Anyone Still Believing in the Evolution Fraud Should Watch This

Anyone truly wondering about this (and people should always wonder) I'd recommend this talk by James Tour, one of the most cited living scientists and an authority on nano-technology and synthetic chemistry. At one point he asks if there are any synthetic chemists in the audience and a few hands go up, he then tell those people to stand up and interrupt if they hear him saying anything that's untrue.

He begins by summarizing the kinds of chemistry and materials science projects he and his team work on, just top give the audience an idea of the problem domains he works in.

1723396067122.png

Fast forward to 08:10 if you want to skip his summary of his work.
 
Last edited:
A splendid narrative based on the worldwide conviction by all viewers that the granite monolith found on earth's moon did not "evolve" or create itself:


One of my websites: Mathematical Proof of Nature's God
"Math proves god." - Is that a Van Morrison tune?

I have something to share here with you that I rarely share with people: "Even my best friends they don't know that my job is turning lead into gold."

 
Uhm...

Who would have thought about God as an apt topic for an essay about mathematics? Don’t worry, the following discussion is still solidly grounded within an intelligible scientific framework. But the question of whether God can be proved mathematically is intriguing. In fact, over the centuries, several mathematicians have repeatedly tried to prove the existence of a divine being. They range from Blaise Pascal and René Descartes (in the 17th century) to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (in the 18th century) to Kurt Gödel (in the 20th century), whose writings on the subject were published as recently as 1987. And probably the most amazing thing: in a preprint study first posted in 2013 an algorithmic proof wizard checked Gödel’s logical chain of reasoning—and found it to be undoubtedly correct. Has mathematics now finally disproved the claims of all atheists?

As you probably already suspect, it has not. Gödel was indeed able to prove that the existence of something, which he defined as divine, necessarily follows from certain assumptions. But whether these assumptions are justified can be called into doubt. For example, if I assume that all cats are tricolored and know that tricolored cats are almost always female, then I can conclude: almost all cats are female. Even if the logical reasoning is correct, this of course does not hold. For the very assumption that all cats are tricolored is false. If one makes statements about observable things in our environment, such as cats, one can verify them by scientific investigations. But if it is about the proof of a divine existence, the matter becomes a little more complicated.

 
Uhm...

Who would have thought about God as an apt topic for an essay about mathematics? Don’t worry, the following discussion is still solidly grounded within an intelligible scientific framework. But the question of whether God can be proved mathematically is intriguing. In fact, over the centuries, several mathematicians have repeatedly tried to prove the existence of a divine being. They range from Blaise Pascal and René Descartes (in the 17th century) to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (in the 18th century) to Kurt Gödel (in the 20th century), whose writings on the subject were published as recently as 1987. And probably the most amazing thing: in a preprint study first posted in 2013 an algorithmic proof wizard checked Gödel’s logical chain of reasoning—and found it to be undoubtedly correct. Has mathematics now finally disproved the claims of all atheists?

As you probably already suspect, it has not. Gödel was indeed able to prove that the existence of something, which he defined as divine, necessarily follows from certain assumptions. But whether these assumptions are justified can be called into doubt. For example, if I assume that all cats are tricolored and know that tricolored cats are almost always female, then I can conclude: almost all cats are female. Even if the logical reasoning is correct, this of course does not hold. For the very assumption that all cats are tricolored is false. If one makes statements about observable things in our environment, such as cats, one can verify them by scientific investigations. But if it is about the proof of a divine existence, the matter becomes a little more complicated.

Do you have any original thoughts of your own on this subject?
 
Do you have any original thoughts of your own on this subject?
I have thoughts on evolution, but I doubt they'd be considered "original." Do you imagine you have original thoughts on most common subjects?

Maybe somebody ought to put forward your name for a MacArthur Grant.
 
Do you have any original thoughts of your own on this subject?
Chickenshit that you are: "This member limits who may view their full profile." LOL

I believe you've evolved. From what into what is an open question.

Do you know about the "granite monolith found on earth's moon?"
 
That has been debunked.

Has audio:

Evolution is generally thought to move slowly, punctuated only by significant ecological disturbances like pollution or habitat destruction. But a study published today (March 17) in Science finds that evolution may in fact happen fast enough to enable adaptation to seasonal changes that happen each year—at least in fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster).

In a large-scale controlled field experiment lasting four months, scientists documented changes to 60 percent of the flies’ genes. The researchers also observed pronounced, rapid changes to six physical characteristics related to survival from July to November.

“The pace and magnitude of these changes is unprecedented,” study coauthor Paul Schmidt, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Pennsylvania, tells The Scientist. “The pace of evolution was incredibly surprising. It’s super fast.”
 
Turtles don't become birds. Birds don't come sharks. Apes don't become human. The only reason that idiot leftist think that intra species evolution exists is because marxists told them so lol.
 

Has audio:

Evolution is generally thought to move slowly, punctuated only by significant ecological disturbances like pollution or habitat destruction. But a study published today (March 17) in Science finds that evolution may in fact happen fast enough to enable adaptation to seasonal changes that happen each year—at least in fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster).

In a large-scale controlled field experiment lasting four months, scientists documented changes to 60 percent of the flies’ genes. The researchers also observed pronounced, rapid changes to six physical characteristics related to survival from July to November.

“The pace and magnitude of these changes is unprecedented,” study coauthor Paul Schmidt, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Pennsylvania, tells The Scientist. “The pace of evolution was incredibly surprising. It’s super fast.”
They don't become human you fucking leftist faggot childless retard. You are ugly.
 
After all the odds regarding the origin of life are examined only one remains,

Odds of divine creation: 1:1.
 

Has audio:

Evolution is generally thought to move slowly, punctuated only by significant ecological disturbances like pollution or habitat destruction. But a study published today (March 17) in Science finds that evolution may in fact happen fast enough to enable adaptation to seasonal changes that happen each year—at least in fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster).

In a large-scale controlled field experiment lasting four months, scientists documented changes to 60 percent of the flies’ genes. The researchers also observed pronounced, rapid changes to six physical characteristics related to survival from July to November.

“The pace and magnitude of these changes is unprecedented,” study coauthor Paul Schmidt, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Pennsylvania, tells The Scientist. “The pace of evolution was incredibly surprising. It’s super fast.”
But in the end, they were still fruit flies.
 
That has been debunked.

Go on then, show your debunking.


Here's some of my evidence that we can see evolution.


"That's the focus of a new study by a Florida State University researcher who raised 200 generations of fruit flies to examine how they changed both in the short and long term. What he found was quite surprising."

"Fruit flies are considered an ideal species for scientists to investigate unsolved problems in evolution and genetics because it is easy to breed more than 20 generations each year. Their wings are also easy to measure, so scientists can easily identify even small changes."

"Houle then raised 200 generations of fruit flies -- it takes four years to breed that many generations -- and then individually raised some of the flies to see what, if any, changes occurred in the wings of the flies. In total, the researchers measured more than 50,000 fly wings in the course of this study and found changes in the overall shape of the wing, such as the ratio of width to length and vein locations."

What you got?
 
Back
Top Bottom