Annie Fani Must Face Hearing In Front of Judge

[sealybobo]

I'm telling you it wasn't Trump's lawyer that brought the issue up It was one of the other co-defendants. And in my opinion that lawyer got ahold of the information from the inside. They're going to have to bail out on her quick or they'll lose all of the credibility that the case is built up till now and no judge will want to continue it.

Nonsense. I just posted this is legal wrangling. "Someone" One of Trump's fixers, found out something and he got a Republican appointed judge to take it seriously. This might just delay the start of the trial until after the election. That's what this is about.

 

[marvin martian]

I see DemoKKKrats are still strongly in favor of people who have sex with their employees.

 

[justoffal]

Nonsense. I just posted this is legal wrangling. "Someone" One of Trump's fixers, found outs something and he got a Republican appointed judge to take it seriously. This might just delay the start of the trial until after the election. That's what this is about.

Huh? You are delusional.... It was one of the 18 co-defendants lawyers.... Not Trump's lawyer.
And I'll guarantee you the information came from Willis's own team.

 

[justoffal]

I see DemoKKKrats are still strongly in favor of people who have sex with their employees.

If this was reversed they would all be screaming for the death penalty. The process is tainted beyond repair I seriously dealt whether or not the case can be saved at all. And I repeat once again five will get you 10 that the information on Willis came from her own legal team.

 

[sealybobo]

There's a difference between dumb and willing ignorant

Like I wonder about Republicans. Are they really stupid enough to believe this matters? This is what good lawyers do to jurors. Like the OJ trial, they made the trial about Mark Furhman and the LAPD. For a week the whole court was about Mark Furhman. It was enough to raise a shadow of a doubt with the jurors".

Anyways, are you Trump supporters really stupid enough to believe Trump is innocent? I don't think so and here's why. Trump flat out admitted when he ran the first time that Bush lied us into Iraq. And you guys voted for him instead of Jeb. So you must have known he was telling the truth. But ask any Republican today if Bush lied us into Iraq they'll say of course not. Or they'll say, "Hillary voted for war too".

But deep down, I know you guys know Trump is a criminal. Scumbag. But he must be your scumbag. And if Biden's a scumbag too in your mind, it's okay Trump is one too.

You guys know. Clinton was great, Bush stole 2000, lied us into Iraq and Obama handed Trump a great economy.

 

[Leo123]

No, not this Annie Fanny

View attachment 889926

This one --

View attachment 889929

Should be interesting. Wonder what kind of excuses she will come up with this time.

About time. Earlier, Kemp The Coward refused to investigate her. shocking, I know

Georgia Trump prosecutor Fani Willis faces hearing on alleged misconduct

A state court in Georgia will hear evidence relating to alleged misconduct by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who launched a case against former President Trump.

www.foxnews.com

Who would poke that brown turd?

 

[justoffal]

Like I wonder about Republicans. Are they really stupid enough to believe this matters? This is what good lawyers do to jurors. Like the OJ trial, they made the trial about Mark Furhman and the LAPD. For a week the whole court was about Mark Furhman. It was enough to raise a shadow of a doubt with the jurors".

Anyways, are you Trump supporters really stupid enough to believe Trump is innocent? I don't think so and here's why. Trump flat out admitted when he ran the first time that Bush lied us into Iraq. And you guys voted for him instead of Jeb. So you must have known he was telling the truth. But ask any Republican today if Bush lied us into Iraq they'll say of course not. Or they'll say, "Hillary voted for war too".

But deep down, I know you guys know Trump is a criminal. Scumbag. But he must be your scumbag. And if Biden's a scumbag too in your mind, it's okay Trump is one too.

You guys know. Clinton was great, Bush stole 2000, lied us into Iraq and Obama handed Trump a great economy.

Doesn't matter.... Legal process has been tainted beyond repair. Most of this trial is a sham set up anyway.... The Behavior of the DA Is probably just a bellwether of what type of standard was applied to this whole thing. What's even more hilarious I think Is that it's almost certain the information on Willis came from inside her own team.

 

[marvin martian]

Like I wonder about Republicans. Are they really stupid enough to believe this matters? This is what good lawyers do to jurors. Like the OJ trial, they made the trial about Mark Furhman and the LAPD. For a week the whole court was about Mark Furhman. It was enough to raise a shadow of a doubt with the jurors".

Anyways, are you Trump supporters really stupid enough to believe Trump is innocent? I don't think so and here's why. Trump flat out admitted when he ran the first time that Bush lied us into Iraq. And you guys voted for him instead of Jeb. So you must have known he was telling the truth. But ask any Republican today if Bush lied us into Iraq they'll say of course not. Or they'll say, "Hillary voted for war too".

But deep down, I know you guys know Trump is a criminal. Scumbag. But he must be your scumbag. And if Biden's a scumbag too in your mind, it's okay Trump is one too.

You guys know. Clinton was great, Bush stole 2000, lied us into Iraq and Obama handed Trump a great economy.

Not a Republican, but yes Bush lied to get us into Iraq. AND Hillary supported that (as she has every other war in her lifetime). AND your party is the war party, and has been since at least the 1990s. AND you're still clinging to election denial conspiracy theories 20+ years later.

Lots of things can be true simultaneously. You'll realize that when you grow up.

 

[justoffal]

Who would poke that brown turd?

A gigolo being paid $900,000.....
Two bottles of Viagra, a bunch of Playboy magazines and a blindfold.

 

[Oddball]

But this really has no bearing on the evidence against the indicted people.

All this does is give racists something to use as an excuse tto express themselves online.

 

[JoeB131]

And you're not

My wife would disagree.

 

[Curried Goats]

Nonsense. I just posted this is legal wrangling. "Someone" One of Trump's fixers, found out something and he got a Republican appointed judge to take it seriously. This might just delay the start of the trial until after the election. That's what this is about.

Actually the judge has been pretty fair and sober so far. Just because he's having a hearing on it doesn't mean he's considering doing anything but having the lawyer who filed it explain why they think any of this should result in dismissal.

 

[marvin martian]

A gigolo being paid $900,000.....
Two bottles of Viagra, a bunch of Playboy magazines and a blindfold.

Don't forget the paper bag!

That's how Bill Clinton gets through it.

 

[justoffal]

Don't forget the paper bag!

That's how Bill Clinton gets through it.

Damn those glad bags..... Haven't seen a good batch of brown paper lunch bags for quite a few years now.

 

[Edgetho]

Not a Republican, but yes Bush lied to get us into Iraq. AND Hillary supported that (as she has every other war in her lifetime). AND your party is the war party, and has been since at least the 1990s. AND you're still clinging to election denial conspiracy theories 20+ years later.

Lots of things can be true simultaneously. You'll realize that when you grow up.

Have to respectfully disagree with you on that one. There was a movie about this, a female interrogator broke Saddam down. Believe it or not, a good movie.

But anyways........ After Desert Shield and then Storm, Saddam wasn't really afraid of the US. At all. He knew that we didn't want anything they had.

But he was deathly afraid of Iran. Remember, they had just got done fighting a very bloody war only a few years earlier. And Iraq won only because the US helped him.

So, after Desert Storm, Saddam had no Military to speak of. What little they had was weak. So, he, almost on his own, came up with the idea of WMD's. That he had them. So he starts talking like he has them and that he's willing to use them. Which nobody doubted because he was an extremely ruthless Dictator. A Ba'athist. Arab socialist.

And all socialists are scum, as we know.

He was very convincing. Iran thought he had Nukes. The Israelis thought he had Nukes, so did MI6 and the French and the Germans and the 2nd best Intelligence Service in the world, Pakistan's ISI.

And so did we. EVERYBODY thought Saddam had Nukes.

Which is why we invaded him.

Bush, was a little paranoid after 9/11. I don't blame him. We had just experienced the most devastating attack on our homeland in 188 years. Worse than Pearl Harbor.

And Saddam kept talking shit like he had Nukes and was willing to use them. Look what he did to the Kurds!!!

Did Bush get duped? Yep. But so did everybody else. The Brits, the French Surete, Japan, Germany, the ISI, the Russians, Mossad -- EVERYBODY.

Bush didn't lie. That is Urban Legend propagated by scumbag dimocrap FILTH.

But he did get snookered. And Saddam got hanged.

 

[JoeB131]

Have to respectfully disagree with you on that one. There was a movie about this, a female interrogator broke Saddam down. Believe it or not, a good movie.

But anyways........ After Desert Shield and then Storm, Saddam wasn't really afraid of the US. At all. He knew that we didn't want anything they had.

But he was deathly afraid of Iran. Remember, they had just got done fighting a very bloody war only a few years earlier. And Iraq won only because the US helped him.

So, after Desert Storm, Saddam had no Military to speak of. What little they had was weak. So, he, almost on his own, came up with the idea of WMD's. That he had them. So he starts talking like he has them and that he's willing to use them. Which nobody doubted because he was an extremely ruthless Dictator. A Ba'athist. Arab socialist.

And all socialists are scum, as we know.

He was very convincing. Iran thought he had Nukes. The Israelis thought he had Nukes, so did MI6 and the French and the Germans and the 2nd best Intelligence Service in the world, Pakistan's ISI.

And so did we. EVERYBODY thought Saddam had Nukes.

Which is why we invaded him.

Bush, was a little paranoid after 9/11. I don't blame him. We had just experienced the most devastating attack on our homeland in 188 years. Worse than Pearl Harbor.

And Saddam kept talking shit like he had Nukes and was willing to use them. Look what he did to the Kurds!!!

Did Bush get duped? Yep. But so did everybody else. The Brits, the French Surete, Japan, Germany, the ISI, the Russians, Mossad -- EVERYBODY.

Bush didn't lie. That is Urban Legend propagated by scumbag dimocrap FILTH.

But he did get snookered. And Saddam got hanged.

That's a nice fairy tale. The problem was, a lot of intelligence people, including Hans Blix and the reprehensible Scott Ritter*, were pretty sure they didn't have WMDs.

(* Ritter is probably kiddy diddler and a Russian stooge today, but back in the day, he was the go to guy for WMDs.)

The point was, the inspectors between 1991 and 1998 were all over Iraq, and they were confident they HAD destroyed most of Saddam's WMD Stockpile and programs.

 

[Edgetho]

That's a nice fairy tale. The problem was, a lot of intelligence people, including Hans Blix and the reprehensible Scott Ritter*, were pretty sure they didn't have WMDs.

(* Ritter is probably kiddy diddler and a Russian stooge today, but back in the day, he was the go to guy for WMDs.)

The point was, the inspectors between 1991 and 1998 were all over Iraq, and they were confident they HAD destroyed most of Saddam's WMD Stockpile and programs.

Clinton was 'pretty sure' that Osama bin Floatin' was no longer a threat and wouldn't approve his assassination. How'd that work out??

I wouldn't trust Hans Blix to give me the time of day. And Ritter was a child rapist. Convicted.

Not surprising you'd take their word over that of Mossad, the CIA and MI6. Too bad both were such scumbags. Had they been respectable.......

Bush got fooled. So did a lot of other people and after 9/11 nobody was in the mood to take a chance with more ragheads.

Kill 'em all. Let Allah sort it out

 

[ColonelAngus]

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW….RIGHT?

 

[JoeB131]

Clinton was 'pretty sure' that Osama bin Floatin' was no longer a threat and wouldn't approve his assassination. How'd that work out??

I wouldn't trust Hans Blix to give me the time of day. And Ritter was a child rapist. Convicted.

Technically, he was convicted of soliciting, and never got near a minor. He's still disgusting, but it doesn't mean that he didn't have expertise on Iraqi WMD programs.

The point is that there wasn't a universal agreement on whether Saddam had WMDs. In fact, there was a LOT of doubt that he did. And that in and of itself was a good reason to NOT launch a war.

Not surprising you'd take their word over that of Mossad, the CIA and MI6. Too bad both were such scumbags. Had they been respectable.......

I wouldn't trust anything the Mossad said. The Zionist would have us fighting every country in the Middle East if they could get away with it.

As for the CIA, they stated pretty clearly they had doubts, but that Bush and Cheney were pushing for intelligence that pointed to the "Saddam has WMD's" position.

Bush got fooled. So did a lot of other people and after 9/11 nobody was in the mood to take a chance with more ragheads.

We've been killing Muslims for 40 years. How is that working out for us again? Seems to me we are just creating more angry Muslims.

 

[22lcidw]

That's a nice fairy tale. The problem was, a lot of intelligence people, including Hans Blix and the reprehensible Scott Ritter*, were pretty sure they didn't have WMDs.

(* Ritter is probably kiddy diddler and a Russian stooge today, but back in the day, he was the go to guy for WMDs.)

The point was, the inspectors between 1991 and 1998 were all over Iraq, and they were confident they HAD destroyed most of Saddam's WMD Stockpile and programs.

On 9/11 we got caught with our pants down. Just like Oct 7 how in the hell did our security agencies did not know about this. Including the Israeli Mossad. So, we are somewhat inept, or these things were planned. We up to 9/11 most likely spent trillions on security agencies, spy agencies, national law enforcement departments and more. And the people ending up losing unalienable rights from it.