And to think liberals crave more of this...

David Vitter is a cock.


EPA should be more diligent with their studies and not assume all participants are aware of the risks.


But the Cock Vitter, like most Tea Brains, turns this political.


GOP hacky.
 
I guess when you can't dispute the message, the only thing you can do is attack the messenger and hope that distracts people from the issue :eusa_whistle:
I stated that the risks should have been disclosed. It's where in this thread I did so that I did not remember correctly. Carry on.
 
David Vitter is a cock.
EPA should be more diligent with their studies and not assume all participants are aware of the risks.

But the Cock Vitter, like most Tea Brains, turns this political.

GOP hacky.
Vitter the Shitter as the hookers know him, diaper fetish and all.
 
David Vitter is a cock.


EPA should be more diligent with their studies and not assume all participants are aware of the risks.


But the Cock Vitter, like most Tea Brains, turns this political.


GOP hacky.

Yeah, because that is what happened. This wasn't a case of the EPA malicious and maniacally exposing children to cancer. Noooo.... This was just a case of the EPA assuming that the participants (inexplicably) should have known that they were being subjected to carcinogens. :eusa_doh:

Keep defending the indefensible genius. It's making you look so good to defend the heinous, despicable, and Nazi Joseph Mengel-like experiments on children.
 
Back
Top Bottom