I'll stick with scientists over some weatherman
I'll stick with scientists over some weatherman
quote:
Whereas weather refers to short-term changes in the atmosphere, climate describes what the weather is like over a long period of time in a specific area. Different regions can have different climates.
What’s the Difference Between Weather and Climate?
Though climate and weather are closely related, they aren't the same thing. The main difference between the two is time.www.ncei.noaa.gov
Science.Climate is what we expect ... weather is what we actually get ...
You don't think Meteorology or Atmospheric Science are actual sciences? ... how strange ... is that because they are mathematically driven, and you don't understand math? ...
Please ... point to where climate is changing:
Köppen climate classification - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Latitude and longitude if you know ...
climate.nasa.gov
Yes, the science of an interglacial period.Science.
Climate Change - NASA Science
NASA is a global leader in studying Earth’s changing climate.
The Right and especially MAGA-world detests fact checking and science.Yes, the science of an interglacial period.
More like empirical climate evidence of the geologic record.
Did you just make this up, or has nutbag posted this where you can link to it?
Science.
Climate Change - NASA Science
NASA is a global leader in studying Earth’s changing climate.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....
trying to impress somebody with what you find online?
His science is limited to what he reads from MSNBC.
/-----/ Further proof that climate change is a natural process. REMEMBER Trust the Science.I have been critical of computer models being used to predict the effects of human on the climate. The main reason is that they are always wrong and are nothing more than shit in shout models that are paid for by the Environmental Wacko lobby. Mostly in the universities but also with the government agencies like NASA and NOAA.
These are models that the Environmental Wackos refer to when they tell us we are all going to be dead in seven, or ten or 20 years because of man made warming.
The Climate Change scam research mostly is nothing more than grifting for government grants and a power-grab tool for government itself.
It looks like we have now discovered a main reason the models are always wrong. 40 years of observed data trumps some grad student's computer program, doesn't it?
New Study: Climate Models Get Water Vapor Wildly Wrong – A ‘Major Gap in Our Understanding’
From the NoTricksZone By Kenneth Richard on 19. February 2024 “Here, we have demonstrated a major discrepancy between observation-based and climate model-based historical trends in n…wattsupwiththat.com
New Study: Climate Models Get Water Vapor Wildly Wrong – A ‘Major Gap in Our Understanding’
By Kenneth Richard on 19. February 2024
“Here, we have demonstrated a major discrepancy between observation-based and climate model-based historical trends in near-surface atmospheric water vapor in arid and semi-ari regions.” – Simpson et al.,
A new study published in PNAS has demonstrated, once again, that climate models fail to simulate what happens in the real world with regard to fundamental climate change variables like water vapor. This is a devastating finding, as water vapor is the most significant greenhouse gas due to its alleged “feedback” capacity, accelerating warming well beyond what CO2 is said to be capable of alone.
The authors do not understate the significance of this climate modeling failure.
“This represents a major gap in our understanding and in climate model fidelity that must be understood and fixed as soon as possible in order to provide reliable hydroclimate projections for arid/semi-arid regions in the coming decades.”
Per state-of-the-art climate models, specific humidity (SH) should increase as a consequence of CO2-induced global warming. But 40 years of observations (1980-) show no increasing SH trend over arid/semi-arid regions.
Per state-of-the-art climate models, relative humidity (RH) should decline slightly as a consequence of CO2-induced global warming. But 40 years of observations (1980-) show not a slight declining trend, but a declining trend that is “about an order of magnitude more than the models on average.” In other words, the climate models are wrong by a factor of 10
The models say the tropical warming rate should have been nearly 3 times larger than the observations show – “0.389 ± 0.173°C per decade (models) and 0.142 ± 0.115°C per decade (observed)” – due to the assumed feedback response to CO2 forcing over warm regions. Instead, there is a “clear and significant tendency on the part of the models to overstate warming.”
/-----/ Further proof that climate change is a natural process. REMBER Trust the Science.
New research has identified oceanic transform faults as significant, previously underestimated sinks for CO2, challenging existing notions about the Earth’s geological carbon cycle. This research emphasizes the crucial role of natural geological emissions in shaping Earth’s climate history and highlights the need for a deeper understanding of these processes in the context of addressing contemporary climate change. Above is a cut slice of altered mantle rock. Credit: Solvin ZanklAccidental Deep Ocean Discovery Changes Our Understanding of Earth
Studying a rock is like reading a book. The rock has a story to tell, says Frieder Klein, an associate scientist in the Marine Chemistry & Geochemistry Department at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). The rocks that Klein and his colleagues analyzed from the submerged flanks ofscitechdaily.com
As the paper states, “global anthropogenic CO2 emissions are estimated to be on the order of 36 gigatons (Gt) per year, dwarfing estimates of average geological emissions (0.26 Gt per year) to the atmosphere and hydrosphere. Yet, over geological timescales, emissions of CO2 sourced from Earth’s mantle have been pivotal in regulating Earth’s climate and habitability, as well as the C [carbon]-concentration in surface reservoirs, including the oceans, atmosphere, and lithosphere.” Klein adds that “this is before anthropogenic combustion of fossil fuels, of course.”
CO2 is a good thing.
That’s a lie. You deniers make up shit because Fox and Friends your only source along with the other science illiterates, are the only thing your TV us tuned to.
I'm in the UK, I don't have or use Fox here, I use science journals.
Another science illiterate trying to precedent that AGW is only about the weather. The only thing there is no credible proof of, is you know what you’re talking about.
