Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #161
You didnt read it did you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You didnt read it did you?
And again, this was introduced as evidence from the prosecution. It does NOT constitute and binding legal fact. If you want to get right down to it, apparently the grand jury did not believe that Plame was covert per the law or Libby would have been indicted for violating one of the laws regarding illegal dissemination of classified information, including the IIPA. What should this tell you, numbskull? That the grand jury didn't believe she was covert under the law any more than I do!
You're a broken record without any substance. The next time someone offers you a crack pipe, you really, REALLY ought to pass on it....
But do you really BELIEVE that Libby's Lawyers would NOT REFUTE the evidence Fitzgerald introduced in his trial if IT WERE NOT TRUE AND REFUTABLE?
That is quite naive!
Care
Gee, you mean the "unclassified summary" which was NEVER introduced at trial? It was presented during the sentencing phase! This is not when new evidence gets admitted in.
Frankly you both need to go back and re-read both Fitzgerald's sentencing memorandum AND Judge Wilson's sentence ruling again. Both indicate that Libby was not tried on anything other than the indictments issued via grand jury. That "summary" is NOT evidence presented in court and as such was never tested under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Try again.
Gee, you mean the "unclassified summary" which was NEVER introduced at trial? It was presented during the sentencing phase! This is not when new evidence gets admitted in.
Frankly you both need to go back and re-read both Fitzgerald's sentencing memorandum AND Judge Wilson's sentence ruling again. Both indicate that Libby was not tried on anything other than the indictments issued via grand jury. That "summary" is NOT evidence presented in court and as such was never tested under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Try again.
Some will do anything to believe lies.
I just cant believe that this guy refuses to realize the CIA, the court system,the grand Jury and all the documentation so that he can continue to believe his parties talking points?
Good point about Libbys lawyers not challenging the Facts surrounding the case Care.