Another Trump plan dead on arrival : Banks collecting citizenship info isn’t legal.

Conservative from Georgia

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
4,147
Reaction score
3,528
Points
1,938
The White House wants banks to collect citizenship status from customers. But..

Congress regulates banking, not the president. The Bank Secrecy Act doesn’t require citizenship verification and an executive order can’t change that.

And no, banks “voluntarily” complying doesn’t fix it. Courts treat private actors following government pressure as state action. You can’t launder an illegal policy through Chase.
This gets enjoined within days. The only question is which court does it first.

 
The White House wants banks to collect citizenship status from customers. But..

Congress regulates banking, not the president. The Bank Secrecy Act doesn’t require citizenship verification and an executive order can’t change that.

And no, banks “voluntarily” complying doesn’t fix it. Courts treat private actors following government pressure as state action. You can’t launder an illegal policy through Chase.
This gets enjoined within days. The only question is which court does it first.


Banks are backed by the FDIC. The government already has plenty of say as to how they do business. Of course banks don’t like it because they know how many illegals are in the country.
 
The article notes how it is the banks that aren't interested.
Thats understandable

Banks are a business and this new rule will cost them money

And yet they are federally regulated and must follow thousands of rules mandated by the government

Including reporting cash transactions above $10,000
 
The White House wants banks to collect citizenship status from customers. But..

Congress regulates banking, not the president. The Bank Secrecy Act doesn’t require citizenship verification and an executive order can’t change that.

And no, banks “voluntarily” complying doesn’t fix it. Courts treat private actors following government pressure as state action. You can’t launder an illegal policy through Chase.
This gets enjoined within days. The only question is which court does it first.


1772031305970.webp
 
The article notes how it is the banks that aren't interested.
Geee….I wonder why. Walk into a Bank Of America here in Mexifornia at any point throughout any day and you’ll feel like you just warped into a bank in Mexico…Every employee is brown, every person in the bank is brown and no English is spoken. They’re all filthy shitholes
 
The White House wants banks to collect citizenship status from customers. But..

Congress regulates banking, not the president. The Bank Secrecy Act doesn’t require citizenship verification and an executive order can’t change that.

And no, banks “voluntarily” complying doesn’t fix it. Courts treat private actors following government pressure as state action. You can’t launder an illegal policy through Chase.
This gets enjoined within days. The only question is which court does it first.

Why do you lie about being a "Conservative"?
 
So why doesn't congress fix that?
Banks should check citizenship of customers, its a national security issue.

Do we want Russians, or Chinese, or Iranians or drug cartels funding their covert operations here in the US thru banks??

Who could be against that?
 
The White House wants banks to collect citizenship status from customers. But..

Congress regulates banking, not the president. The Bank Secrecy Act doesn’t require citizenship verification and an executive order can’t change that.

And no, banks “voluntarily” complying doesn’t fix it. Courts treat private actors following government pressure as state action. You can’t launder an illegal policy through Chase.
This gets enjoined within days. The only question is which court does it first.

So you want employers to be on the hook for hiring illegals but not the banks housing their money.
 
So why doesn't congress fix that?
Banks should check citizenship of customers, its a national security issue.

Do we want Russians, or Chinese, or Iranians or drug cartels funding their covert operations here in the US thru banks??

Who could be against that?

How does that work? How do you suppose they should check?
 
The easy solution is run E-verify on every new account. If employers have to do it then why not the bank as well.

But employers, no? Employers do not have to do it. At least not a majority.
 
15th post
How does that work? How do you suppose they should check?
 

"Allows" doesn't require.
 
Back
Top Bottom