While Phil is entitled to his opinions, I just can't find one single reason to idolize a guy who thinks black people were more "Godly" under segregation
He didn't say they were better off under segregation, because those are your words in which you put into his mouth, and you have done this just to stir up crap, and so you are a crap stirrer trying to stir up some crap out of nothing or better yet out of thin air you do this in your life. They may have been more Godly under oppression, just as any people would be under oppression, and it doesn't say that you can't be happy knowing that you have God in your life while under oppression or during any other bad circumstances maybe found in your life.
Why is this ? It is because if you believe in God, then no man can oppress you ever, even though he can try to, but you are stronger than he is, and so he could never steal your soul or your happiness, because you have already won against him, he just doesn't realize it yet.
Fear not man whom can take your life in the first death, but fear him who can take your life for the second death, and therefore it is he whom holds the keys to life within his own hands, and if you are held within his hands safely by your own choosing, then there shall your eternal life be also.
He said that they were seemingly happier back when he knew them as a young man (the ones that he knew), and that he was just like them, and they all worked for the farmers, and that he worked in the fields with them, and they were a more Godly people back then is what he noticed about them it seemed, and he never saw them once walk away saying that the white man was bad or to blame for their work load as was found in their current lives. They all together were poor and worked hard together Phil and the Black folk, and the thing that they shared most of all was the uniting as Christians in which helped them all get through the tougher economic times in which he remembered along with them in their lives as well.
He compares gay sex to bestiality, and who thinks that women should be married off at the age of 15 or 16 because if you wait until they're 20, it's too late. And yes, he said that. I've seen the video.
Well these days if one
waits to long to get married, it probably is to late for them to get a woman who is pure and untouched, so Phil believes the old way of hopefully catching a woman before she has been around so to speak. Now what is wrong with teaching that to the young men and women of today these things, and especially since the world has changed so much from the way he remembered it was before back in his day ? When a woman and man would wait on sex before marriage, their marriages usually lasted a whole lot longer.
They got married earlier back then in hopes to get a woman that will have only been with the one man that is to be married, and for the man it is the same when it comes to marrying the woman. It was also better for the bearing of his and her children, and this from a more innocent stand point in which would be found between them in the relationship in such a case.
It is then for all of them to make it for their whole lives together afterwards, as this was the thinking of the time is what I think. Now what's wrong with this in your mind again ?
He thinks probably that gay sex ranks right up there and/or to the degree of a sin that bestiality represents, or with any other sin that is in that category of sins in which he looks at them in his mind as being purty bad ones. That is just his interpretation of what is found within the word that he has read.
It's just his belief is all, and the crap stirring GQ interviewer knew he thought or believed in this way, so he set Phil up to say it from the mountain top in hopes to destroy Phil and the dynasty by his deceptive tactics, and he figured that he would have it by a landslide because of the opinions from those the GQ interviewer felt were way on stronger than the numbers Phil had.
It back fired on them, and rightly so.
I respect people who respect others, and Phil only respects other straight white guys - not women, not blacks, not gays. In other words, he's a Republican.
And your a stone cold bigot, but you try and cloak it or hide it. WHY ?
