Finally.
After some 30-plus mass murderers in recent memory, with almost exclusively leftist connections, who murderered schoolchildren, mothers in their beds, etc., at last we finally get one with clear right-wing connections. And their first victims weren't schoolchildren or mothers, they were armed police officers. It was pretty easy, of course, they shot them in the back.
But your question was: "Who would have ******* guessed it?"?
To answer your question: No one would have guessed that. Because such insane mass murderers have almost always been leftists, or people with connections to leftists. Now we finally have one with rightist connections... which does little to alter the overwhelmingly leftist character of nearly all the mass murderers to date.
Since you brought the subject up in this thread.
I see the usual board leftsts are now doing their best to pretend that finding a right-wing nutcase is "usual" or "common" or "expected"... even though the overwhelming majority of them have always been left-connected. I expect no less from liars such as the leftists present on this board.
Does this mean you are no longer going to insist that a person't political bent has NOTHING TO DO WITH his being a mass murderer? That's not longer true? Despite so many lefitsts insisting that it was irrelevant, all these years when leftists have been gunning down colleges, post offices, shoping malls, and even elementary schools? Now we can finally assume that a murderer's political persuasion CAN be taken into account?
It's about time. So let's see. Dozens of leftist mass murderers, and one rightist mass murderer. Since we now CAN take political persuasion into account, what does that tell us about the FAR more likely political group to be committing mass murders against helpless victims?