Another Rat Jumping Ship

I did some research and found this:

1757972395014.webp


So it seem that it appears to you that he did lose.

But trump insists he won, doesn't that say something about his mental acuity?
 
The fact is the 2020 election was stolen. Three court cases and kameltoes loss prove that beyond doubt.

How about you try and keep up.
Tell that to BackAgain a fellow magat, perhaps you can report him for saying trump appears to have lost?

1757972452832.webp
 
You don't know who won the 2020 election, something incredibly basic and you don't know, that's beyond inept.
Yeah, we do. We are also finding out WHO stole it.

Sucks to be you.
 
You don't know who won the 2020 election, something incredibly basic and you don't know, that's beyond inept.
Your claim is that I don’t know.

But that isn’t just your claim. As usual, it isn’t established.

And again, it reveals your plodding intention to post off topic.

Is there some reason you wish to make this about your false claims concerning what I know or don’t know? Is that better in your ignorant little “mind” than actually complying with the rules and posting ON TOPIC?

In THIS case I guess I understand. It’s not much of a thread topic.
 
Ah. Deliberately misconstruing what I did say.
How do you expect the reader to construe:

I don’t know that Trump won. (At present, at least, it appears otherwise.)

as:

1. I know trump won
2. I know trump lost
3. I don't know if trump won or lost
4. I have no ******* idea what I'm talking about

?
 
It’s not an ad hominem. It’s a statement of fact. You always lie when you call anyone to the right of you a “fascist.”

You cannot reasonably even define the term, “fascist.”

And, by the way, you make use of ad hominems all the damn time. So stop with your hypocrisy. You fool nobody.

1757973514003.webp
 
You said you don't know (this is called evidence by the way)

View attachment 1162445

Has your view changed?
Sis you notice the date?

Also, saying that I didn’t know is not the same as saying that Biden didn’t win.

More importantly, I did state the most salient point: there was indeed election chicanery.
 
It’s not an ad hominem. It’s a statement of fact. You always lie when you call anyone to the right of you a “fascist.”

You cannot reasonably even define the term, “fascist.”

And, by the way, you make use of ad hominems all the damn time. So stop with your hypocrisy. You fool nobody.
Jeeez.

I watched most of it thanks. This is right wing populism spreading from the US to Western Europe. It's given every lowlife crank a platform to spout their insanity.

As I was just explaining (well, trying to) to this Jewess, these people are a danger to all of us including Jews, both here and in the USA.
Only a Nazi calls a Jewish woman a Jewess.
 
Only a Nazi calls a Jewish woman a Jewess.

The term's been in use since the 14th century quite a few years before Hitler, the term is regaining popularity too:

In 1980, Rabbi Jacob Rader Marcus, an octogenarian scholar of Jewish history, decided to title his new book about Jewish women in America “The American Jewess.” His publisher, Ktav, told him that was out of the question because the term “Jewess” was, well, offensive. Marcus, more concerned with historical truth than political correctness, didn’t really care. He compromised on the title, calling his study The American Jewish Woman: 1654–1980, but refused to remove the term from his text. “Many Jews today deem it a ‘dirty word’ and avoid it," he writes in the preface. "I believe it is a neutral descriptive noun and I use it constantly. If for some it has become a term of contempt, it is because Judeophobic Gentiles have made it so. I refuse to bow to their prejudice.”

The good Rabbi was not a Nazi so I'll take his word rather than that of a pug in a silly hat.

Buy some books.
 
15th post
If you have time just watch this vid, this guy exposed just who some of these people were on Saturday, they should have been arrested for race hate, if what they said was against Jews they would have been arrested, one of them on Camera even called for the assassination of Starmer, he should be arrested and charged, instead we have people who support Palestine holding a cardboard sign being arrested by the hundreds most of them pensioners.

I listened to the whole video.
The man making the video is couching himself as a moderate Muslim.
He makes some valid points. Some of these speakers.... the ones he highlighted did cross the line.
However, the British people have been put down, beat down, murdered and raped by the invaders.
They are angry and are not going to take it anymore.
Furthermore,
There are no moderate Muslims. They are a religion and government combined in one. They are ruled by Sharia Law and want to institute Sharia in every land that they inhabit. That is their goal. They are patient and they are multiplying.
Meanwhile, they are flooding the European nations while the birthrate of white Christians is declining, theirs is increasing.
They want to take over Europe.
 
The term's been in use since the 14th century quite a few years before Hitler, the term is regaining popularity too:



The good Rabbi was not a Nazi so I'll take his word rather than that of a pug in a silly hat.

Buy some books.
I don't care about history. I am talking about MODERN times.
To call a Jewish woman a Jewess is offensive and is used by Nazis and antisemites.
 
I don't care about history. I am talking about MODERN times.
I don't care what you care about.
To call a Jewish woman a Jewess is offensive and is used by Nazis and antisemites.
and Rabbis, here's the preface from the Rabbis book, read the last paragraph:

1757975165061.webp


Now stop being so woke and resorting to cancel culture over this.
 
Last edited:
I listened to the whole video.
The man making the video is couching himself as a moderate Muslim.
He makes some valid points. Some of these speakers.... the ones he highlighted did cross the line.
However, the British people have been put down, beat down, murdered and raped by the invaders.
They are angry and are not going to take it anymore.
Furthermore,
There are no moderate Muslims. They are a religion and government combined in one. They are ruled by Sharia Law and want to institute Sharia in every land that they inhabit. That is their goal. They are patient and they are multiplying.
Meanwhile, they are flooding the European nations while the birthrate of white Christians is declining, theirs is increasing.
They want to take over Europe.
You are talking nonsense, i am British and just don't recognize any of that, i have worked alongside Muslims over the years most British born and they just want what you and i want, to work for their families etc, only difference is they have a different religion for the most part and don't go down the pub after work for a pint, the extremist Muslims are the Wahabi and Salafist maniacs, you will know them because Western Governments have employed them as a proxy army to attack other Countries like Syria and Clinton employed them in the Balkans to kill Serbs.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom