Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,308
- 99,396
- 3,645
Just because you think about that stuff doesn't mean everyone else doesThey're still child fckrs. A decent society won't stand for it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just because you think about that stuff doesn't mean everyone else doesThey're still child fckrs. A decent society won't stand for it
A decent society won't stand for it
If decent society won't stand for it ... you isolate and vilify decent society by labeling it homophobic or racist. Then, when decent society is silenced, no one will stand in the way.
Paranoid nonsenseIf decent society won't stand for it ... you isolate and vilify decent society by labeling it homophobic or racist. Then, when decent society is silenced, no one will stand in the way.
I won't be silenced and there's literally millions like me
Lets sue mckeyD's for making people obese and cause millions of heart attacks1!!! Stupid!!! We should be making it easier to treat these poor peoples problems instead of making their lives hell.
They want to change the definition of decency too. It's all about undermining a society's moral foundation in order to 'build back' to a society that would accept their immorality.They're still child fckrs. A decent society won't stand for it
How was yours?So there isn't a 100% success rate. Like any procedure. I bet it's still pretty damn high.
That's even freakier than the last steaming pile of paranoid crapI think most people, faced with loss of career, and possible criminal prosecution for holding the "wrong" opinions, will gratefully be silenced.
Awww, right wing jackass begs for attention. This must be a day that ends in 'y'.How was yours?
They have changed the definition of 'treat her problem' to butchery and so-called 'transition' instead of helping her accept her natal sex.Looks like someone is being sued for making it easier to mutilate a child.
Why did they make this child's life hell by forcing their ideology on her?
Why didn't they treat her problem?
I think most people, faced with loss of career, and possible criminal prosecution for holding the "wrong" opinions, will grateful
That may have been true in the past however, more and more folks are speaking out against 'wokeism' and many are well known. Even some on the liberal side.I think most people, faced with loss of career, and possible criminal prosecution for holding the "wrong" opinions, will gratefully be silenced.
Paranoid nonse
That may have been true in the past however, more and more folks are speaking out against 'wokeism' and many are well known. Even some on the liberal side.
Not on a 13 year old that's for sure, but a mature 17 year old should be allowed with parental consent imo.
![]()
De-transitioned teen girl sues hospital system over breast-removal surgery at age 13, lawsuit accuses doctors of 'intentional fraud' about transition | Blaze Media
Detransitioner Layla Jane sues Kaiser Permanente hospital system for breast removal surgery, former transgender sues doctors for double mastectomy.www.theblaze.com
How many more children must suffer, and how many will try and take their own lives after the mutilation?
A de-transitioned teen is suing a hospital system over doctors removing her breasts when she was only 13 years old.
Layla Jane is an 18-year-old biological female who began to identify as transgender at age 11. Jane desired to transition to a male at that time. Initially, doctors at the Kaiser Permanente hospital system denied her transition hormones until she turned 16 years old. However, doctors quickly changed course and approved Jane for cross-sex hormones. At age 12, Jane was put through the "torment" of testosterone hormones and puberty blockers.
At age 13, doctors approved and carried out a double mastectomy on Jane.
Jane wrote on Twitter, "Mind boggling to me that a doctor signed off on a double mastectomy for me before I had taken a sex ed course. I barely started 8th grade, I was 13."
The letter of intent to sue accused the doctors of approving the breast-removal surgery "without performing an adequate evaluation and treatment of Layla’s extensive mental health co-morbidities."
The letter from her attorneys at LiMandri and Jonna LLP claimed that Jane suffers from anxiety, depression, pubertal struggles, body dysmorphia, and serious self-image concerns.
"These doctors also pushed Layla and her parents down this transition path engaging in intentional, malicious, and oppressive concealment of important information and false representations," the letter stated.
The lawsuit against Permanente Medical Group and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals also accused the hospital system of "intentional fraud and concealment."
The lawsuit claimed that doctors warned that Jane would have an increased risk of suicide unless she transitioned. Doctors allegedly gave Jane's parents the binary option of a "live son" or a "dead daughter."
The lawsuit is calling for unspecified financial damages related to health issues related to the transition from ages 12 to 17. The lawsuit listed Jane as suffering from permanent irreversible mutilation, an induced state of endocrine disease, an increased risk of being infertile, and will never be able to breastfeed a child.
During an appearance on Fox News with her attorney Harmeet Dhillon, Jane said, "I don't think I'm better off for the experience, and I think transition just completely added fuel to the fire that was my pre-existing conditions."
Dhillon is also representing Chloe Cole – another California teen de-transitioner who sued Kaiser Permanente hospital system last month. Cole had her breasts removed when she was only 15 years old.
Kaiser issued a statement saying that its doctors "practice compassionate, evidence-based medicine founded on sound research and best medical practices."
"When adolescent patients, with parental support, seek gender-affirming care, the patient's care team carefully evaluates their treatment options," Kaiser spokesman Marc Brown said. "The care decisions always rest with the patient and their parents, and, in every case, we respect the patients and their families' informed decisions about their personal health."
One doctors potential malpractice doesn't invalidate trans care for all the patients it's helped.
Their trick is to change the lexicon from child abuse to 'helping the child realize their true gender.' Notice how they always use vague terms or terms that can be taken many ways? Meanwhile they push their focused agenda under the cover of 'help.' It's basically how a scant minority endeavors to present a horrendously evil practice in a benign or even helpful light. It is true evil.Anyone trying to defend child abuse or child sexual assault should be shot. No if's, no buts, no nothing
. They're child abusers. Notice how they avoid this thread! They know we knowTheir trick is to change the lexicon from child abuse to 'helping the child realize their true gender.' Notice how they always use vague terms or terms that can be taken many ways? Meanwhile they push their focused agenda under the cover of 'help.' It's basically how a scant minority endeavors to present a horrendously evil practice in a benign or even helpful light. It is true evil. See the Nazis and Goebbles.
Hahahahahahahaha!Well if the doctors did their due diligence as far as examination and diagnosis goes then she would probably lose the case.
Their trick is to change the lexicon from child abuse to 'helping the child realize their true gender.' Notice how they always use vague terms or terms that can be taken many ways? Meanwhile they push their focused agenda under the cover of 'help.' It's basically how a scant minority endeavors to present a horrendously evil practice in a benign or even helpful light. It is true evil.
See the Nazis and Goebbles.......'We hate those Jews but we want to 'help' so we'll 'transition' them somewhere else.' Only that 'somewhere else' was in concentration camps which were also sold as another 'transition' area. Millions of Jews got 'transitioned' into death. Have I gone too far?