Another 2017 LGBT Court Case, & Specifically Gay Adoption Of Unwanted Kids: A Poll

[TheOldSchool]

The OP doesn’t want kids to have homes. Sick.

The OP wants kids to have safe homes. No home is better than one that regularly takes them to deviant sex parades. Or one that supports public parades celebrating and displaying deviant sex acts.

How many gays do you know who openly denounce gay pride parades?

You want kids to be shuffled around and forgotten in foster care and never have a family. You’re a monster.

 

[jillian]

1. Here's the latest LGBT lawsuit trying to use a handful of lawyers in the judicial branch of government to legislate social policy with huge ramifications for 300 million people: Dumont v Lyons 2017 : Will Fathers (or Mothers) Be Judicially-Legislated Into Irrelevance?

2. We know from hundreds if not thousands of studies on child sexual predators that they embrace deviant sexuality, and that they prey on children mainly from broken homes (more vulnerable):
Grooming: How Child Molesters Create Willing Victims | NAASCA.org - National Association of Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

1. Identifying the possible victim
Children make ideal victims. They are naturally curious, easily led by adults, need lots of attention and affection, and are seeking to establish independence from their parents. Children from broken homes and troubled families are easy targets. The more unlovable the child feels and appears, the less likely the child is to tell on someone who displays love and the less likely anyone is to believe the child if the child ever tells. A child recently caught stealing or lying makes a particularly appealing victim.

3. No gay or lesbian person I know of has ever spoken out publicly about their well-known "pride" parades in public in front of children. So it kind of makes you wonder what they won't speak out about in private either:
(One of the much tamer photos you can google online Get it? "Public Parking"...)

4. To give the benefit of the doubt to the LGBT members: We hear a lot about "loving gay couples" adopting hard-to-place children. A noble act. This family may be just that. But I sure hope they don't plan on taking those kids to a "pride parade". Beyond that even, I hope (and challenge) either one of these men to come out publicly as well to vocally oppose any parent bringing their child to an LGBT "pride" parade". Gentlemen?
The Gay Couple Who Have Opened Their Home (And Hearts) To Special-Needs Kids

The question is, do you support gay or lesbians couples adopting children that are from broken homes, society's rejects or otherwise "unlovable" by many standards? Answer the poll.

braindead troll....

no one is taking away the right of gay couples to adopt children

you should be on meds. and only someone fighting against being gay would obsess over this issue the way you do.

 

[Silhouette]

The OP doesn’t want kids to have homes. Sick.

The OP wants kids to have safe homes. No home is better than one that regularly takes them to deviant sex parades. Or one that supports public parades celebrating and displaying deviant sex acts.

How many gays do you know who openly denounce gay pride parades?

You want kids to be shuffled around and forgotten in foster care and never have a family. You’re a monster.

If the alternative was a home we could predict would perform or expose deviant sex acts in front of those kids, then yes, I am that "monster". While you, no doubt in favor of that degenerate home for them, are "a saint"..

How may gay pride parades have you publicly denounced "Saint TheOldSchool"?

 

[Uncensored2008]

There are no unwanted kids. Waiting periods for adoption are in the length of years.

 

[Silhouette]

There are no unwanted kids. Waiting periods for adoption are in the length of years.

She's talking about the outcasts, the hard-to-place kids like those with deformities or disease. That's going to be the LGBT cult's latest violin performance for our new form of government: The Judicial-Legislature. Brought to you courtesy of pandering, unelected handfuls of lawyers governing the 300 million.

With the blind rubber-stamp in place, our Judicial-Legislature will have inadvertently (or on purpose?) have judicially-legislated fathers and mothers into irrelevance to boys and girls. You watch. Mark my words.

 

[Syriusly]

With LGBT adaption, there is also a high risk that the children will become LGBT too. This may harm the child, but probably okay for the society.

LOL the kids will get infected with homosexuality.....

Is that what happened to you?

 

[TheOldSchool]

The OP doesn’t want kids to have homes. Sick.

The OP wants kids to have safe homes. No home is better than one that regularly takes them to deviant sex parades. Or one that supports public parades celebrating and displaying deviant sex acts.

How many gays do you know who openly denounce gay pride parades?

You want kids to be shuffled around and forgotten in foster care and never have a family. You’re a monster.

If the alternative was a home we could predict would perform or expose deviant sex acts in front of those kids, then yes, I am that "monster". While you, no doubt in favor of that degenerate home for them, are "a saint"..

How may gay pride parades have you publicly denounced "Saint TheOldSchool"?

You can’t predict that. You want children to grow up sad and alone, having never been loved by anyone. You’re basically a Disney villain.

 

[Syriusly]

There are no unwanted kids. Waiting periods for adoption are in the length of years.

She's talking about the outcasts, the hard-to-place kids like those with deformities or disease..

All children up for adoption are 'outcasts'- virtually all are kids who have been abandoned by their biological- and heterosexual parents

Oh- and yeah- lots of kids wait years to be adopted- and thousands age out of the system never having been adopted

Fact Sheets

On any given day, over 415,000 children are living in the U.S. foster care system and the number has been rising. Nearly 108,000 of these children are eligible for adoption and they will wait, on average, four years for an adoptive family.

In 2014, 22,392 (9%) aged out of the U.S. foster care system, and a majority left without the emotional and financial support necessary to succeed in life that other children can receive within a family.

• Without these vital supports, they will fare poorer as a group in postsecondary educational attainment, employment, housing stability, public assistance receipt and criminal justice system involvement.
• 70% of all youth in foster care have the desire to attend college, yet nearly 25% of youth aging out did not have a high school diploma or GED and only a mere 6% had finished a two- or four-year degree after aging out of foster care.[2]

Your solution of course is to ban gay marriage

 

[Syriusly]

There are no unwanted kids. Waiting periods for adoption are in the length of years.

Ah fascinating to hear from those who lead with ignorance? I am guessing you voted for Trump?

On any given day, over 415,000 children are living in the U.S. foster care system and the number has been rising. Nearly 108,000 of these children are eligible for adoption and they will wait, on average, four years for an adoptive family.

In 2014, 22,392 (9%) aged out of the U.S. foster care system, and a majority left without the emotional and financial support necessary to succeed in life that other children can receive within a family.

• 
  
  
  • Without these vital supports, they will fare poorer as a group in postsecondary educational attainment, employment, housing stability, public assistance receipt and criminal justice system involvement.
  • 70% of all youth in foster care have the desire to attend college, yet nearly 25% of youth aging out did not have a high school diploma or GED and only a mere 6% had finished a two- or four-year degree after aging out of foster care.[2]

 

[Syriusly]

I have not been to a single gay pride parade & never will. However, they are infamous. And one need only use Google to see proof of their infamy.

Syriusly, do. you denounce these parades we find evidence of on Google?

Sersiously I denounce your ignorance, lies and hate.

Of course you have never been to a Gay Pride Parade- you just use Google to find images supposedly from Pride Parades which supposedly show what you are looking for- my god you better hope your browser is never checked for porn key words.

I have been to Gay Pride Parades- mostly in San Francisco- one in New York a long time ago. The parades are certainly intended for adults- such as the mom's and dad's of adult homosexuals who march in the parade in support of their children.

That being said- that your first concern when it comes to amazing Dad's who have adopted 4 handicapped kids- kids abandoned by the very straight heterosexuals you claim are the better parents- that your first concern is 'I hope they aren't taking them to a Pride Parade'.

Mine was- I hope those guys get all of the assistance they need to help those kids live a fantastic life.

And that is the difference between you and I.

I see a couple heroically volunteering to raise kids no one else wanted.

You see a couple who are gay- and will probably take their kids a 'gay parade'

 

[Syriusly]

The OP doesn’t want kids to have homes. Sick.

The OP wants kids to have safe homes. No home is better than one that regularly takes them to deviant sex parades.

No- you don't give a damn about whether kids have safe homes.

You are fine with anyone adopting kids- unless they are gay.

Straight man? Okay
Single Straight woman? Okay

Gay couple who adopts 4 handicapped kids "They will be taking them to gay pride parades!"

 

[Syriusly]

How many gays do you know who openly denounce gay pride parades?

How many straight people do you know who openly denounce Mardi Gras parades? Or Carnival parades?

You have gay on the brain. You have never been to a pride parade- all you know about them is through the filter of the angry 'hate the gays' right wing filth mongers.

Here is how perverted and bigoted you are: Gay pride parades are the only qualifying issues you have brought up for adopting kids.

But only for gay couples that want to adopt.

Not whether they have a good home. Not whether or not the parents are clean and sober. Not whether the parents have an adequate income.

Nope- just "are you gay"? If so- would you be taking these kids to Pride Parades?

How many straight people do you know who openly denounce Mardi Gras parades? Or Carnival parades?

You have gay on the brain. You have never been to a pride parade- all you know about them is through the filter of the angry 'hate the gays' right wing filth mongers.

Here is how perverted and bigoted you are: Gay pride parades are the only qualifying issues you have brought up for adopting kids.

But only for gay couples that want to adopt.

Not whether they have a good home. Not whether or not the parents are clean and sober. Not whether the parents have an adequate income.

Nope- just "are you gay"? If so- would you be taking these kids to Pride Parades?

 

[Silhouette]

With LGBT adaption, there is also a high risk that the children will become LGBT too. This may harm the child, but probably okay for the society.

LOL the kids will get infected with homosexuality.....

Is that what happened to you?

Your snark aside, it's funny you should bring that up. Note this review has over 300 peer-reviewed studies backing up its title and conclusion. So, hope the "conditioning" environment the adoption agencies release children into is a functional/healthy one: http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

Conditioning and Sexual Behavior; A Review

James G. Pfaus, Tod E. Kippin, and Soraya Centeno
Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, Concordia
University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Bldg. W., Montreal, Que
́bec, H3G 1M8 Canada

Would you say that LGBTs of all social and economic backgrounds venerating the infamous public lewd "pride" parades would make better or worse parents from a screening perspective, allowing that of course latent/hidden propensity to violate children sexually exists across all behavioral groups? If you were screening two sets of parents to adopt a child, one presented hetero with no history of going to gay pride parades and the other were lesbian with a long and CELEBRATED history of attending these public lewd events, which couple upon the surface would you choose?

 

[anotherlife]

With LGBT adaption, there is also a high risk that the children will become LGBT too. This may harm the child, but probably okay for the society.

LOL the kids will get infected with homosexuality.....

Is that what happened to you?

It is a statistical fact, that more lgbt people come out of gender segregated juvenile housing than go in. It is however not a fact, but only speculation, that the difference is due to being "in the closet".

 

[anotherlife]

With LGBT adaption, there is also a high risk that the children will become LGBT too. This may harm the child, but probably okay for the society.

LOL the kids will get infected with homosexuality.....

Is that what happened to you?

Your snark aside, it's funny you should bring that up. Note this review has over 300 peer-reviewed studies backing up its title and conclusion. So, hope the "conditioning" environment the adoption agencies release children into is a functional/healthy one: http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

Conditioning and Sexual Behavior; A Review

James G. Pfaus, Tod E. Kippin, and Soraya Centeno
Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, Concordia
University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Bldg. W., Montreal, Que
́bec, H3G 1M8 Canada

Would you say that LGBTs of all social and economic backgrounds venerating the infamous public lewd "pride" parades would make better or worse parents from a screening perspective, allowing that of course latent/hidden propensity to violate children sexually exists across all behavioral groups? If you were screening two sets of parents to adopt a child, one presented hetero with no history of going to gay pride parades and the other were lesbian with a long and CELEBRATED history of attending these public lewd events, which couple upon the surface would you choose?

Also, LGBT people put their sexuality above everything, displaying it and forcing it on others. Heterosexuals do that a lot less.

 

[Silhouette]

Also, LGBT people put their sexuality above everything, displaying it and forcing it on others. Heterosexuals do that a lot less.

You noticed? Can you imagine if hetero men and women designed floats for "hetero pride" parades where women only wearing thin panties bent forward in with men's crotches rammed deep "in position" and dry humping them on public display where children were anticipated to attend? How long until those floats were stopped by police and the participants arrested if it was a "hetero-pride parade"? Answer: one nanosecond.

Meanwhile what amounts to felonious child sexual exposure goes on completely unfettered while police look on...

This ^^ is what assisting a felony in progress looks like... Officers? Your excuse? (Remember, ignorance isn't an excuse)

 

[anotherlife]

Also, LGBT people put their sexuality above everything, displaying it and forcing it on others. Heterosexuals do that a lot less.

You noticed? Can you imagine if hetero men and women designed floats for "hetero pride" parades where women only wearing thin panties bent forward in with men's crotches rammed deep "in position" and dry humping them on public display where children were anticipated to attend? How long until those floats were stopped by police and the participants arrested if it was a "hetero-pride parade"? Answer: one nanosecond.

And then, on any tv program, every boob is blacked out, to spare the senses of the children. Or a naked sunbathing girl at the Santa Monica beach gets a ticket, to spare the senses of the children. Plus the Christian Right removes every heterosexual image, to spare the children, then replaces them with these gay ones. No wonder there are more and more gay people in school every day.

 

[Syriusly]

With LGBT adaption, there is also a high risk that the children will become LGBT too. This may harm the child, but probably okay for the society.

LOL the kids will get infected with homosexuality.....

Is that what happened to you?

Your snark aside, it's funny you should bring that up. Note this review has over 300 peer-reviewed studies backing up its title and conclusion. So, hope the "conditioning" environment the adoption agencies release children into is a functional/healthy one: http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

Conditioning and Sexual Behavior; A Review

James G. Pfaus, Tod E. Kippin, and Soraya Centeno
Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, Concordia
University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Bldg. W., Montreal, Que
́bec, H3G 1M8 Canada

Would you say that LGBTs ?

What the hell does a paper on conditioning and sexual behavior in rats- have to do with anything?

Provide a quote from the paper that is relevant to the thread- or you are just once again throwing words on the screen.

 

[Syriusly]

Also, LGBT people put their sexuality above everything, displaying it and forcing it on others. Heterosexuals do that a lot less.

You noticed? Can you imagine if hetero men and women designed floats for "hetero pride" parades where women only wearing thin panties bent forward in with men's crotches rammed deep "in position" and dry humping them on public display where children were anticipated to attend? How long until those floats were stopped by police and the participants arrested if it was a "hetero-pride parade"? Answer: one nanosecond.

Meanwhile what amounts to felonious child sexual exposure goes on completely unfettered while police look on...

This ^^ is what assisting a felony in progress looks like...

Hmmm lets review the photo above:
1) No children are in the picture
2) There is no nudity
3) There is no sexual content.
4) There does appear to be a rainbow flag.

Which in Silhouette's mind constitutes 'assisting a felony'

 

[Silhouette]

^ enter the spamming.