Narcoterrorist are competitors of pharmaceutical companies? You think they are trafficking a lot of aspirin?Because they don't like competition. And they employ the government to limit it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Narcoterrorist are competitors of pharmaceutical companies? You think they are trafficking a lot of aspirin?Because they don't like competition. And they employ the government to limit it.
Yup.Narcoterrorist are competitors of pharmaceutical companies?
What dem doesn’t support terrorist?Yup.
I don't know of one. What's your point? Is this another two-party-idiot-************ post?What dem doesn’t support terrorist?
Well you are oneI don't know of one. What's your point? Is this another two-party-idiot-************ post?
OK. I don't vote for idiot-motherfuckers. That's your deal.Well you are one
I don’t know man, you get your aspirin from nacroterroristOK. I don't vote for idiot-motherfuckers. That's your deal.
There is competition for that amount of fentanyl?Because they don't like competition. And they employ the government to limit it.
Yeah. Your suspicions are shit. Fetid, steaming shit.There is competition for that amount of fentanyl?
I suspect that you’re high.
You were there? Having to make split second decisions while a violent mob (of which she was part of) was ransacking the Capitol and you were trying keep people safe? You guys are a trip. And don’t pretend they were just a group of misguided tourists, it is all caught on video and the 149 police officers your “patriots” injured. You are so full of excuses and justifications…but but what about.I've been hearing you lefties using that word 'threat' a lot lately. The thought is really disingenuous considering the fact that you saw nothing wrong with it when Schumer, Piglosi, Pressley, Waters and others did it and incited people to carry out those threats. Coupled with the actual attempts made on Trump's life and the murder of Charlie Kirk, it really lacks any real conviction. Also, it does nothing to address the people who were escorted through the capital bldg. at the same time.
As for the racial aspect of it, Please link to anything I've posted that even slightly insinuated that race had anything to do with it. I would be just as upset if the person who was summarily executed by a DEMOCRAT-controlled excuse for law enforcement was black, native, Asian, Pacific Islander, Hispanic, LGBTQ+, or male. Try again and try to keep your bigotry to yourself. BTW, show me where Ms. Babbitt committed ANY crime more than trespass and I don't want to hear Bbbbut, Bbbbut, Bbbut she COULD have ...
Apparently they do. A lot still escape but at least you aren’t killing civilians and you certainly aren’t going to be able to bomb all of them anyway.How do you intercept a boat that can outrun anything we have with an aircraft or drone, without blowing it out of the f-ing water?
No, they don't. These boats were attacked by helicopters and drones.Apparently they do. A lot still escape but at least you aren’t killing civilians and you certainly aren’t going to be able to bomb all of them anyway.
If we have already done so successfully over and over, we wouldn't need to still be doing it. Bet people are a lot more reluctant now! And Trump already told you that they are able to determine without a doubt that these are drug boats.
What’s wrong with swords? Very effective in their own way….So I can put you down as one against ICBMs and one for a return to the sword and rapier?
Because you end up killing innocent people and who made us judge jury and executioner?No, they don't. These boats were attacked by helicopters and drones.
Why not? You ever try to sneak past an Aegis DDG?
And isn't it convenient that NONE of the other LE on both sides of the door didn't feel that threatened. A compromised cop with a poor record who is nowhere near the victim felt threatened in your partisan mind.Having to make split second decisions while a violent mob (of which she was part of) was ransacking the Capitol and you were trying keep people safe?
Were you? You saw the same video as I did--if you viewed it with a non partisan eye, maybe you'd see differently--devoid of racism as well.You were there?
I haven't defended any of these rioters. I also haven't tried to vilify them as being something they obviously were not. You on the other hand have defended the exact same actions that make this 3-hour riot pale in comparison to democrat actions in 2020.And don’t pretend they were just a group of misguided tourists, it is all caught on video and the 149 police officers your “patriots” injured.
I didn't twist myself into a pretzel to defend a cop that summarily executed an American with NO DUE PROCESS and then accuse a person of racism without the slightest mention of the same. Now try defending YOUR FALSE ALLEGATIONS.You are so full of excuses and justifications
Really? I would not be keen to take the next boat on a drug run to the USA.I doubt people are more reluctant or that it will change anything in the drug trade.
I don't know that any of the boats were fishermen, do you? I don't know any fishermen who take high speed high-powered speed boats hundreds of miles out into international waters, but I have it on good authority that from space, our government can tell what brand cigarettes you are smoking, so I highly doubt we don't know what these boat people are doing.You bomb 5 boats one whom were only fishermen?
Costs far more to send a manned police ship far out into international waters. You still need to guide them from the air or space. Then they must confront the criminals. Far cheaper and safer to locate them from air or space and just drop a bomb on them.You can intercept more at likely less cost than you can bomb and at least if you make a mistake you aren’t murdering people.
Except in the commission of enforcing one's laws. The Fed is charged with protecting our borders and people.Extrajudicial killings are lawless.
Swords hurt like hell. To use one, you must get close enough that your opponent can stab you back.What’s wrong with swords? Very effective in their own way….
And yet you attempt to justify the extrajudicial summary execution of an American citizen for trespass. LMAO SMH.Extrajudicial killings are lawless.
Really? I would not be keen to take the next boat on a drug run to the USA.
I don't know that any of the boats were fishermen, do you? I don't know any fishermen who take high speed high-powered speed boats hundreds of miles out into international waters, but I have it on good authority that from space, our government can tell what brand cigarettes you are smoking, so I highly doubt we don't know what these boat people are doing.
Except when you are wrong. You are executing a civilian. At least have the guts to look him in the face and know who you are murdering.Costs far more to send a manned police ship far out into international waters. You still need to guide them from the air or space. Then they must confront the criminals. Far cheaper and safer to locate them from air or space and just drop a bomb on them.
Except in the commission of enforcing one's laws. The Fed is charged with protecting our borders and people.
Swords hurt like hell. To use one, you must get close enough that your opponent can stab you back.
They know who they are. I did counter-narcotic ops almost 40 years ago.Because you end up killing innocent people and who made us judge jury and executioner?