So...as mentioned in the post, you've seen the usage in the press before?
I didn't think so.
But, good attempt to become relevant.
Where did you post" press" in your post? You did post white hispanicsbeing in "print". So, being the helpful guy that I am, I simply pointed out that every census survey Americans received, had the words "white Hispanic" in one of the demographic questions. So obviously the words were "invented" to describe a specific ethnic group, such as with the 2010 census. I hope that answered your question.
If I wanted to be revelant on USMB, I'd spend as much time daily on these boards as you do. But I have quite a few other things that are more relevant to me in my life.
The item inside quotation marks is linked to the New York Times.
The next line says "Ever see that phrase in print before? "... a white Hispanic,..."
Yet you could not see that the proximate continuity....
...and, "being the helpful guy," without any ulterior motive, embarked on a search.
Did you actually find the post too nuanced, or did you have to strain to find an obscure usage of '...white Hispanic...' on the net?
If so, what could possibly by your motivation other than to deny that the Left seeks, strives, endeavors, and maneuvers
to keep the races fighting?
In simplest terms, because you are clearly a simple fellow, in every way possible, the bottom-feeding, mouth-breathing, pusillanimous Left-wing, progressive, Liberal foes of America will never let Americans Rodney-King-just-get-along.
Don't you agree?