Another lie from Bill O'Reilly!?

[JimH52]

O Reilly Lied About Suicide Of JFK Assassination Figure Former Colleagues Say Blog Media Matters for America

Maybe he was the guy on the grassy knoll?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Soros's group said O'Reilly lied, so it must be true

 

[Stephanie]

what a waste of time

shun anything off mediamatters

there only purpose is -dirt, smears and slime

 

[Stephanie]

I wonder why MM didn't cover this?

SNIP:
Obama Espoused Radical [Communist] Views in College Steve Malzberg - WOR News Talk Radio 710 ^ | February 12, 2010 | Ronald Kessler

Dr. John C. Drew, a grant writing consultant in Laguna Niguel, Calif., tells Newsmax he met Obama in 1980 when Obama was a sophomore at Occidental College in Los Angeles. Drew had just graduated from Occidental and was attending graduate school at Cornell University.
During Christmas break, Drew says he was at Grauman-Boss’ home in Palo Alto when Obama came over with Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, his roommate from Pakistan.
“Barack [Obama] and Hasan showed up at the house in a BMW, and then we went to a restaurant together,” Drew says. “We had a nice meal, and then we came back to the house and smoked cigarettes and drank and argued politics.”
For the next several hours, they discussed Marxism.
“He [Obama] was arguing a straightforward Marxist-Leninist class-struggle point of view, which anticipated that there would be a revolution of the working class, led by revolutionaries, who would overthrow the capitalist system and institute a new socialist government that would redistribute the wealth,” says Drew, who says he himself was then a Marxist.
“The idea was basically that wealthy people were exploiting others,” Drew says. “That this was the secret of their wealth, that they weren’t paying others enough for their work, and they were using and taking advantage of other people. He was convinced that a revolution would take place, and it would be a good thing.”
Drew concluded that Obama thought of himself as “part of an intelligent, radical vanguard that was leading the way towards this revolution and towards this new society.” ..."
Referring to Obama’s quote from “Dreams of My Father” that he associated with Marxist professors, Drew says, “What he’s not saying is that he was in 100 percent total agreement with those Marxist professors. When you understand that, Obama’s later associations and policies make more sense, including why he was taken in by Rev. Wright’s ideology.”
all of it here:
Why Is Observing Obama As A Marxist Verboten

or this:

"This president can be a transformative leader (he has that potential in my view), but only if he embraces and fights for a transformative agenda."--Sam Webb, Chairman Communist Party USA
Obama State of the Union: He got the ball rolling:
http://cpusa.org/obama-state-of-the-union-he-got-the-ball-rolling


Where the fxxk IS MEDIAMATTERS NOW ????
or any of the lamestream media not covering this and hiding it from us???

wake up people

 

[tinydancer]

Amazing how many left wing lunatics are obsessed with lies when it concerns a conservative.

Crickets whenever one of their assholes is caught lying their asses off. Apparently the new VA Secretary lied about being in Special Forces. I've not seen a thing about it on the board yet.

 

[Stephanie]

All of the above I posted was because I was reading this article:
You people put a commie/Marxist in as President

SNIP:
Why Is Observing Obama as a Marxist Verboten?
By Bill Flax
The recent release of a tape by Andrew Breitbart's outfit sparked renewed interest in President Obama's murky past. In anticipation, conservatives were elated that the president might finally be exposed. The tape showed Obama, then at Harvard Law, orchestrating a protest on behalf of Derrick Bell.


Without providing any background on just how radical is Professor Bell, the compliant liberal media derisively dismissed it all as conservative paranoia, even proclaiming presidential vindication. It still appears preposterous to purport that America elected a communist ideologue. The world's greatest beneficiary of capitalist bounty would never willingly empower a radical socialist to "fundamentally transform America."



Unfortunately, we did, even if Americans loathe admitting it. And this ought to have been obvious even before Mr. Breitbart's valiant efforts.


Obama exploits the citizenry's concerted blindness, cloaking his views under veneers of "social justice," "fairness," and "progress." Unadulterated Marxism attracts few votes. In rare candor, sans teleprompter, Obama lectured Joe the Plumber that his prescription for widespread prosperity is "spreading the wealth around."

Before catapulting to prominence, the president complained that thanks to constraints instituted by our Founders,"The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice." Obama's justice ensures not that transactions are freely entered and fairly measured, but that bureaucrats enforce results fancied per the fluttering fashions of political correctness.

Still, most Americans would deny Obama's Marxist outlook, mistaking the term's meaning as synonymous with Stalin or Mao. Marxist theory informed many of history's most murderous tyrants, but Obama's brand is the emasculated theorizing of the faculty lounge. He neither intends similar mayhem nor has such means in our constitutional republic.

ALL of it here:
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/03/why_is_observing_obama_as_a_marxist_verboten.html#ixzz3SiIiFkdy
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

 

[Kondor3]

Do you really think that the vast majority of Americans give a frog's fat ass about these Copy-Cat assaults on O'Reilly?

 

[Stephanie]

Do you really think that the vast majority of Americans give a frog's fat ass about these Copy-Cat assaults on O'Reilly?

Some people don't mind being tools. after all it's FOR THE PARTY

Mediamatters post the smears and their tools spreads it