open or expand to serve Amazon employees. They are devastated by Amazon's withdrawal.

Ocasio-Cortez was not disturbed at all. "We were subsidizing those jobs," she said. "Frankly, if we were willing to give away $3 billion for this deal, we could invest those $3 billion in our district, ourselves, if we wanted to. We could hire out more teachers. We can fix our subways. We can put a lot of people to work for that amount of money if we wanted to."

No, you can't. Ocasio-Cortez does not seem to realize that New York does not have $3 billion in cash sitting around waiting to be spent on her socialist dreams. The subsidies to Amazon were tax incentives, not cash payouts. It is Amazon's money, which New York agreed to make tax-exempt, so the company would invest it in building its new headquarters, hiring new workers and generating tens of billions in new tax revenue."

You can't fix her Socialist type of 'stupid'.

.

You're correct, you cannot be fixed.

Either you are stupid, or too biased to see a point made by her which wasn't even abstract. She simply made an observation that the priorities would create long term jobs and lift up the people in her district.

She's a genuine moron and economic illiterate.

Are you agreeing with her?

I understand what she meant. It's kinda sad that you fit the mold of Easy65 - unable too think outside the box, the tiny little box of ignorance.

Another illiterate, too got-damned stoopit to recognize that the $3 bil isn't cash-on-hand.

LOL, a classic STRAW MAN. You are the one who is stupid.

NOWHERE DID SHE OR I SAY THE $3 BILLION WAS CASH IN HAND. ONCE AGAIN YOU ARE DISHONEST AND TOO STUPID TO BELIEVE OTHERS DON'T SEE THOROUGH YOUR MENDACIOUS METHODS AND CLICHES.

"Frankly, if we were willing to give away $3 billion for this deal, we could invest those $3 billion in our district, ourselves, if we wanted to." - AOC

Here's an idea, go to any bank of your choice, and tell them you would like to invest $3 billion dollars in future tax savings. Let us know how that goes please.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I know enough to know you both have no clue in this regard. Those who have the education and experience able to readily spot those who do not.

She has "education" yet doesn't know diddly-shit...If she was so smart, how did her econ degree not land her a big time job, other than being an over-educated bartender?

She chose to run for congress, dope.

And that means what? That she's an expert in BSing? It sure doesn't mean she knows squat about economics or anything else. ANYONE can run for Congress. Strippers have done it.

Yep, she's degreed in economics but "knows squat about economics". ^Another obtuse loser.

Yep, she has an undergrad degree, which anyone who isn't an ignorant elite-worshipper knows is just about worth the paper it's printed on outside of the STEM subjects.

And don't even get me started on your hypocrisy in the area of "This person has a DEGREE. That makes them brilliant and knowledgeable and professional!" Would you like to talk about the MANY people with degrees that you routinely dismiss as idiots, just because they aren't saying what you want to hear?

Why don't you say what you REALLY mean, which is "I agree with her, so that means she HAS to be brilliant, and I will grasp any straw to believe that"?

 

[Oddball]

Yep, she has an undergrad degree, which anyone who isn't an ignorant elite-worshipper knows is just about worth the paper it's printed on outside of the STEM subjects.

And don't even get me started on your hypocrisy in the area of "This person has a DEGREE. That makes them brilliant and knowledgeable and professional!" Would you like to talk about the MANY people with degrees that you routinely dismiss as idiots, just because they aren't saying what you want to hear?

Why don't you say what you REALLY mean, which is "I agree with her, so that means she HAS to be brilliant, and I will grasp any straw to believe that"?

I already told him of the "licensed" contractors I know of, whom I wouldn't trust to build a dog house, to demonstrate what pieces of paper are worth, but he doesn't GAF....In his little world, pieces of paper make you a bloody oracle.

 

[Oddball]

The knowledge is apparent given the degree, dope.

The lack of knowledge is apparent given the sub-cretinous bran droppings, that flop out of her unprepossessing mouth with alarming regularity.

 

[iceberg]

Yep, she has an undergrad degree, which anyone who isn't an ignorant elite-worshipper knows is just about worth the paper it's printed on outside of the STEM subjects.

And don't even get me started on your hypocrisy in the area of "This person has a DEGREE. That makes them brilliant and knowledgeable and professional!" Would you like to talk about the MANY people with degrees that you routinely dismiss as idiots, just because they aren't saying what you want to hear?

Why don't you say what you REALLY mean, which is "I agree with her, so that means she HAS to be brilliant, and I will grasp any straw to believe that"?

I already told him of the "licensed" contractors I know of, whom I wouldn't trust to build a dog house, to demonstrate what pieces of paper are worth, but he doesn't GAF....In his little world, pieces of paper make you a bloody oracle.

except i showed him trump has the same pieces of paper and he bypassed that. in his world, he's right and you're wrong and there's simply no logical reason for it other than he refuses to agree with you on anything at all so he winds up disagreeing with himself all the time all the while calling you and others "dope".

 

[Cecilie1200]

And that means what? That she's an expert in BSing? It sure doesn't mean she knows squat about economics or anything else. ANYONE can run for Congress. Strippers have done it.

Yep, she's degreed in economics but "knows squat about economics". ^Another obtuse loser.

1968 - Upon graduation from Wharton, Trump receives a Bachelor of Science degree in economics and a specialization in finance. At that time his father's company was in the lead in real estate, and Donald Trump began working in the family business.

Using your logic, Trump is an economic genius.

My logic never attributed anyone as a "genius", dope.

But Trump has a degree in economics.

He must be right now. Your rules, not mine.

I never argued right or wrong, dope. I argued she was an economist.

Except she's not. That's like saying someone with a bachelor's degree in education is automatically a teacher. My husband has an undergrad degree in journalism, but I can assure you he's not a reporter. He also has one in creative writing, but I can equally assure you he's not a writer.