I notice your source only goes to 2008. Look at the current ones and be fair
I've got a picture in my head from somewhere (so its on the web for sure) 2012(?) - 92% (might be 97%) There's a graph/chart that's mostly pale red - I believe it lines up 76.1% for 2015, 80% for 2014. (Those are rulings from the 9th that were overturned by the SCOTUS.) It does have different categories, overturned, vacated, reversed, etc. I believe I posted a linky to something about the 9th's track record on here responding to... Lewdog I think. I don't think that's the picture I've got in my head, but I'll look in a few.
Well here's the one I'd posted here -
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: U.S. Supreme Court again rejects most 9th Circuit decisions
Article posted in 2011 says "The 9th Circuit's track record tends to be above average most years: two years ago, 94% of the circuit's cases were reversed.
While the 9th Circuit remains predominantly Democrat-appointed, the composition has shifted since President George W. Bush named seven conservative jurists to the court. President Obama, by contrast, has succeeded in getting only one of the appeals court's four vacancies filled since he took office.
The conservative faction on the 9th Circuit is often outvoted when the full court is asked to rehear a divisive case. But they have been getting the Supreme Court's attention — and intervention — by banding together to write dissenting opinions.
Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, named to the 9th Circuit by President Reagan, is a frequent author of the red flags sent to the justices in Washington.
"If there is going to be a change in the interpretation of a constitutional provision or statutory provisions, that's the province of the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court has told us any number of times that our job is to apply existing Supreme Court interpretation," said O'Scannlain, who prides himself on usually being on the vindicated dissenting side when the high court reverses 9th Circuit decisions.
Asked if he writes or joins the dissents with an eye to calling the justices' attention to a ruling he disagrees with, O'Scannlain said: "We hear anecdotal evidence that they are not ignored."
Note, there is apparently another article from this source in 2009, I'd quoted from it but apparently not linked it on here (oops) EDIT - ah there it is on the first page heh -
U.S. Supreme Court looks over 9th Circuit's shoulder
Long-running trend
But the 9th Circuit's record this term, with 94% of its cases reversed at least in part, extends a long-running trend of being disproportionately overturned. The 9th Circuit -- the only one in which a majority of judges were appointed by Democratic presidents -- has had a larger-than-average share of its cases overturned in eight of the last 10 years.
"It's true that the 9th Circuit is slightly more liberal, generally speaking, than the Supreme Court, and that probably accounts for the more frequent reversal rate the 9th Circuit has," said Jeffrey L. Fisher, who teaches at Stanford Law School. But he attributes the appeals court's dominance of the high court docket to the unique issues emanating from the diverse region it covers.
"A lot of important policy cases involving interesting and difficult questions come out of the 9th Circuit. The West is known for its experimentation, the initiative process -- things that bring constitutional questions to the fore more often," Fisher said.
He argued before the high court this term for a Washington state prisoner who contended that illegal jury instructions led to his murder conviction. The case was one of the 13 from the 9th Circuit fully reversed by the justices.
------
I don't see the chart one in my browser history
