Another eots Wet Dream

[eots]

frontline: the man who knew | PBSFBI Special Agent John O'Neill was the FBI's leading expert on Al Qaeda. But to people at FBI headquarters he was too much of a maverick and they stopped ...
www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/knew/ - 16k

Evidence that the US Government had Prior Knowledge of the ...David Shipper, who led the impeachment case against President Clinton, is now representing several FBI agents who state that they knew about the attacks ...
socialismmarxdeleonforarealunion.org/New_Report_on_September_11_.html - 26k -

YouTube - The Senator Wellstone Assassination
While many citizens believe that Senator Paul Wellstone's ...
59 min -
[ame]www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vbf49kzWFw[/ame]

 

[eots]

you take a section from another post the re-title and post it in my name
what kind of a loser are you anyway...it shows how weak minded both you and your argument are...imagine what someone like you would be capable of if given any real power or moral responsibility

 

[Annie]

you take a section from another post the re-title and post it in my name
what kind of a loser are you anyway...it shows how weak minded both you and your argument are...imagine what someone like you would be capable of if given any real power or moral responsibility

WTF? That wasn't you that posted this?

 

[eots]

WTF? That wasn't you that posted this?

I posted the youtude clips on another thread the rest was created by someone at usmb

 

[Annie]

I posted the youtude clips on another thread the rest was created by someone at usmb

I'd complain to Scooter then, unless he did it, which is unlikely.

 

[eots]

To me this is what someone who has lost a debate and felt defeated would do . a desperate attempt to hide from what is to difficult to accept

 

[Annie]

To me this is what someone who has lost a debate and felt defeated would do . a desperate attempt to hide from what is to difficult to accept

Actually it could be the inappropriate response on anyone that would be sick of your nonsense, which of course leaves the field open to those with common sense and moderating abilities.

 

[eots]

Actually it could be the inappropriate response on anyone that would be sick of your nonsense, which of course leaves the field open to those with common sense and moderating abilities.

I will forgive you for you ignorance of the facts ,I know its difficult for some to come to terms with

 

[Gunny]

you take a section from another post the re-title and post it in my name
what kind of a loser are you anyway...it shows how weak minded both you and your argument are...imagine what someone like you would be capable of if given any real power or moral responsibility

What part of you have your own subforum to post your conspiratorial crap don't you get?

I took no "section" from another thread ... I cut YOUR irrelvant post out and put it here.

You get the same deal as the other knucklehead on this board. Post your garbage in the appropriate forum. Every time you attempt to derail a thread with this conspiratorial crap, you get an infraction from this point forward.

Next time you have a question about a USMB staff member's decision, please abide by the rules and PM a staff member concerning that decision.

Thanks.

 

[Annie]

What part of you have your own subforum to post your conspiratorial crap don't you get?

I took no "section" from another thread ... I cut YOUR irrelvant post out and put it here.

You get the same deal as the other knucklehead on this board. Post your garbage in the appropriate forum. Every time you attempt to derail a thread with this conspiratorial crap, you get an infraction from this point forward.

Next time you have a question about a USMB staff member's decision, please abide by the rules and PM a staff member concerning that decision.

Thanks.

That makes so much sense! I should have noticed the forum.

 

[eots]

That makes so much sense! I should have noticed the forum.

and changed the title you piece of shit

 

[Gunny]

and changed the title you piece of shit

Let me explain something to you in first grade English ... you have a problem with ANYTHING a staff member does, feel free to address it via PM.

I have not once touched a single post of yours that actually addressed an issue rather than deflect to some paranoid conspiracy bullshit. You are NOT going to derail threads with your bullshit, nor are you going to spam this board with it.

Questions?

 

[Paulie]

I have not once touched a single post of yours that actually addressed an issue rather than deflect to some paranoid conspiracy bullshit. You are NOT going to derail threads with your bullshit, nor are you going to spam this board with it.

Did you not in a sense derail the Ron Paul fundraising event thread, by alluding to some type of conspiracy from the moneyman of the Democratic Party to fund Ron Paul, a republican? Double standard Gunny, whether it's about 9/11, skull and bones, or political campaigns.

The fact that you feel a need to divert different thoughts by people to their own little "kook" area, says a lot about your views on freedom of expression. What do you care what someone believes?

People discuss theories about the Bush admin deliberately falsifying documents, and tricking Congress and the American public to authorize and support a full scale invasion of Iraq. That's ALSO a conspiracy theory, and could easily be viewed as "paranoid delusions" by somone who advocates the current status-quo...but you don't go shoving them into their own special forum.

The fact is, people on this board express a certain conspiracy theory of their own everyday. Politics as a whole are chock FULL of them. All you have really done is take certain one's you don't agree with, and bury them, while leaving others that you enjoy debating, out in the mainstream forums.

There's really no rational, justifiable explanation for it.

 

[Annie]

Did you not in a sense derail the Ron Paul fundraising event thread, by alluding to some type of conspiracy from the moneyman of the Democratic Party to fund Ron Paul, a republican? Double standard Gunny, whether it's about 9/11, skull and bones, or political campaigns.

The fact that you feel a need to divert different thoughts by people to their own little "kook" area, says a lot about your views on freedom of expression. What do you care what someone believes?

People discuss theories about the Bush admin deliberately falsifying documents, and tricking Congress and the American public to authorize and support a full scale invasion of Iraq. That's ALSO a conspiracy theory, and could easily be viewed as "paranoid delusions" by somone who advocates the current status-quo...but you don't go shoving them into their own special forum.

The fact is, people on this board express a certain conspiracy theory of their own everyday. Politics as a whole are chock FULL of them. All you have really done is take certain one's you don't agree with, and bury them, while leaving others that you enjoy debating, out in the mainstream forums.

There's really no rational, justifiable explanation for it.

He didn't move it into a 'Ron Paul Conspiracies' forum, he expressed his own opinion on something and why. I believe that is part of discourse. Your attempt to bully others into not saying anything negative about RP is certainly an attempt at shutting down speech.

I note he did nothing with this thread which of course was just a diversion to get others to Ron Paul site. This tactic is used over and over by RP fans, which is annoying, but probably necessary for them. I agree with what Gunny has been doing with Eots off posts. I've had her on ignore for a long time, but since she posts her rubbish all over, keep coming across them in quotes from others. In the particular case, I didn't look at the forum.

 

[Paulie]

He didn't move it into a 'Ron Paul Conspiracies' forum, he expressed his own opinion on something and why. I believe that is part of discourse. Your attempt to bully others into not saying anything negative about RP is certainly an attempt at shutting down speech.

Ok, you botched that one Kath. Gunny accused someone of derailing a thread by stating their belief, or more specifically their theory, within it. I merely turned the table on him by pointing out the irony in that, based on him doing the same exact thing. I never said that Gunny moved my thread. You say he expressed his opinion on something, and I say yeah, well so does everyone else here. I also have never bullied anyone into negatively talking about RP. I don't know where you come up with this shit about me all the time, but you're never right. I have ONE THREAD where I've asked for it to not be about bashing RP, and instead talking about the economic policy concerns he discusses in the videos. There are millions more people who agree with his policy, so why bother bashing the messenger in that case. In any other thread, feel free to say whatever the hell you want about him. I would never censor discussion.

I note he did nothing with this thread which of course was just a diversion to get others to Ron Paul site.

I can only assume that since the thread topic is about supporting Tancredo, but you are saying it's a diversion to get others to Ron Paul's site, that you are implying that someone deliberately started a Tancredo thread in order to get it to turn into a Ron Paul advertisement. That sounds like paranoid delusion to me. The only 2 people who mentioned Ron Paul positively in the thread were myself, and BaronVonBigmeat, so you must be accusing either one of us.

I find the suspicion to be patently ridiculous in the first place, especially if you weren't really implying that myself or Baron were involved, because how could anyone really know where the discussion is going to lead? It's the 'Politics" forum, there are threads created about candidates all the time.

That's a conspiracy theory Kathianne, no matter how you slice it.

This tactic is used over and over by RP fans, which is annoying, but probably necessary for them.

Do you have any evidence of such nonsense?

I mean seriously Kathianne, why do you bother participating on a political message board if it's causing you this kind of heartache?

 

[Annie]

Ok, you botched that one Kath. Gunny accused someone of derailing a thread by stating their belief, or more specifically their theory, within it. I merely turned the table on him by pointing out the irony in that, based on him doing the same exact thing. I never said that Gunny moved my thread. You say he expressed his opinion on something, and I say yeah, well so does everyone else here. I also have never bullied anyone into negatively talking about RP. I don't know where you come up with this shit about me all the time, but you're never right. I have ONE THREAD where I've asked for it to not be about bashing RP, and instead talking about the economic policy concerns he discusses in the videos. There are millions more people who agree with his policy, so why bother bashing the messenger in that case. In any other thread, feel free to say whatever the hell you want about him. I would never censor discussion.

So the management agreed to that? We should all get to have our own forums, with our own parameters. We all pay the same, except Scotter.

I can only assume that since the thread topic is about supporting Tancredo, but you are saying it's a diversion to get others to Ron Paul's site, that you are implying that someone deliberately started a Tancredo thread in order to get it to turn into a Ron Paul advertisement. That sounds like paranoid delusion to me. The only 2 people who mentioned Ron Paul positively in the thread were myself, and BaronVonBigmeat, so you must be accusing either one of us.

I find the suspicion to be patently ridiculous in the first place, especially if you weren't really implying that myself or Baron were involved, because how could anyone really know where the discussion is going to lead? It's the 'Politics" forum, there are threads created about candidates all the time.

That's a conspiracy theory Kathianne, no matter how you slice it.



Do you have any evidence of such nonsense?

I mean seriously Kathianne, why do you bother participating on a political message board if it's causing you this kind of heartache?

I'm not going to go personal, the way you choose to do over and over again. I have a much right to post what I want, where I choose, unless Scooter or Gunny say, "No."

 

[eots]

What part of you have your own subforum to post your conspiratorial crap don't you get?

I took no "section" from another thread ... I cut YOUR irrelvant post out and put it here.

You get the same deal as the other knucklehead on this board. Post your garbage in the appropriate forum. Every time you attempt to derail a thread with this conspiratorial crap, you get an infraction from this point forward.

Next time you have a question about a USMB staff member's decision, please abide by the rules and PM a staff member concerning that decision.

Thanks.

you changed the title..there is no excuse and you use the same type of distortion you use to deny other facts, as you do this one

 

[eots]

Probably because the right will try to run off any posters that don't exist solely to congratulate them for their opinions.

Think I'm wrong? Explain why air heads like Billo and Rush are the face of the neo-republican party.

Originally Posted by GunnyL
What part of you have your own subforum to post your conspiratorial crap don't you get?

I took no "section" from another thread ... I cut YOUR irrelvant post out and put it here.

You get the same deal as the other knucklehead on this board. Post your garbage in the appropriate forum. Every time you attempt to derail a thread with this conspiratorial crap, you get an infraction from this point forward.

Next time you have a question about a USMB staff member's decision, please abide by the rules and PM a staff member concerning that decision.

Thanks.

you mean like this.....and to top it all off he is lying like a bush..he changed my title on my thread to some homo-erotic fantasy of his about wet dreams

 

[Paulie]

So the management agreed to that? We should all get to have our own forums, with our own parameters. We all pay the same, except Scotter.

Regardless, I never bullied anyone. I simply requested that in that case, to keep the thread on topic. I would like to have an enlightening discussion about economics in that thread, and RP bashing adds nothing to the discussion. Management doesn't need to 'agree' to such a thing. I stated I would request it to be closed if that started happening. There are plenty of other threads where RP can be bashed, in which I would have no qualms, including threads I created. What don't you understand about this?

I'm not going to go personal, the way you choose to do over and over again. I have a much right to post what I want, where I choose, unless Scooter or Gunny say, "No."

Way to address NOTHING in that part of my post where I called you out on your implications.

 

[Annie]

Regardless, I never bullied anyone. I simply requested that in that case, to keep the thread on topic. I would like to have an enlightening discussion about economics in that thread, and RP bashing adds nothing to the discussion. Management doesn't need to 'agree' to such a thing. I stated I would request it to be closed if that started happening. There are plenty of other threads where RP can be bashed, in which I would have no qualms, including threads I created. What don't you understand about this?



Way to address NOTHING in that part of my post where I called you out on your implications.

Hardly. So you just expect the mods to be at your beck and call? You brought the thread into the world, you should be able to take it out? Oh my, wannabe aborter of threads.