Anti-BDS Bill - Bravo

[American_Jihad]

Horowitz Freedom Center Targets BDS Supporters with Campus Poster Campaign
Posters allege BDS activists have “allied themselves with Palestinian terrorists” and “perpetrate…Jew hatred on this campus.”
April 14, 2016
Stop the Jew Hatred on Campus

Visit Stop the Jew Hatred on Campus.

The David Horowitz Freedom Center claimed credit today for posters that appeared on the campus of UC-Santa Barbara attacking the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel as a “Hamas-inspired genocidal campaign to destroy the world’s only Jewish state” and naming individual students and faculty members who promote BDS on the Santa Barbara campus. David Horowitz, President of the Freedom Center, commented, “We’ve decided to get up close and personal with merchants of Jew hatred on our campuses.”

Several versions of the posters were hung on campus late last night in a guerilla campaign to draw attention to the problem of Jew hatred at UCSB. In addition to defining the BDS movement as a genocidal campaign to wipe out Israel, one poster names a number of prominent campus BDS activists and states, “The following students and faculty at UC Santa Barbara have allied themselves with Palestinian terrorists to perpetrate BDS and Jew Hatred on this campus.”

A second poster displays a photo of armed Palestinian militants with the caption “BDS: The Final Solution to the Israel Problem,” while a third features an enlarged photo of retired UC-Santa Cruz professor Angela Davis who is known for her anti-Israel activism emblazoned with the words “Communist Anti-Israel BDS Supporter.”

All three posters contain the hashtag #StoptheJewHatredonCampus, a reference to the Freedom Center’s campaign and website of the same name, and also include a link to the HorowitzFreedomCenter.org website.

The posters are part of a larger Freedom Center campaign titled Stop the Jew Hatred on Campus which seeks to confront the agents of campus anti-Semitism and refute the genocidal lies about the Jewish state spread by Palestinian terrorists and their campus allies. These lies include the claims that Israel occupies Palestinian land and that Israel is an apartheid state. These lies and rebuttals to them may be found on the campaign website,www.StoptheJewHatredonCampus.org.

...

Horowitz said that UCSB is only the first of several universities to be targeted by the Stop the Jew Hatred on Campus campaign. “Jew haters on other campuses are going to wake up some morning soon and see their pictures on posters holding them responsible for their anti Semitic thoughts and deeds.”

Horowitz Freedom Center Targets BDS Supporters with Campus Poster Campaign

 

[American_Jihad]

Looks like sanders has a hive of self loathing Jews, got to watch this bitch she has those bipolar libtart eyes...
FACT Check: Is Sanders Director Simone Zimmerman a BDS Supporter?
April 13, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

The appointment of anti-Israel activist Simone Zimmerman as the Jewish Outreach Director for the Bernie Sanders campaign in New York has met with a great deal of controversy.

There's no ambiguity whatsoever that Simone Zimmerman hates Israel.

...

Simone Zimmerman has participated in these types of protests including one at the Jewish Federation in New York.

It's extremely difficult to argue that pushing for divestment from Israel is not BDS. And you can't participate in BDS, support BDS activists and groups and then claim that you're not for it.

Simone Zimmerman and If Not Now don't like to use those three nasty letters because they know how unpopular it makes them. The response to Zimmerman's appointment is a demonstration of that. But trying to launder your divestment agenda doesn't change the fact. BDS by any other name is just as toxic.

FACT Check: Is Sanders Director Simone Zimmerman a BDS Supporter?

 

[Phoenall]

OK, but BDS will still be able to boycott those companies.

And the way things are going they will have to do it in secret and in Palestine. Try to do it in the US and they face arrest and possibly removal from the country

They can't make BDS illegal. If they could they would. But they can't so they, in desperation, use the back door approach.

Companies can still be boycotted. This law just puts them in a difficult place.

BDS has already been made illegal in Palestine because of the damage it has done to the economy. Some European nations have now made it illegal under terrorism laws, while some US states are looking at making it illegal for the same reasons.

OK, but will enforcing laws under false premise hold up in court?

Where is the false premise then, if the people arrested are known Nazi activists with a record of racist attacks then the court will have no choice but to convict. The problem comes when the people arrested have no past history, then the case is much harder to prove. Get a few arrests under their belts and the case becomes easier. Of course video evidence can always be used to show they were acting in a racist manner and inciting violence. The law books set the rules and it would be up to the defence to prove that there was indeed a false premise in the law applied, not an easy thing to do.

 

[Phoenall]

OK, but BDS will still be able to boycott those companies.

True but what good will it do them when they lose so much government support and business. How will they manage to survive when the orders placed are cancelled and given to their rivals, or if they are on a black list produced by the government.

OK, but that is a problem created by the government. It has nothing to do with the BDS movement.

It has everything to do with the BDS movement as it has been infiltrated by neo Marxists and Nazis who are using it as a front to attack the Jews. Once that happened it no longer became anything but a racist terrorist group.

There is no evidence of that.

Yes there is as the same people are found taking part in ALF/PETA riots, G10 summit riots, hopenothate riots, anti EDL riots and manning BDS lines. Every one traced back to a neo Marxist/islamonazi cell.

The benefits of having such a small nation and plenty of CCTV camera's

 

[Phoenall]

reported

 

[P F Tinmore]

OK, but BDS will still be able to boycott those companies.

And the way things are going they will have to do it in secret and in Palestine. Try to do it in the US and they face arrest and possibly removal from the country

They can't make BDS illegal. If they could they would. But they can't so they, in desperation, use the back door approach.

Companies can still be boycotted. This law just puts them in a difficult place.

BDS has already been made illegal in Palestine because of the damage it has done to the economy. Some European nations have now made it illegal under terrorism laws, while some US states are looking at making it illegal for the same reasons.

OK, but will enforcing laws under false premise hold up in court?

Where is the false premise then, if the people arrested are known Nazi activists with a record of racist attacks then the court will have no choice but to convict. The problem comes when the people arrested have no past history, then the case is much harder to prove. Get a few arrests under their belts and the case becomes easier. Of course video evidence can always be used to show they were acting in a racist manner and inciting violence. The law books set the rules and it would be up to the defence to prove that there was indeed a false premise in the law applied, not an easy thing to do.

 

[Phoenall]

And the way things are going they will have to do it in secret and in Palestine. Try to do it in the US and they face arrest and possibly removal from the country

They can't make BDS illegal. If they could they would. But they can't so they, in desperation, use the back door approach.

Companies can still be boycotted. This law just puts them in a difficult place.

BDS has already been made illegal in Palestine because of the damage it has done to the economy. Some European nations have now made it illegal under terrorism laws, while some US states are looking at making it illegal for the same reasons.

OK, but will enforcing laws under false premise hold up in court?

Where is the false premise then, if the people arrested are known Nazi activists with a record of racist attacks then the court will have no choice but to convict. The problem comes when the people arrested have no past history, then the case is much harder to prove. Get a few arrests under their belts and the case becomes easier. Of course video evidence can always be used to show they were acting in a racist manner and inciting violence. The law books set the rules and it would be up to the defence to prove that there was indeed a false premise in the law applied, not an easy thing to do.

Yes that is all you post, one day we might get something of real interest from you.

 

[American_Jihad]

The BDS Movement's Terror Ties
Washington think tank provides insight into malevolent workings of pro-BDS group and its terrorist connections.
April 27, 2016
Ari Lieberman

...

According to research conducted by the FDD, the AMP is extremely active on college campuses and one of the driving forces of the BDS movement. The organization provides training, funding and propaganda material for SJP campus groups across the United States. In 2014, the group spent $100,000 on campus activities, the bulk of which was channeled into anti-Israel, pro-BDS causes.

Even more disquieting is the fact that several current members of the AMP or individuals who are otherwise tied to the AMP were former members of groups that were shut down or held civilly liable by the United States for funneling money to the Hamas terrorist group. That figure includes three individuals who had previously belonged to the now defunct and notorious Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), the Hamas front group that according to the U.S. Treasury Department sent approximately $12.4 million overseas to fill the Hamas coffers.

Another four members of the AMP gravitated from two other terrorist front groups, similarly shut down or held civilly liable by the United States. In total, at least seven individuals who are current AMP members or otherwise perform work for the group had prior associations to organizations targeted by the United States because of their involvement in terror funding.

Judging from its literature and propaganda, the AMP seeks nothing short of the destruction of Israel. It was founded in 2005 and according to a video posted on its Facebook page, was chartered to “educate Americans on ‘Palestine’ and to keep its cause alive.” A poster in Arabic on display in their Chicago headquarters betrays a more ominous purpose. The poster includes the phrase “No Jew will live among them in Jerusalem.” Ironically, part of the AMP’s propaganda includes the false canard that Jews ethnically cleansed ‘Palestine’ of its indigenous Arab inhabitants but the AMP sees nothing wrong with ethnically cleansing the land of its Jewish inhabitants.

...

SJP activists frequently disrupt Israeli or Jewish themed events thus preventing students from expanding their understanding of the complex conflict. The most recent example is the disgraceful episode which occurred at San Francisco State University on April 7, when SJP hooligans disrupted a talk given by Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat while helpless police stood idly by. A week later, a leader of Harvard Law School’s SJP, Husam El-Qoulaq, hurled an anti-Semitic trope at an Israeli member of parliament during a question and answer session.

The SJP’s outrageous antics have prompted strong pushback with a growing number of state lawmakers calling for the group’s expulsion from college campuses. The FDD’s research into the AMP-BDS-SJP-Hamas connection adds a new dimension to the activities of the SJP and its genocidal sponsors. The time has come for university and college officials to act more resolutely in confronting the SJP. Their presence on any college campus represents a malign influence that must be eradicated.

The BDS Movement's Terror Ties

 

[P F Tinmore]

Florida Retirees Drag Exclusive Country Clubs Into BDS Battlefield

G4S currently employs 8,000 people in Israel and has contracts with Israel’s prison system, for which it also provides security equipment. On March 10, G4S announced that it would be ending all of its Israeli contracts beginning 2017. The company stated that the decision was purely financial and not a response to pressures from the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, though BDS activists marked the announcement as a win.

Speaking on behalf of Levine, Monica Lewman-Garcia explained that “G4S does not support any movement to boycott Israel.” This sentiment was echoed in a statement released Friday after the meeting, in which G4S reiterated “that it does not support the anti-Israel boycott by BDS or any other group,” and maintains that the decision to end their contracts in Israel was on “strategic and commercial grounds.”

The battle between locals and G4S comes in the same month that Florida Governor Rick Scott was welcomed at the Jewish Federation of South Palm Beach County to celebrate a new law that will ban Florida businesses from contracting with companies that support BDS.

The Jewish Federation's Levin is adamant that G4S should be “scrutinized” by this new Florida legislation.

read more: Florida retirees drag exclusive country clubs into BDS battlefield - Jewish World News

What a zoo!

 

[American_Jihad]

S-BDS: The Rise of Stealth BDS
Jew-washing BDS.
April 29, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

By now everyone knows that the three letters BDS stand for an economic boycott of Israel. Some have encountered BDS protesters howling and raging outside Jewish stores and synagogues. The tactic of an anti-Jewish boycott, originally developed by Nazi Germany and then deployed by the Arab League, is controversial outside the grimier corners of the anti-Israel left. And so BDS can never go mainstream.

The next stage of BDS is a stealth boycott. Stealth BDS is BDS without the nasty label and the negative associations that go with it. It’s BDS without the stigma, the three bad letters or the bad aftertaste.

Stealth BDS is targeted at the Jewish community because that is where BDS is most controversial. Its organizations operate by appropriating Jewish names, such as If Not Now, T’ruah or J Street U in order to Jew-wash their tactics by making their hatred appear to be Jewish. They avoid openly endorsing BDS, occasionally they will even claim to oppose it while arguing that their opposition to Israel is the best way to beat BDS.

Their way however is just BDS without the label.

Rather than talking about BDS, Stealth BDS groups will claim that they are just “fighting the occupation”. They recruit young left-wing activists with Jewish last names and claim that they are the “voice of a new generation” being marginalized by the Jewish establishment who would otherwise leave the community and go full BDS. They will insist that by meeting their demands, the Jewish community will defang BDS.

But their demands, when they actually get around to them, usually sound a whole lot like BDS. And these groups, even when they claim to be anti-BDS, have a history of providing platforms to BDS supporters, endorsing them, signing on to their demands and fighting their battles for them.

A typical problem of Stealth BDS (SBDS) came up when Bernie Sanders hired Simone Zimmerman, a radical anti-Israel activist, to conduct Jewish outreach for his campaign. Zimmerman was with If Not Now, a group that protests outside the offices of Jewish organizations. Simone Zimmerman had defended BDS supporters, signed on to a letter by the BDS group JVP and spoken positively about BDS.

...

SBDS insists that the Jewish community must provide a platform for BDS or it will alienate SBDSers. It demands that the Jewish community oppose Israel or it will turn off SBDSers. It demands that Jewish charities boycott parts of Israel claimed by Islamic terrorist groups and the Jews living inside them. It dedicates its efforts to harassing Jewish organizations until they join their SBDS boycott.

The Jewish community can either try to pander to Stealth BDS. Or it can show this even more dishonest version of BDS and its dirty anti-Israel donors the door.

S-BDS: The Rise of Stealth BDS

 

[P F Tinmore]

Rights-Based Approach
The BDS Call identifies the fundamental rights that correspond to the three main segments of the indigenous people of Palestine. Based on international law and universal principles of human rights, the Call urges various forms of boycott against Israel until it fully complies with its obligations under international law by:

1. Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands occupied in June 1967 and dismantling the Wall;
2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and
3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.

The BDS Call, signed by over 170 Palestinian organizations, political parties, trade union federations, and mass movements, expresses the collective aspirations of the Palestinian people by asserting that only the fulfillment of the Call's three basic demands would satisfy the minimal requirements for the people of Palestine to exercise the inalienable right to self determination.

The BDS Call has laid "the predicate" for transcending the failed official Palestinian policy of reducing Palestinian rights to the attainment of a Bantustan under Israel's overall control.

It presents a popular Palestinian response to the incessant concessions by the so-called leadership over basic rights. Palestinian officials, lacking a democratic mandate and running after the trappings of power, narrow economic interests, and privilege, have through years of a US-Israeli designed and managed "peace process" effectively surrendered the right of return as it is defined by the UN; accepted Israel's occupation and colonization of key parts of the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem; expunged the 1948 Palestinians, citizens of Israel, from the very definition of the Palestinian people, indirectly legitimizing Israeli apartheid; forsaken the moral high ground by accepting a symmetry between the "claims of both sides;" and played along Israel's public relations campaign of portraying its colonial conflict with the Palestinian people as merely one over some disputed land.

By avoiding the prescription of any particular political formula, the BDS Call insists, instead, on the necessity of including the three basic, irreducible rights above in any just and legal solution. It presents a platform that not only unifies Palestinians everywhere in the face of accelerating fragmentation but also appeals to international civil society by evoking the same universal principles of freedom, justice and equal rights that were upheld by the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa and the civil rights movement in the United States, among many others.

In this way, the BDS movement has dragged Israel and its well-financed lobby groups onto a battlefield where the moral clarity of the Palestinian struggle for self determination, justice, freedom and equality neutralizes -- even outweighs -- Israel's military power and financial prowess. BDS is the classic right over might paradigm, with the international public increasingly recognizing that Israel's criminality and impunity place a moral burden on all people of conscience to act fast, and with effectiveness, political suaveness and nuance.

BDS: A Global Movement for Freedom & Justice - Al-Shabaka

 

[Hollie]

Anti-Israel BDS movement dealt series of setbacks in state legislatures

It’s been a BDS year for the anti-Israel BDS movement — bad, difficult and substandard.

The once-potent Boycott, Divest and Sanctions campaign has suffered a series of setbacks in state legislatures, where bills to penalize companies that target Israel are garnering bipartisan support.

The state legislative drive kicked off last year with the passage of bills in Illinois and South Carolina. This year, another 20 states are considering similar legislation. Bills already have reached the desks of three Republican governors: Arizona’s Doug Ducey, Indiana’s Mike Pence and Florida’s Rick Scott.

While state legislatures in the past have approved resolutions condemning the BDS movement, the latest wave of legislation has teeth. The bills prohibit the state from engaging in business transactions with companies that participate in boycotts of Israel or Israeli companies.

 

[docmauser1]

Rights-Based Approach
The BDS Call identifies the fundamental rights that correspond to the three main segments of the indigenous people of Palestine. Based on international law and universal principles of human rights, the Call urges various forms of boycott against Israel until it fully complies with its obligations under international law by:

1. Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands occupied in June 1967 and dismantling the Wall;
2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and
3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.

The BDS Call, signed by over 170 Palestinian organizations, political parties, trade union federations, and mass movements, expresses the collective aspirations of the Palestinian people by asserting that only the fulfillment of the Call's three basic demands would satisfy the minimal requirements for the people of Palestine to exercise the inalienable right to self determination.
The BDS Call has laid "the predicate" for transcending the failed official Palestinian policy of reducing Palestinian rights to the attainment of a Bantustan under Israel's overall control.
It presents a popular Palestinian response to the incessant concessions by the so-called leadership over basic rights. Palestinian officials, lacking a democratic mandate and running after the trappings of power, narrow economic interests, and privilege, have through years of a US-Israeli designed and managed "peace process" effectively surrendered the right of return as it is defined by the UN; accepted Israel's occupation and colonization of key parts of the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem; expunged the 1948 Palestinians, citizens of Israel, from the very definition of the Palestinian people, indirectly legitimizing Israeli apartheid; forsaken the moral high ground by accepting a symmetry between the "claims of both sides;" and played along Israel's public relations campaign of portraying its colonial conflict with the Palestinian people as merely one over some disputed land.
By avoiding the prescription of any particular political formula, the BDS Call insists, instead, on the necessity of including the three basic, irreducible rights above in any just and legal solution. It presents a platform that not only unifies Palestinians everywhere in the face of accelerating fragmentation but also appeals to international civil society by evoking the same universal principles of freedom, justice and equal rights that were upheld by the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa and the civil rights movement in the United States, among many others.
In this way, the BDS movement has dragged Israel and its well-financed lobby groups onto a battlefield where the moral clarity of the Palestinian struggle for self determination, justice, freedom and equality neutralizes -- even outweighs -- Israel's military power and financial prowess. BDS is the classic right over might paradigm, with the international public increasingly recognizing that Israel's criminality and impunity place a moral burden on all people of conscience to act fast, and with effectiveness, political suaveness and nuance.
BDS: A Global Movement for Freedom & Justice - Al-Shabaka

What a load of bullshit, of course.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Anti-Israel BDS movement dealt series of setbacks in state legislatures

It’s been a BDS year for the anti-Israel BDS movement — bad, difficult and substandard.

The once-potent Boycott, Divest and Sanctions campaign has suffered a series of setbacks in state legislatures, where bills to penalize companies that target Israel are garnering bipartisan support.

The state legislative drive kicked off last year with the passage of bills in Illinois and South Carolina. This year, another 20 states are considering similar legislation. Bills already have reached the desks of three Republican governors: Arizona’s Doug Ducey, Indiana’s Mike Pence and Florida’s Rick Scott.

While state legislatures in the past have approved resolutions condemning the BDS movement, the latest wave of legislation has teeth. The bills prohibit the state from engaging in business transactions with companies that participate in boycotts of Israel or Israeli companies.

Of course none of this makes BDS illegal, it just puts companies between a rock and a hard place.

 

[Hollie]

Anti-Israel BDS movement dealt series of setbacks in state legislatures

It’s been a BDS year for the anti-Israel BDS movement — bad, difficult and substandard.

The once-potent Boycott, Divest and Sanctions campaign has suffered a series of setbacks in state legislatures, where bills to penalize companies that target Israel are garnering bipartisan support.

The state legislative drive kicked off last year with the passage of bills in Illinois and South Carolina. This year, another 20 states are considering similar legislation. Bills already have reached the desks of three Republican governors: Arizona’s Doug Ducey, Indiana’s Mike Pence and Florida’s Rick Scott.

While state legislatures in the past have approved resolutions condemning the BDS movement, the latest wave of legislation has teeth. The bills prohibit the state from engaging in business transactions with companies that participate in boycotts of Israel or Israeli companies.

Of course none of this makes BDS illegal, it just puts companies between a rock and a hard place.

With a little bit examination and evaluation, the agenda of the BDS'ers is quite apparent. It's really a matter of the BDS'ers being equated with the silly flotilla stunts as just another failed tactic of islamists and far leftists (the darlings of the surrender monkey crowd), to press their agenda of hate and derision.

 

[montelatici]

• Friday 11 March 2016

G4S leaving Israel shows that the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign is winning
The Foreign Office and the Business Department have issued guidance to UK businesses warning them of the reputational risk of operating in illegal settlements


Not only have many student campaigns convinced their universities to drop G4S, butglobally many organisations – public and private – have dropped G4S. At the end of last year Labour’s National Executive Committee decided to end their conference security contract with G4S following a discussion about their complicity with human rights abuses.....
G4S weren’t the first company to be targeted by the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement. The campaign has already had a string of successes.

Veolia, a French corporation, came under the spotlight because of their involvement in the development of a tram system connecting West Jerusalem to Israel’s illegal settlements in occupied East Jerusalem.

Is the BDS campaign in Israel having its South Africa moment?

 

[Hollie]

Another failure for the BDS'ers.

As we see, the agenda of the BDS'ers is not pro-Pal'istanian but intended only to pin prick the Israelis.

So more Arabs-Moslems in the disputed territories are jobless. Who cares. The UNRWA welfare fraud is there as a forever money spigot to perpetuate the invention of 'Pal'istanians.

Backfire: Hundreds of Palestinians Lose Jobs After Activists Push to Boycott Israeli Company that Scarlett Johansson Promoted

Backfire: Hundreds of Palestinians Lose Jobs After Activists Push to Boycott Israeli Company that Scarlett Johansson Promoted

Hundreds of Palestinian workers have lost their jobs following a boycott campaign against SodaStream, an Israeli company that manufactures home kitchen fizzy drink machines once promoted by Hollywood actress Scarlett Johansson.

SodaStream was a prominent target of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Campaign and CODEPINK, because it operated a factory in the West Bank, territory that Palestinians claim as theirs.

 

[P F Tinmore]

• 
  
  
  • Friday 11 March 2016

G4S leaving Israel shows that the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign is winning
The Foreign Office and the Business Department have issued guidance to UK businesses warning them of the reputational risk of operating in illegal settlements


Not only have many student campaigns convinced their universities to drop G4S, butglobally many organisations – public and private – have dropped G4S. At the end of last year Labour’s National Executive Committee decided to end their conference security contract with G4S following a discussion about their complicity with human rights abuses.....
G4S weren’t the first company to be targeted by the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement. The campaign has already had a string of successes.

Veolia, a French corporation, came under the spotlight because of their involvement in the development of a tram system connecting West Jerusalem to Israel’s illegal settlements in occupied East Jerusalem.

Is the BDS campaign in Israel having its South Africa moment?

Now G4S is being investigated for violating Florida's anti BDS law.

Poor bastards.

 

[Hollie]

• 
  
  
  • Friday 11 March 2016

G4S leaving Israel shows that the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign is winning
The Foreign Office and the Business Department have issued guidance to UK businesses warning them of the reputational risk of operating in illegal settlements


Not only have many student campaigns convinced their universities to drop G4S, butglobally many organisations – public and private – have dropped G4S. At the end of last year Labour’s National Executive Committee decided to end their conference security contract with G4S following a discussion about their complicity with human rights abuses.....
G4S weren’t the first company to be targeted by the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement. The campaign has already had a string of successes.

Veolia, a French corporation, came under the spotlight because of their involvement in the development of a tram system connecting West Jerusalem to Israel’s illegal settlements in occupied East Jerusalem.

Is the BDS campaign in Israel having its South Africa moment?

Now G4S is being investigated for violating Florida's anti BDS law.

Poor bastards.

What a shame they should be required to follow the law. That's why the typical Islamic polluted backwater is desirable. We could just send in a few islamo-goons carrying AK-47's and resolve this in no time.

 

[P F Tinmore]

• 
  
  
  • Friday 11 March 2016

G4S leaving Israel shows that the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign is winning
The Foreign Office and the Business Department have issued guidance to UK businesses warning them of the reputational risk of operating in illegal settlements


Not only have many student campaigns convinced their universities to drop G4S, butglobally many organisations – public and private – have dropped G4S. At the end of last year Labour’s National Executive Committee decided to end their conference security contract with G4S following a discussion about their complicity with human rights abuses.....
G4S weren’t the first company to be targeted by the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement. The campaign has already had a string of successes.

Veolia, a French corporation, came under the spotlight because of their involvement in the development of a tram system connecting West Jerusalem to Israel’s illegal settlements in occupied East Jerusalem.

Is the BDS campaign in Israel having its South Africa moment?

Now G4S is being investigated for violating Florida's anti BDS law.

Poor bastards.

What a shame they should be required to follow the law. That's why the typical Islamic polluted backwater is desirable. We could just send in a few islamo-goons carrying AK-47's and resolve this in no time.

Do you think BDS cares if G4S gets busted be the state. That is just frosting on the cake.