Another one not to be forgotten. . . .

[teddyearp]

The 1834 looting in Safed (and apparently other cities) against the Jews living there.

1834 looting of Safed - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One account, retold by several Safed Jews to the 25-year-old Alexander William Kinglake, who visited in 1835,[22] blamed the incident on the intolerant rantings of a local Muslim cleric named Muhammad Damoor. The account stated that at the beginning of 1834, Damoor publicly prophesied that on June 15 the "true believers would rise up in just wrath against the Jews, and despoil them of their gold and their silver and their jewels."[23]

The account of Neophytos, a monk of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre described the looting of the town, alongside similar events in Ramla, Lydda, Jaffa, Acre and Tiberias, noting that the perpetrators "robbed the Jews, who lived in these towns, of immense property, as is reported, for there was no one to offer any opposition".[24]

The 1850 account of Rabbi Joseph Schwartz stated that "Everything was carried off which could possibly be removed, even articles of no value; boxes, chests, packages, without even opening them, were dragged away; and the fury with which this crowd attacked their defenceless victims was boundless... [The perpetrators] were perfectly safe and unmolested; for they had learned that Abraim Pacha was, at the moment, so much occupied at Jerusalem and vicinity with his enemies there, that he could not go into Galilee."[6]

One anecdote suggests the rioting was premeditated, organised by a local anti-Semitic Muslim cleric,[23] According to the anecdotes narrated to Kinglake, when June 15 arrived, Muhammad Damoor appeared to the gathered Muslim crowd and incited them to fulfill his prophesy. Kinglake only mentions the occurrence of looting, writing that "the most odious of all outrages, that of searching the women for the base purpose of discovering such things as gold and silver concealed about their persons, was perpetrated without shame."[23]

So, when did the Zionist movement start? About a half century or so later. It certainly cannot be to blame for this or these events. Heck, the Jews hadn't really started to return to Israel en mass yet. Also shows that there were Jewish communities in Israel well before Zionism. Hell, they have had pockets there for three thousand years.

And Muhammad Damoor reminds us of who? Reminds me of the grand Mufti who came along almost 100 years later.

 

[MJB12741]

The 1834 looting in Safed (and apparently other cities) against the Jews living there.

One account, retold by several Safed Jews to the 25-year-old Alexander William Kinglake, who visited in 1835,[22] blamed the incident on the intolerant rantings of a local Muslim cleric named Muhammad Damoor. The account stated that at the beginning of 1834, Damoor publicly prophesied that on June 15 the "true believers would rise up in just wrath against the Jews, and despoil them of their gold and their silver and their jewels."[23]

The account of Neophytos, a monk of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre described the looting of the town, alongside similar events in Ramla, Lydda, Jaffa, Acre and Tiberias, noting that the perpetrators "robbed the Jews, who lived in these towns, of immense property, as is reported, for there was no one to offer any opposition".[24]

The 1850 account of Rabbi Joseph Schwartz stated that "Everything was carried off which could possibly be removed, even articles of no value; boxes, chests, packages, without even opening them, were dragged away; and the fury with which this crowd attacked their defenceless victims was boundless... [The perpetrators] were perfectly safe and unmolested; for they had learned that Abraim Pacha was, at the moment, so much occupied at Jerusalem and vicinity with his enemies there, that he could not go into Galilee."[6]

One anecdote suggests the rioting was premeditated, organised by a local anti-Semitic Muslim cleric,[23] According to the anecdotes narrated to Kinglake, when June 15 arrived, Muhammad Damoor appeared to the gathered Muslim crowd and incited them to fulfill his prophesy. Kinglake only mentions the occurrence of looting, writing that "the most odious of all outrages, that of searching the women for the base purpose of discovering such things as gold and silver concealed about their persons, was perpetrated without shame."[23]

So, when did the Zionist movement start? About a half century or so later. It certainly cannot be to blame for this or these events. Heck, the Jews hadn't really started to return to Israel en mass yet. Also shows that there were Jewish communities in Israel well before Zionism. Hell, they have had pockets there for three thousand years.

And Muhammad Damoor reminds us of who? Reminds me of the grand Mufti who came along almost 100 years later.

Very cleaver them Zionists to cause this in 1850.

 

[MJB12741]

Amazing! And those ZIONISTS caused the Hebron massacre as well in 1929 before there were any ZIONISTS.

 

[fanger]

Rabbi Joseph Schwartz noted the justice that once calm had been restored, Ibrahim Pasha's army arrested and executed a number of perpetrators, and enforced summary justice on many suspects to ensure stolen goods were returned:

"The most respectable Mahomedans of Zafed and its environs were arrested as the authors of the outrage, and some of them were afterwards publicly executed, and whatever could be found of the stolen property of the Jews was restored. Every Jew was believed, when saying that he recognised this or that Arab among the robbers. The person so accused was instantly arrested, and punished with blows till he at last confessed and gave up his booty. Even many of the richest and most respectable of the Arabs were arrested, loaded with chains, and punished, upon the mere assertion of a very poor and common Jew. The word of a Jew was regarded as equal to the command of the highest authority, and severe punishment was at once resorted to, without any previous investigation, without any grounds or proofs. In this manner much of the stolen property was discovered; since many, in order not to be exposed to the violence of the Druses, delivered up everything of their own accord. The Jews were now required, by order of the Pacha, through the intervention of the consuls, to make out a correct list of all they had lost, of whatever they missed, and to indicate the true value of the same, and to hand it in to Abraim Pacha through means of the European consuls."

 

[Hollie]

Rabbi Joseph Schwartz noted the justice that once calm had been restored, Ibrahim Pasha's army arrested and executed a number of perpetrators, and enforced summary justice on many suspects to ensure stolen goods were returned:

"The most respectable Mahomedans of Zafed and its environs were arrested as the authors of the outrage, and some of them were afterwards publicly executed, and whatever could be found of the stolen property of the Jews was restored. Every Jew was believed, when saying that he recognised this or that Arab among the robbers. The person so accused was instantly arrested, and punished with blows till he at last confessed and gave up his booty. Even many of the richest and most respectable of the Arabs were arrested, loaded with chains, and punished, upon the mere assertion of a very poor and common Jew. The word of a Jew was regarded as equal to the command of the highest authority, and severe punishment was at once resorted to, without any previous investigation, without any grounds or proofs. In this manner much of the stolen property was discovered; since many, in order not to be exposed to the violence of the Druses, delivered up everything of their own accord. The Jews were now required, by order of the Pacha, through the intervention of the consuls, to make out a correct list of all they had lost, of whatever they missed, and to indicate the true value of the same, and to hand it in to Abraim Pacha through means of the European consuls."

The expectation is that you're simply cutting and pasting irrelevant material from wiki. However, it is in good form to identify the source of your cutting and pasting.

 

[Phoenall]

Rabbi Joseph Schwartz noted the justice that once calm had been restored, Ibrahim Pasha's army arrested and executed a number of perpetrators, and enforced summary justice on many suspects to ensure stolen goods were returned:

"The most respectable Mahomedans of Zafed and its environs were arrested as the authors of the outrage, and some of them were afterwards publicly executed, and whatever could be found of the stolen property of the Jews was restored. Every Jew was believed, when saying that he recognised this or that Arab among the robbers. The person so accused was instantly arrested, and punished with blows till he at last confessed and gave up his booty. Even many of the richest and most respectable of the Arabs were arrested, loaded with chains, and punished, upon the mere assertion of a very poor and common Jew. The word of a Jew was regarded as equal to the command of the highest authority, and severe punishment was at once resorted to, without any previous investigation, without any grounds or proofs. In this manner much of the stolen property was discovered; since many, in order not to be exposed to the violence of the Druses, delivered up everything of their own accord. The Jews were now required, by order of the Pacha, through the intervention of the consuls, to make out a correct list of all they had lost, of whatever they missed, and to indicate the true value of the same, and to hand it in to Abraim Pacha through means of the European consuls."

So once again you whinge about islamonazi's getting treated as the mass murdering war criminals they are, and consider the treatment dished out to be unfair and unwarranted.

Did you like the part where it said " Even many of the richest and most respectable of the Arabs were arrested, loaded with chains, and punished, upon the mere assertion of a very poor and common Jew. The word of a Jew was regarded as equal to the command of the highest authority, and severe punishment was at once resorted to, without any previous investigation, without any grounds or proofs. In this manner much of the stolen property was discovered; since many, in order not to be exposed to the violence of the Druses "



This means that then as now the word of a mohamedan or muslim was worth less than nothing

 

[Phoenall]

Rabbi Joseph Schwartz noted the justice that once calm had been restored, Ibrahim Pasha's army arrested and executed a number of perpetrators, and enforced summary justice on many suspects to ensure stolen goods were returned:

"The most respectable Mahomedans of Zafed and its environs were arrested as the authors of the outrage, and some of them were afterwards publicly executed, and whatever could be found of the stolen property of the Jews was restored. Every Jew was believed, when saying that he recognised this or that Arab among the robbers. The person so accused was instantly arrested, and punished with blows till he at last confessed and gave up his booty. Even many of the richest and most respectable of the Arabs were arrested, loaded with chains, and punished, upon the mere assertion of a very poor and common Jew. The word of a Jew was regarded as equal to the command of the highest authority, and severe punishment was at once resorted to, without any previous investigation, without any grounds or proofs. In this manner much of the stolen property was discovered; since many, in order not to be exposed to the violence of the Druses, delivered up everything of their own accord. The Jews were now required, by order of the Pacha, through the intervention of the consuls, to make out a correct list of all they had lost, of whatever they missed, and to indicate the true value of the same, and to hand it in to Abraim Pacha through means of the European consuls."

The expectation is that you're simply cutting and pasting irrelevant material from wiki. However, it is in good form to identify the source of your cutting and pasting.

That is all he has as he cant think for himself being a worthless mohamedan

 

[fanger]

The expectation is that you're simply cutting and pasting irrelevant material from wiki. However, it is in good form to identify the source of your cutting and pasting.

Wake up, It came from the same Link given in the OP by Teddyearp, did you have any comment (silly or normal) on the thread?

 

[Phoenall]

The expectation is that you're simply cutting and pasting irrelevant material from wiki. However, it is in good form to identify the source of your cutting and pasting.

Wake up, It came from the same Link given in the OP by Teddyearp, did you have any comment (silly or normal) on the thread?

Do you as all you did was copy and paste..........................

 

[fanger]

Same as the OP

 

[Hollie]

The expectation is that you're simply cutting and pasting irrelevant material from wiki. However, it is in good form to identify the source of your cutting and pasting.

Wake up, It came from the same Link given in the OP by Teddyearp, did you have any comment (silly or normal) on the thread?

Wake up. It's in good form to identify the source for your cutting and pasting. We know from experience that you plagiarize.

 

[fanger]

The expectation is that you're simply cutting and pasting irrelevant material from wiki. However, it is in good form to identify the source of your cutting and pasting.

Wake up, It came from the same Link given in the OP by Teddyearp, did you have any comment (silly or normal) on the thread?

Wake up. It's in good form to identify the source for your cutting and pasting. We know from experience that you plagiarize.

I may call for a Plagiarize or even a pox on the tribe of israel, but my Link was the same as Teddyboys, dont see the link, report the OP for not following USMB guidelines on starting new threads to admin, or shut your cake hole

 

[teddyearp]

Same as the OP

Read much? I did post my own material and opinion in the OP. And I agree that a link to your material is customary.

 

[fanger]

Your post was changed by an un-named moderator to include the link you left out "Last edited by a moderator: Yesterday at 1:35 PM"

 

[teddyearp]

Your post was changed by an un-named moderator to include the link you left out "Last edited by a moderator: Yesterday at 1:35 PM"

I didn't say when, lol. But yeah, you got me, I messed up and asked for the link to be added after my time to edit my post was over.

Me bad.

 

[Phoenall]

Your post was changed by an un-named moderator to include the link you left out "Last edited by a moderator: Yesterday at 1:35 PM"

Where does it say that this is what the moderator did then, or are you jumping to conclusions because you have been shown to be a complete moron

 

[Phoenall]

Your post was changed by an un-named moderator to include the link you left out "Last edited by a moderator: Yesterday at 1:35 PM"

I didn't say when, lol. But yeah, you got me, I messed up and asked for the link to be added after my time to edit my post was over.

Me bad.

Yet I found the link on the original post just by looking for the red highlights

 

[fanger]

a complete moron would not see the Mod edit on the first post, bottom right "Last edited by a moderator: Yesterday at 1:35 PM"

 

[teddyearp]

a complete moron would not see the Mod edit on the first post, bottom right "Last edited by a moderator: Yesterday at 1:35 PM"

I clearly underestimated you, fanger. I was hoping to sneak it in, but no getting one over on you, lol. This time, hehe.

 

[Phoenall]

a complete moron would not see the Mod edit on the first post, bottom right "Last edited by a moderator: Yesterday at 1:35 PM"

While a bigger moron would not see the highlighted words in red already in the post that shows a web link. Did you miss those red words ?