Anyone Who Uses The Government To Influence Elections Should Be Prevented From Running For Office Ever Again

Trump asked to find LEGAL votes. YOUR assholes broke election laws out the wazoo to steal the election.

They also engaged the services of a foreign spy to manufacture the dossier, that is a FELONY, you fucking boob.

Trump didn't say shit about 'legal' votes. What he said was:

Trump: "All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state."

And then started threatening the officials with a 'criminal offense' if they didn't.

Trump: "And you are going to find that they are — which is totally illegal, it is more illegal for you than it is for them because, you know what they did and you’re not reporting it. That’s a criminal, that’s a criminal offense.

Try again, tinfoil.
 

Anyone Who Uses The Government To Influence Elections Should Be Prevented From Running For Office Ever Again​


If Durham wanted to really impress me, he would have recommended of all the people on your list that:
  1. They be forever bared from office ever agin.
  2. If they are currently holding office, they be fired.
  3. They be forever barred from working for the government ever again.
  4. They be stripped of all security clearances.
  5. They be forever barred from ever VOTING again.
  6. They be stripped of all government benefits, pension and the like.
  7. Then they be prosecuted for treason against the USA.
When they start dealing with people like this, I'll have respect for the government again.

BTW, Marc Elias on your list was not only a key player in the Russian hoax, but he was principle to engineering the 2020 election steal.
 
Trump didn't say shit about 'legal' votes.

Right moron, Trump said he needed to find more votes. He didn't say we need to find illegal votes, he didn't say we need to create votes, all he said is we need to find more votes to win, which is hardly a crime because everyone says that during an election. Saying you are wanting to find more votes to win is only a crime in your warped, commie, fascist mind, jackass.

Like a good little fascist, after democrats saying we need to find or get X number more votes 10,000 times, now you want to prosecute Trump for election fraud because he said it once. Meantime, all democrats do anymore is just keep finding more votes box after box for weeks after every election now. Meanwhile apparently after saying that, Trump's people didn't even find ten more votes.
 
The Duram investigation says that the Obama Administration and our current POTUS were involved in a conspiracy to create a false impression that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election.

The House should pass a law that prevents anyone who has been caught committing espionage against political opponents, while using any department of the federal government, should be disqualified from ever running for political office in the federal government.

Also, the guilty parties should be held civilly liable for any court costs, legal fees, as well as pain & suffering to the person that they directed this hoax against.

We don't have to rely on the DOJ to do their jobs and prosecute the guilty parties. We just have to pass legislation to prevent it ever happening again.
Trump needs to bring legal action against all of the co-conspirators in this hoax.

View attachment 786083

The co-conspirators include:

  • Former President Barack H. Obama
  • President Joe Biden
  • Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
  • Former FBI Director James Comey
  • Former WH Chief of Staff Susan Rice
  • Former National Security Director Jim Clapper
  • Former FBI Agent Andrew McCabe
  • Former CIA Director John Brennan
  • Former FBI Director Robert Mueller
  • Former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok
  • Hillary Campaign Chief Of Staff John Podesta
  • Journalist Max Boot
  • US Rep Adam Schiff
  • CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, PBS
  • The Washington Post
  • The New York Times
  • US Rep. Ted Lieu
  • Robby Mook
  • Brian Stelter
  • Jim Acosta
  • Rachel Maddow
  • Benjamin Wittes
  • David Corn (Mother Jones)
  • The Democrat National Committee
The Mara-lago raid was ordered in an attempt to steal evidence of the Russian Collusion Hoax, and to help cover-up the details of that criminal conspiracy:

View attachment 786071
View attachment 786072

LINKS

So...no more trump. Ok, I accept.
 
If Durham wanted to really impress me, he would have recommended of all the people on your list that:
  1. They be forever bared from office ever agin.
  2. If they are currently holding office, they be fired.
  3. They be forever barred from working for the government ever again.
  4. They be stripped of all security clearances.
  5. They be forever barred from ever VOTING again.
  6. They be stripped of all government benefits, pension and the like.
  7. Then they be prosecuted for treason against the USA.
When they start dealing with people like this, I'll have respect for the government again.

BTW, Marc Elias on your list was not only a key player in the Russian hoax, but he was principle to engineering the 2020 election steal.

How was the election influenced again?

The investigations in questions weren't made public until after the election.

You....you do understand that cause precedes effect, yes? It doesn't follow it by weeks and months.
 
Right moron, Trump said he needed to find more votes. He didn't say we need to find illegal votes, he didn't say we need to create votes, all he said is we need to find more votes to win, which is hardly a crime because everyone says that during an election. Saying you are wanting to find more votes to win is only a crime in your warped, commie, fascist mind, jackass.

Not after the election, they don't. The votes had already been counted. The audits were done. The State had already sent in its electoral certification.

Trump lost.

And AFTER he lost, Trump demanded that more than 11,000 votes be 'found' to give him the victory he didn't earn.

And Trump threatened the officials with 'criminal offenses' when they refused.

That's unprecedented. That is not how elections are done. That you believe that's how they SHOULD be tells us more about you than it does the election.
 
Last edited:
Trump didn't say shit about 'legal' votes. What he said was:

Trump: "All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state."

And then started threatening the officials with a 'criminal offense' if they didn't.

Trump: "And you are going to find that they are — which is totally illegal, it is more illegal for you than it is for them because, you know what they did and you’re not reporting it. That’s a criminal, that’s a criminal offense.

Try again, tinfoil.



You first dipshit. The shrilary hired a foreign spy.

That's a felony you dumb bunny.

But, because she is a demofascist, she skates.
 
You first dipshit. The shrilary hired a foreign spy.

That's a felony you dumb bunny.

Really? Then why didn't Durham charge her with said felony?

Hillary was charged with absolutely nothing. Not by the Trump DOJ, not by Durham, not by anyone.

Seems your pseudo-legal gibberish about 'felonies' doesn't amount to much.
 
Really? Then why didn't Durham charge her with said felony?
Hillary was charged with absolutely nothing.

That is the POINT of this whole thread, moron. Obviously, Durham (who has no authority to charge anyone directly) didn't recommend criminal prosecution for anyone important because he was pressured NOT TO. That doesn't prove these people innocent, sweet petunia, it goes to show the level of corruption and inability in the gov policing itself.
 
That is the POINT of this whole thread, moron. Obviously, Durham (who has no authority to charge anyone directly) didn't recommend criminal prosecution for anyone important because he was pressured NOT TO.
Durham had the same authority that Mueller did.

And Mueller indicated 34 people.

Why didn't Durham indict Clinton? Or even recommend she be charged with any crime?

Clearly you're missing something.
 
How was the election influenced again?

The investigations in questions weren't made public until after the election.

You....you do understand that cause precedes effect, yes? It doesn't follow it by weeks and months.

Your party colluded with the criminal elements in the FBI, as well as Russian agents, to create a fake scandal to tamper with the election (actually, with two elections).
 
Your party colluded with the criminal elements in the FBI, as well as Russian agents, to create a fake scandal to tamper with the election (actually, with two elections).

How was the 2016 election 'interfered' with again?
 
Why didn't Durham indict Clinton? Or even recommend she be charged with any crime?

You should write him and ask him. Clearly, you're not interested in the answer since you keep asking people here who have no means or connection of knowing how Mueller indicts 34 people in an admittedly baseless fraud investigation while Durham indicts three nobodies--- two of which are let off scott free and the third just getting community service.

Maybe the DOJ threatened Durham's family?
 
You should write him and ask him. Clearly, you're not interested in the answer since you keep asking people here who have no means or connection of knowing how Mueller indicts 34 people in an admittedly baseless fraud investigation while Durham indicts three nobodies--- two of which are let off scott free and the third just getting community service.

Maybe the DOJ threatened Durham's family?
Laughing....so much for your claim about Durham not having the necessary authority. He had the same authority as Mueller, who indicted 34 people.

So you imagine crimes that Durham doesn't, felonies that Durham doesn't.

What makes you a better source than Durham on who should be charged with what?

And of the folks that Mueller indicated, 8 were convicted, 1 had charges dropped and 27 are still at large.

8 convictions and 27 standing indictments doesn't really speak to 'baseless fraud investigations', now does it?
 
How was the 2016 election 'interfered' with again?

Then-president Obama and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton colluded with the FBI and foreign agents to manufacture a fake scandal in an attempt to interfere with the 2016 presidential election. It's all in the Durham report, give it a read when you have time. You're a traitor who belongs to a party of traitors.
 
What makes you a better source than Durham on who should be charged with what?

Because jackass, if you actually READ his report, he cites these people and agencies at having CONSPIRED to throw a presidential election! And to interfere in one. He names the people and places and crimes then does zilch.

So, the only logical conclusion is that he was threatened not to indict anyone high up because it would then give fuel to proving that Trump was right all along, that his administration was conspired against as Durham concedes , that the raid at his home was to get back crossfire hurricane records they didn't want him to have because he'd use them to probe deeper. Because it is another big government cover-up you stupid ass, and our justice system is totally broken.

But your brain is obviously BROKEN. Talking to you I might as well talk to a stump. It is all just a game to you, until it starts swinging the other way, then you will call it fascism calling the GOP dictators, right, Bozo? But so long as Dems walk free, you see no evil.
 
Then-president Obama and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton colluded with the FBI and foreign agents to manufacture a fake scandal in an attempt to interfere with the 2016 presidential election. It's all in the Durham report, give it a read when you have time. You're a traitor who belongs to a party of traitors.

And where in the Durham report does it Obama and Clinton colluded to manufacture a fake scandal?
 
Because jackass, if you actually READ his report, he cites these people and agencies at having CONSPIRED to throw a presidential election! And to interfere in one. He names the people and places and crimes then does zilch.

Laughing.....so you're literally arguing that you know more about the law, what constitutes a crime than Durham.

I want to be sure I heard you right.
 

Forum List

Back
Top