CDZ Another Question for Gun Owners

[nat4900]

If someone is holding a knife to the throat of a loved one and you have a shotgun how do you plan on hitting one and NOT the other?

Now we must NOT ONLY have right wing nitwits fully armed, we also must have sharshooters' training for all these morons. LOL

 

[boedicca]

Police around the nation have for years begged for assault weapons like those used in Dallas to be taken off the streets. They're overwhelmed.

If you claim to support the police, why not support them by supporting common sense regulation of these weapons and clips, etc?

It's already illegal for people to buy guns in the black market, which is where most criminals get theirs. Law-abiding gun owners aren't a threat to the police, so grabbing their guns and accessories won't improve anything.

 

[nat4900]

MOD EDIT - Someone forgot they were in the FZ .....

 

[boedicca]

It's already illegal for people to buy guns in the black market, which is where most criminals get theirs

Well, hopefully criminals will send your ilk a "thank you" card for making their purchase of a deadly, military-style weapon
so fucking easy and LEGAL...

If they are criminals, then they should fail the background check process, bub...and not be able to legally purchase a gun.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Thinking that a ban on assault weapons would somehow get them out of the hands of criminals, who by definition don't follow the law, is not common sense, it's lack thereof. The government in question would only be weakening the ability of citizens to defend themselves, while criminals would continue being able to use them. We've already had MANY stupid threads like this.

In other words, police departments are filled with "stupid" people who request something (a ban on such weapons), BUT the right wing morons who supposedly "support" the police are basically raising their collective middle finger to the police departments' request.......

Go figure !!!

Every medium is filled with stupid people. Assuming people know what they're talking about because of their occupation is just ignorant. Besides, you failed to address any part of my post, and that's obviously because you have no way to argue that criminals follow the law...

 

[DarkFury]

MOD EDIT - Someone forgot they were in the FZ .....

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Other laws don't hinder the ability of citizens to defend themselves.

here is a right wing moron who must "defend" herself on a fucking daily basis....right nitwit?

So, are you now trying to argue that nobody has to defend themselves ever? Are you implying that people shouldn't be prepared to defend themselves?

 

[yiostheoy]

Police around the nation have for years begged for assault weapons like those used in Dallas to be taken off the streets. They're overwhelmed.

If you claim to support the police, why not support them by supporting common sense regulation of these weapons and clips, etc?

Assault weapons are a genie that is out of the bottle.

You need assault weapons to protect yourself FROM assault weapons.

That's the answer to your question.

However the recent SCOTUS decision NOT to hear an anti assault weapons ban shows that the SCOTUS does not particularly care about assault weapons one way or the other.

So the states and cities are free to ban them if they wish.

However that does not change the reality of the genie being out of the bottle.

 

[yiostheoy]

If someone is holding a knife to the throat of a loved one and you have a shotgun how do you plan on hitting one and NOT the other?

Now we must NOT ONLY have right wing nitwits fully armed, we also must have sharshooters' training for all these morons. LOL

No stupid, the proper weapon for the need. You can't sharp shoot a shotgun. Excluding slugs.

Slugs are not that accurate either.

The best hostage shot is made with an assault weapon, preferably one with some kind of scope on it.

 

[nat4900]

If they are criminals, then they should fail the background check process, bub...and not be able to legally purchase a gun.

Well, thanks for stating the obvious........Criminals are labeled criminals the day AFTER they commit a crime....The day before the criminal act, the individual is just another citizen exercising his or her right to LEGALLY purchase a military style deadly weapon......thanks to you and your ilk (and, of course, the NRA)

 

[DarkFury]

MOD EDIT - Someone forgot they were in the FZ .....

 

[nat4900]

MOD EDIT - Someone forgot they were in the FZ .....

 

[nat4900]

MOD EDIT - Someone forgot they were in the FZ .....

 

[nat4900]

MOD EDIT - Someone forgot they were in the FZ .....

 

[nat4900]

MOD EDIT - Someone forgot they were in the FZ .....

 

[DarkFury]

Every medium is filled with stupid people. Assuming people know what they're talking about because of their occupation is just ignorant. Besides, you failed to address any part of my post, and that's obviously because you have no way to argue that criminals follow the law...

Here is a simple scenario for morons like you.....Would a would be criminal prefer,

a. To purchase his military style weapon on the black market risking that the weapon is sold by an undercover ATF agent...OR
b. To purchase that same weapon LEGALLY by just walking to a local gun show venue?

It takes an F3 and a ton of paperwork to get a military style weapon.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

So, are you now trying to argue that nobody has to defend themselves ever?

You arrived at THAT conclusion from sitting on a toilet bowl and grimacing a bit.

How often have YOU had to defend yourself with a military-style type of weapon? Come on, be just a tiny bit honest.

I came to that conclusion because you're advocating a ban on Assault Rifles, meaning criminals can use them and law-abiding citizens can't. You're essentially weakening citizens so they're easier targets for criminals.

People defend themselves a lot more often than you seem to think.

 

[nat4900]

However the recent SCOTUS decision NOT to hear an anti assault weapons ban shows that the SCOTUS does not particularly care about assault weapons one way or the other.

So the states and cities are free to ban them if they wish.

As sane as that may sound, its a foolish errand.........You can ban all the gun purchases you may want in D.C. but a would be criminal from that city, just has to take a Metro ride to Virginia and buy all the guns he or she wants.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Every medium is filled with stupid people. Assuming people know what they're talking about because of their occupation is just ignorant. Besides, you failed to address any part of my post, and that's obviously because you have no way to argue that criminals follow the law...

Here is a simple scenario for morons like you.....Would a would be criminal prefer,

a. To purchase his military style weapon on the black market risking that the weapon is sold by an undercover ATF agent...OR
b. To purchase that same weapon LEGALLY by just walking to a local gun show venue?

You're far more likely to meet other criminals, especially on the Deep Web. Your scenario is invalid. Besides, this administration showed us that they're more than happy to provide criminals with weapons, no strings attached.

 

[nat4900]

So, are you now trying to argue that nobody has to defend themselves ever?

You arrived at THAT conclusion from sitting on a toilet bowl and grimacing a bit.

How often have YOU had to defend yourself with a military-style type of weapon? Come on, be just a tiny bit honest.

I came to that conclusion because you're advocating a ban on Assault Rifles, meaning criminals can use them and law-abiding citizens can't. You're essentially weakening citizens so they're easier targets for criminals.

People defend themselves a lot more often than you seem to think.

So, you're expecting a criminal (or the dreaded Federal black-booted thugs) to use assault weapons to invade your house....and you're ready to fight them off with YOUR assault rifle.....is THAT the scenario your xxxxxxxx envisioning?