Another 2017 LGBT Court Case, & Specifically Gay Adoption Of Unwanted Kids: A Poll

[Silhouette]

Another false premise of a thread, if the kids are unwanted then why do homosexuals want them, and fight other people for them?????

Actually, that's the entire point of the thread. Meditate Grasshopper...

You meant to discuss a false premise thus you based a thread on something that is false??????????????

Hint: they really want to get at unwanted/unloved kids to bring home. Read the whole OP's points taken together, not separated out of context as you would have them be. The circumstantial evidence (exposure to pride parades lewd sexual acts) taken with their zeal to get at unloved kids (read the stats on child predators and who they target specifically) makes for VERY shaky ground on which LGBTs stand to protest their being denied adoption of the very type of children that need the most rigorous screening of all (considering the points on who child predators zero in on).

 

[elektra]

Another false premise of a thread, if the kids are unwanted then why do homosexuals want them, and fight other people for them?????

Actually, that's the entire point of the thread. Meditate Grasshopper...

You meant to discuss a false premise thus you based a thread on something that is false??????????????

Hint: they really want to get at unwanted/unloved kids to bring home. Read the whole OP's points taken together, not separated out of context as you would have them be. The circumstantial evidence (exposure to pride parades lewd sexual acts) taken with their zeal to get at unloved kids (read the stats on child predators and who they target specifically) makes for VERY shaky ground on which LGBTs stand to protest their being denied adoption of the very type of children that need the most rigorous screening of all (considering the points on who child predators zero in on).

Bullshit

 

[JakeStarkey]

Some of the worst immoral sexual deviants are found among the heterosexual far right, Bob, as you well know.

Sexual predators are mostly concentrated in the gay population. The propensity of gay men to molest boys is insanely outproportioned. Making that worse, they have now come out in "pride" on their deviant sex choices. And they're making these behaviors "binding in law" that others, including Christians, are being forced under duress to respect.
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(11)61074-4/references

Mayo Clinic Special Article 2007

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range
and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles
by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual
pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia),
or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia)......The percentage of homosexual pedophiles
ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20
times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other

^^ Just since the onset of Dumont v Lyon all access to the Mayo Clinic's 2007 special article on pedophilia in full text has been banned. You're only shunted to the abstract and have to pay for the full article, which still exits in full text.

No, pedophilia is found among homosexual and heterosexual populations almost equally.

Since you have not bee able to carry your thesis for years now, I think it is time that you tell us why you are personally so involved.

 

[Silhouette]

Hint: they really want to get at unwanted/unloved kids to bring home. Read the whole OP's points taken together, not separated out of context as you would have them be. The circumstantial evidence (exposure to pride parades lewd sexual acts) taken with their zeal to get at unloved kids (read the stats on child predators and who they target specifically) makes for VERY shaky ground on which LGBTs stand to protest their being denied adoption of the very type of children that need the most rigorous screening of all (considering the points on who child predators zero in on).[/QUOTE]

Bullshit

The circumstantial evidence in the OP suggests other than "bullshit"....

 

[JakeStarkey]

^^ That is an idiotic statement.

And Sil always ignores the abuse of children by heterosexuals.

 

[Syriusly]

Another false premise of a thread, if the kids are unwanted then why do homosexuals want them, and fight other people for them?????

Actually, that's the entire point of the thread. Meditate Grasshopper...

You meant to discuss a false premise thus you based a thread on something that is false??????????????

Hint: they really want to get at unwanted/unloved kids to bring home. .

Shame that the biological heterosexual parents of the children don't want them- and abandoned them.

Shame that you want to prevent these children from having families that do want them.

 

[Syriusly]

The circumstantial evidence in the OP suggests other than "bullshit"....

The 'circumstantial evidence of the OP suggests that Silhouette has a delusional obsession with gays.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The circumstantial evidence in the OP suggests other than "bullshit"....

The 'circumstantial evidence of the OP suggests that Silhouette has a delusional obsession with gays.

Sil really is obsessed and will not discuss the roots of the obsession.

 

[Syriusly]

a) Marriage is a contract between two people- and no one else.
b) Marriage neither ensures children parents, or ensures that there will be children.
c) The Infancy Doctrine does not prevent any contracts involving children- it only says kids can get out of contracts signed on their behalf by their parents.
d) Why do you want imaginary kids to be able to get out of your imaginary marriage contract?

c) The Infancy Doctrine also has a subclause called "Necessities". You might want to take a look at that when you get a minute.

Not a subclause- Necessaries- Necessities- are an exception to the Infancy Clause- so a minor is liable in a contract for necessaries- are you arguing that your imaginary minors would have to pay their parents for being part of your imaginary marriage contract?

Once again- there is nothing in the Infancy Doctrine which prevents parents of real children- from signing contracts on their behalf- let alone your imaginary potential future children.

View attachment 164347

View attachment 164348

Just reposting this- because it is such a clear demonstration of Silhouettes lies.

She claims the Infancy Doctrine would prevent same gender marriage- but the Infancy Doctrine doesn't prevent ANY contract- EVER

Silhouette just lies to attack gays.

 

[Syriusly]

Some of the worst immoral sexual deviants are found among the heterosexual far right, Bob, as you well know.

Sexual predators are mostly concentrated in the gay population. The propensity of gay men to molest boys is insanely outproportioned.
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(11)61074-4/references.

And that is just another lie by Silhouette.

The vast majority of sexual predators are men. And the vast majority of their victims are girls.

Not that you would ever know that reading Silhouette's posts.

Because unless a girl was molested by a woman- she has never pretended to care.

And as far as her citation? Doesn't take you to the full article- here is the full article she doesn't want you to read

http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

And quoting from it:
This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children,

Her own citation contradicts her- she is just lying.

 

[Syriusly]

^^ Just since the onset of Dumont v Lyon all access to the Mayo Clinic's 2007 special article on pedophilia in full text has been banned. You're only shunted to the abstract and have to pay for the full article, which still exits in full text.

LOL- and again Silhouette lies. The article is easily found at the author's website- and she knows it- since I have been citing it for years as she has lied about the study

http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

And of course- the actual article- specifically refutes her claim.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sil, like Big Reb, uses material that specifically refutes her claims.

 

[elektra]

Shame that the biological heterosexual parents of the children don't want them- and abandoned them.

Shame that you want to prevent these children from having families that do want them.

The only shame is that you must be a liar to advance your agenda. It is a shame you can not speak the truth. Sadly, you most likely believe the lies you repeat. Certainly they are not your orginal thought. You are a mimic, a copycat, nothing more, repeating what you hear. And then, with the strong arm of tyranny, you will force 3 year old boys to live in a homosexual lifestyle. This is a lifestyle they would never choose on their own freewill.

Funny thing is. I have seen many children who have seen man and man, or woman and woman kissing and holding hands. The children are always repulsed.

That is my person observation. The children are repulsed, they find it disgusting. Why do children find homosexual behavior to be abnormal?

I guess only God knows?

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, elketra, you saw no such repulsion.

You lie.

Run along.

 

[elektra]

No, elketra, you saw no such repulsion.
You lie.
Run along.

JakeStarkey, there are many things homosexuals do that is repulsive and abnormal. Just because you do not find everything they do to be repulsive does not mean everything is repulsive.

Hell, just on this page of this thread I followed a link that says pedophilia is not a crime. I see that you may of ignored that line or you are not repulsed by that idea?

I find it repulsive. Just as I find your selective outrage as repulsive.

 

[JakeStarkey]

elektra, you have a right to your opinion.

You do not have a right make up fake facts.

 

[Silhouette]

Well pride parades centered around lewd public sex acts done anticipating children in attendance are household knowledge and fact. So she is dealing with the facts. See the OP for details. The circumstantial evidence is pretty damning Jakey.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Why is it your business to butt into other peoples lives?

 

[Silhouette]

Why is it your business to butt into other peoples lives?

Everyone is required by law to act to protect children. I don't have a choice. It's a mandate to go public when you see a problem.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

No, pedophilia is found among homosexual and heterosexual populations almost equally.

The overwhelming vast majority of child molesters are male. Less than 4% of men are homosexual. Yet young boys are molested at a rate not far below that at which girls are molested.

Do the math.

If heterosexuals and homosexuals were equally likely to molest children, then fewer than 4% of molested children would be boys. That boys are molested at a much higher rate than that, proves that a much higher proportion of child molesters are homosexuals. A heterosexual who was also a child molester would only be interested in molesting girls, not boys.