I did look at it and that site is no better than The National Inquirer. Sad that you cannot tell the difference between that and a credible information source.
Sad that you can't read or have the reading comprehension to see that Clintons could NOT be held criminally responsible for many of those on the body count list and a few of them are unsolved. I posted earlier to SOMEONE ELSE (that means NOT you) that I wasn't claiming such. I just said that where the Clintons are, bodies show up.
You and Reasonable really need to pay closer attention before jumping to conclusions.
BTW.......if you don't like the site I provided that actually substantiates much of your beliefs, then please, by all means, provide 'a credible information source' of your own.......and it'll probably say the same thing
The fact that the site even brings up the issue discounts its credibility. What is sad is that you don't have any critical thinking skills.
Do you have any facts to contribute here? Or you just going to keep criticizing me?
Okay, let's apply some critical thinking skills. For example, what it says about Vince Foster:
"
eRumor Vince Foster – Former White House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.
The Truth:
Vince Foster was Deputy White House Counsel and the Clinton’s lawyer. He was found dead in Fort Marcy Park on July 20, 1993. Three investigations into Foster’s death, including one by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, have concluded that the death was a suicide. Critics of the investigations say Foster’s death does not fit the facts of a suicide and that there are a lot of unanswered questions about his death, some of the activities at the White House after his body was found, and the investigations themselves. Although there are numerous theories about what may have happened to Foster and why, none of them has been proven."
Although it says it was ruled a suicide by authorities and was even investigated by Ken Starr, it does not conclusively discount the belief among Clinton haters that "there are a lot of unanswered questions about his death, some of the activities at the White House after his body was found, and the investigations themselves."
There is nothing here to deter those who want to believe the Clintons were involved in his death. It only says the authorities ruled it suicide, but the people who want to believe in Clinton culpability don't care what they authorities say (unless authorities are saying what they want to hear).
What is written in this piece does not lay to rest anything. What good is it?
I'm not going to read all the others: I have no interest in reading nonsense.