Anyone else notice?

[M14 Shooter]

its not a red herring...

It is, as it does not address the argument under discussion, specifically, your claim that religion cannot be questioned. This statement has been disproven; your question can do nothing to defend your statement as no possible answer to your question does anything to change the fact that your statement is false.

 

[Common Sense]

its not a red herring...

It is, as it does not address the argument under discussion, specifically, your claim that religion cannot be questioned. This statement has been disproven; your question can do nothing to defend your statement as no possible answer to your question does anything to change the fact that your statement is false.

answer the rest of my questions

 

[M14 Shooter]

its not a red herring...

It is, as it does not address the argument under discussion, specifically, your claim that religion cannot be questioned. This statement has been disproven; your question can do nothing to defend your statement as no possible answer to your question does anything to change the fact that your statement is false.

answer the rest of my questions

It is in no way necessary for me to do so for my point to stand and your point to be disproven. You're wrong, I have proven you wrong, admit it, move on.

 

[Vast LWC]

Hmm, start with a completely false premise, and then run with it.

What a useless thread.

 

[Common Sense]

It is, as it does not address the argument under discussion, specifically, your claim that religion cannot be questioned. This statement has been disproven; your question can do nothing to defend your statement as no possible answer to your question does anything to change the fact that your statement is false.

answer the rest of my questions

It is in no way necessary for me to do so for my point to stand and your point to be disproven. You're wrong, I have proven you wrong, admit it, move on.

nope it just proves your an idiot who runs away from questions he doesnt know how to answer.

it also proves that you dont question religion. since you wont question creationism. you believe in something that has been proven to be false time and time again. just admit it, your faith isnt so strong when your faced with adversity.

 

[M14 Shooter]

answer the rest of my questions

It is in no way necessary for me to do so for my point to stand and your point to be disproven. You're wrong, I have proven you wrong, admit it, move on.

nope it just proves your an idiot who runs away from questions he doesnt know how to answer.

When you're able to ask a question relevant to the point at hand, I'll answer it.

When you figure out how to do that, rather than offer up useless red herrings to cover the fact that you've been proven wrong, please let us all know.

Until then, wipe the tears from your eyes, the snot from your nose and run along.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

answer the rest of my questions

It is in no way necessary for me to do so for my point to stand and your point to be disproven. You're wrong, I have proven you wrong, admit it, move on.

nope it just proves your an idiot who runs away from questions he doesnt know how to answer.

it also proves that you dont question religion. since you wont question creationism. you believe in something that has been proven to be false time and time again. just admit it, your faith isnt so strong when your faced with adversity.

Creationism has been proven to be false?

Are you high?

 

[M14 Shooter]

it also proves that you dont question religion...

Its apparent from -this- that reading comprehension as a basic educational skill isn't as highly valued as it used to be...

 

[Cecilie1200]

Oh you mean like that recent string of Rs who kept trying to **** aides or get head in the airport with a wide stance who were then labled democrats by Fox news repetedly?

What you fail to see is it is YOUR side who claims to be MORE Godly that defends the creeps in your midst.

So the problem isn't actually the creepy, deviant behavior, it's the fact that Republicans know and publicly acknowledge that people should aspire to better. Since Democrats embrace and revel in being scumbags and openly disdain moral behavior, that makes it all okay. Is that how this works?

 

[Charles_Main]

No, I've never noticed that.

Perhaps you should pay closer attention my dear.

 

[Charles_Main]

Oh you mean like that recent string of Rs who kept trying to **** aides or get head in the airport with a wide stance who were then labled democrats by Fox news repetedly?

What you fail to see is it is YOUR side who claims to be MORE Godly that defends the creeps in your midst.

So the problem isn't actually the creepy, deviant behavior, it's the fact that Republicans know and publicly acknowledge that people should aspire to better. Since Democrats embrace and revel in being scumbags and openly disdain moral behavior, that makes it all okay. Is that how this works?

Yep that is basically how the Liberal mind works. They believe liberals are so good, that a few small rapes, or what ever are not enough to ruin their whole career. :0

 

[Cecilie1200]

When ever someone on the left is accused of Rape or sexual misconduct the liberals always defend them? Make disparaging remarks about the charges and generally claim nothing important happened?

Of course if a Republican even smiles at a pretty girl those same people are all hot to prosecute for something, anything.

What's your point?

That there is something ingrained in a political stance that would allow Liberals to defend sexually delinquent Liberals?

Are you picking the scabs of the Clinton scandal again?

That Conservatives drum sexually delinquent Conservatives out of their ranks without fanfare?

Or is it a slow day and you're trolling?

I think his point is that there's something ingrained in a certain worldview that inclines the person who holds it to be a liberal, a hypocrite, and a scumbag. If it's NOT his point, then it's mine.

Like Clinton is the only Democrat/liberal to ever have a sex scandal and be defended to hell and back.

Conservatives DO drum their bad apples out of their ranks, but more than that, liberals DON'T.

I'd say that's a significant and legitimate point to make. But then, I'm not a liberal, so I'm not prevented from recognizing and criticizing bad leftist behavior.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Creationism has been proven to be false?

Yes - by the fact that The Bible doesn't explain plate tectonics.

 

[Common Sense]

youre really shallow. you wont answer my questions at all and make assumptions about which you know nothing. first you said you shouldnt question religion. then you said you should. so which is it mr. flip flopper.

if you dont question the bible, i can understand you stand point that word of the bible is the word of god and should not be questioned and taken literally. but you accept the premise that the bible is to be questioned then you raise the suspicion that the events of the bible are actually false.

then by that reasoning if only some of the bible is true, and some of it is false, how can you say that the bible is accurate? how can you say that we should trust everything in the bible. since there is not way to prove the existence of god without faith there is no way to prove the accuracy or truthfulness of the bible.

you cant make a logical argument such as this. everything always falls back to well its in the bible so it must be true, or if it isnt in the bible god still made it true. there is no logic in your argument at all.

 

[8537]

Conservatives DO drum their bad apples out of their ranks, but more than that, liberals DON'T.

Really?

Sincerely,
Diapers Vitter.

and which party promoted a man into leadership position in congress at the same time he was wearing a police monitoring bracelet b/c he was under house arrest for committing a felony?

 

[rdean]

When ever someone on the left is accused of Rape or sexual misconduct the liberals always defend them? Make disparaging remarks about the charges and generally claim nothing important happened?

Of course if a Republican even smiles at a pretty girl those same people are all hot to prosecute for something, anything.

Guilty until proven innocent. Some went into the military to protect the constitution.

 

[Common Sense]

Macro-evolution observed in the laboratory | Digital Bits Skeptic

"Indeed, it’s hard to simulate our planet’s biodiversity in a laboratory, because all laboratories are much smaller than the planet and have been operating for a far shorter period of time. Nevertheless, we can now say that macro-evolution has been observed in the laboratory under carefully controlled conditions, and that the results can be replicated. The results are described in a paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences titled Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli.
In 1988, scientists at Michigan State University created twelve population lines of E. coli so that they could watch them evolve. Since then, the bacteria have been growing under carefully controlled conditions in a culture containing low concentrations of glucose and high concentrations of citrate. Under oxic conditions (that is, when oxygen is present), E. coli cannot grow on citrate and “that inability has long been viewed as a defining characteristic of this important, diverse, and widespread species.” Many traits were observed changing over time. Creationists dismissed these changes as micro-evolution. For over 30,000 generations, the E. coli in the experiment did not evolve the ability to grow on citrate. Finally, one of the populations evolved, and gained this ability."

if evolution can be observed by science, does this not provide doubt into the idea of creationism? of are you just gonna say that god is responsible for evolution as well?

 

[M14 Shooter]

If evolution can be observed by science, does this not provide doubt into the idea of creationism? of are you just gonna say that god is responsible for evolution as well?

This preumes that evolution is not the mechanism through which creation works.

It amazes me that supposedly - though likely necessarily self-described - enlightened people continually fail to see the false dichotomy that is evolution v creation.

:shrug:

 

[M14 Shooter]

youre really shallow. you wont answer my questions at all...

As I said:
Ask a question that's relevant to the topic under discussion and I'll answer it.
As it stands, all we have is your disproven statement followed by your red herring.

 

[M14 Shooter]

if you dont question the bible, i can understand you stand point that word of the bible is the word of god and should not be questioned and taken literally. but you accept the premise that the bible is to be questioned then you raise the suspicion that the events of the bible are actually false.

What you fail to recognize - likely because it isn't addressed by the script you're following - is that any number of people can agree that the Bible is the Word of God and then have any number of interpretations as to what those words mean and how they should be applied.

Once you're able to create your own thoughts on this topic, rather than ape the words of some set of websites you visit because they confirm what you want to the believe, you'll be able to add something to this conversation.