Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are not really that stupid are you? Even Murdoch as given up on trump.
Fox News Sours On Carrying Trump Speeches Live, Gives Airtime To Mike Pence
The former vice president got 17 minutes of airtime while giving a speech the same day as Trump, who was appearing a mile away.news.yahoo.com
Who he funded early on is irrelevant. At the end of first term, his closest advisers were his family. The Republican established opposed him. You're revising history if you claim he was anything but an outsider.It is so cute how you rubes call Trump an outsider when he spent his whole adult life funding the establishment and by the end of his term had nothing but swamp critter establishment lifers on his team.
A GOP outsider who was still in the duopoly.Who he funded early on is irrelevant. At the end of first term, his closest advisers were his family. The Republican established opposed him. You're revising history if you claim he was anything but an outsider.
He was a democrat before he became a republican. He went with the party that had the best chance of helping him get elected. Lesser thinkers believe that if you commit to a party, you agree with all aspects.The very second one declares democrat or republican one is no longer an outsider. Of course lesser thinkers believe otherwise.
The voting system of First Past the Post system...A ‘third party’ isn’t the answer, of course.
And the problem isn’t the two-party system.
The problem – as always – is the willful ignorance, apathy, stupidity, and laziness of the American people.
Real solutions and reform come only at the very local level, when voters participate and get involved.
The American people are solely responsible for the bad government they get, not a ‘duopoly.’
A "Libertarian Republican" is a Republican. The only thing that really matters is how you vote. A "libertarian" who votes Republican is like a vegetarian who eats meat.Libertarian Republican - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
"In American politics, a Libertarian Republican is a politician or Republican Party member who has advocated Libertarian policies while typically voting for and being involved with the Republican Party."
That's a hoot. Really. Ask around.You must be a MAGA.
Mmmm hmm. I know lots of Libertarians, and NONE of them vote Republican (or Democrat). Grow a brain.You lie with such ease. I know lots of Libertarians and NONE of them vote Democratic. Read a Book.
Ranked voting system is very popular around the world and produces the generally solid governments...here's the thing... excepting Trump, the professional parties nominated people who could run the country. For instance, in 2012, I hated Romney because I really, really hate Mormons, but I had no doubt Romney could actually run the country, would listen to the generals and the doctors and the scientists, etc.
Nuts like Perot and Nader and Gary "Roll your own" Johnson, not so much.
There's actually a really simple solution. Get rid of the stupidity that is the Electoral college, and have runoff elections. (No, not ranked choice voting, NYC showed what a clusterfuck that is). Then you people can throw your little tantrums in the first rounds and vote for third party nuts and losers, then we get around to voting for the people who can run the country.
Sounds like rebranding the democrats to me. Ranked choice, guns, etc. Ranked choice is just another democrat ploy to stack the elections.
Joeb,Actually, no, a two party system is probably inevitable in our form of government. Largely because the electoral College makes a third party impractical... which is why the Whigs replaced the Federalists and the Republicans replaced the Whigs.
Ranked choice especially in a multi seat areas gives the a way better representation..Sounds like rebranding the democrats to me. Ranked choice, guns, etc. Ranked choice is just another democrat ploy to stack the elections.
Because the majors have a made a career of lesser-of-two-evils. All they have is fear-mongering, and the effects of that fear mongering will be greatly reduced with RCV. The parties will have to produce appealing candidates with good ideas. That scares the bejesus out of them.Ranked choice especially in a multi seat areas gives the a way better representation..
It gives better choice while allowing the voter to pick who they like rather than voting against the one they least like..
Why do you object to that?
No, it's not. It's a genuine improvement on our election process.Ranked choice is just another democrat ploy to stack the elections.
When you narrow the field to the two top vote getters it welcomes corruption. Some states already have ranked voting and democrats have loaded the field in the primary with the expressed intent of getting the top two.Ranked choice especially in a multi seat areas gives the a way better representation..
It gives better choice while allowing the voter to pick who they like rather than voting against the one they least like..
Why do you object to that?
So much fear in removing the lesser-of-evils fear.No, it's not. It's a genuine improvement on our election process.
But perhaps you'd like to explain your position. How is RCV a "democrat ploy"?
But thats not how ranked choice works...When you narrow the field to the two top vote getters it welcomes corruption. Some states already have ranked voting and democrats have loaded the field in the primary with the expressed intent of getting the top two.
First Past the Post always ends up in voting against the worst of the two candidates eventually...So much fear in removing the lesser-of-evils fear.
How do we get them to not fear?
