And so it begins.

[jc456]

If you believe his win was an endorsement of all the positions he holds and all the promises he made you are simply mistaken.

Unless you have evidence to prove a majority of Americans want Zuckerberg to be locked up for life.

Keep telling yourself that!!! hahaahahahahahaahahahahahaa

 

[OKTexas]

Go for it.

You got it skippy.

.

 

[otto105]

you have me confused with someone you think you can control or cares. LOL, you're a cuck and a compliant dick. go kiss the ass you've been kissing cuck!

Hilarious

Mat geatz

 

[OKTexas]

His SC overruled (by a 5-4 vote) a lower court, deciding Congress did not have the right to sue over expropriating funds under an emergency declaration. It left all other pending matters undecided since Biden reversed the policy.

Yep, they ruled according to the law and left politics out of it. And those policies will be back come Jan.

.

 

[jc456]

Hilarious

Mat geatz

You still have me confused with someone else. wow.

 

[otto105]

You still have me confused with someone else. wow.

I don’t.

You’re a sycophant to the orange cult.

Just own it.

 

[jc456]

I don’t.

You’re a sycophant to the orange cult.

Just own it.

I own quite a few things. I don't own the government.

 

[otto105]

I own quite a few things. I don't own the government.

No, the cult leader owns you. You kneel to his desire for dictatorship.

That makes you toady.

 

[hadit]

Trump should announce run for 2024 soon to avoid indictment, source says​

Donald Trump “has to” announce a campaign for the Republican presidential nomination in 2024 in the next two weeks, according to a senior source close to Trump, if the former president wants to head off being indicted under the Espionage Act after the FBI search at Mar-a-Lago last week.

In communications reviewed by the Guardian, the source indicated Trump needed to announce because politically it would be harder for the US Department of Justice (DoJ) to indict a candidate for office than a former president out of the electoral running.

Trump should announce run for 2024 soon to avoid indictment, source says

Source close to Donald Trump suggested the justice department would find it trickier to prosecute a presidential candidate

www.theguardian.com

The strategy to avoid indictment failed. So he did the next best thing. Make specious claims of election interference. And you guys fell for it like you always do.

Oh, well, that clinches it. You got him now.

 

[OKTexas]

It's not a poll at all.

Really, from the link:

The Scripps News/Ipsos survey’s findings come as former President Trump and his allies have intensely focused on immigration in the 2024 election cycle.


About 54 percent of respondents — 86 percent of Republicans, 58 percent of independents and 25 percent of Democrats — said they “strongly” or “somewhat” support a wide-scale effort to deport millions of immigrants, and 59 percent said they are closely following the “immigration situation at the U.S.-Mexico border.”

You didn't even open the link, did ya ignorant commie?

.

 

[berg80]

Really, from the link:

The Scripps News/Ipsos survey’s findings come as former President Trump and his allies have intensely focused on immigration in the 2024 election cycle.


About 54 percent of respondents — 86 percent of Republicans, 58 percent of independents and 25 percent of Democrats — said they “strongly” or “somewhat” support a wide-scale effort to deport millions of immigrants, and 59 percent said they are closely following the “immigration situation at the U.S.-Mexico border.”

You didn't even open the link, did ya ignorant commie?

.

ACLU files lawsuit seeking details on Trump’s plan for mass deportation

Civil-liberties lawyers alarmed by President-elect Donald Trump’s plan to launch mass deportations of undocumented immigrants sued the federal government Monday for information about how authorities might quickly remove people from the United States.

The federal lawsuit alleges that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has failed to respond to requests for basic information about its existing contracts with private airline companies that make up “ICE Air,” as well as ground transportation services, airfields and policies governing deportation flights, including those carrying children.

Lawyers said the information is urgent because of Trump’s election victory this month and his upcoming inauguration on Jan. 20. Advocates for immigrants have accused ICE and its contractors of treating migrants harshly and holding them in inhumane conditions.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2024/11/18/trump-mass-deportation-aclu-lawsuit/

I'm going to have to send them another $100.

 

[berg80]

Really, from the link:

The Scripps News/Ipsos survey’s findings come as former President Trump and his allies have intensely focused on immigration in the 2024 election cycle.


About 54 percent of respondents — 86 percent of Republicans, 58 percent of independents and 25 percent of Democrats — said they “strongly” or “somewhat” support a wide-scale effort to deport millions of immigrants, and 59 percent said they are closely following the “immigration situation at the U.S.-Mexico border.”

You didn't even open the link, did ya ignorant commie?

.

From your link, on page 4, by a margin of 20% to 18% poll responders favored "offering a path to citizenship" over "deporting those who are in the country illegally."

Polls say voters back “mass deportation.” That’s misleading.

This spring, an eye-opening poll from Axios suggested what once seemed unthinkable: Four in 10 Democrats were open to the idea of the US government deporting undocumented immigrants en masse. Though that share of support might seem high, other polls conducted since have found something similar, suggesting Americans at large are open to harsher, more Trumpian immigration policies.

And yet, as attention-grabbing as some of the headlines on support for mass deportations have been (and as former President Donald Trump and his allies continue to talk about his plans for such), those polls may not accurately capture the mood of the American electorate. Support for a policy of mass deportation, while superficially high, rests on two related complications: substantial confusion among voters about what it might actually entail, as well as a generalized desire to do something — anything — on immigration, which polls frequently report to be among Americans’ top issues.

That disconnect is because standalone polls and headlines do very little to capture the complexity of many Americans’ feelings about immigration, which often include simultaneous, and apparently contradictory, support for more immigrant-friendly policies alongside draconian ones. The real answer, more specific polling by firms like Pew Research Center suggests, lies somewhere in the middle: A good share of voters, it seems, are fine with increasing deportations. Some might even want the kind of operation Trump is floating. But many also want exceptions and protections for specific groups of immigrants who have been living in the US for a while, or have other ties to the country.

Polls say voters back “mass deportation.” That’s misleading.

Americans’ opinions on immigration are more complicated than any one question can capture.

www.vox.com

 

[OKTexas]

ACLU files lawsuit seeking details on Trump’s plan for mass deportation

Civil-liberties lawyers alarmed by President-elect Donald Trump’s plan to launch mass deportations of undocumented immigrants sued the federal government Monday for information about how authorities might quickly remove people from the United States.

The federal lawsuit alleges that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has failed to respond to requests for basic information about its existing contracts with private airline companies that make up “ICE Air,” as well as ground transportation services, airfields and policies governing deportation flights, including those carrying children.

Lawyers said the information is urgent because of Trump’s election victory this month and his upcoming inauguration on Jan. 20. Advocates for immigrants have accused ICE and its contractors of treating migrants harshly and holding them in inhumane conditions.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2024/11/18/trump-mass-deportation-aclu-lawsuit/

I'm going to have to send them another $100.

So you got caught red handed in a LIE, and all you've got is deflection. BTW, Trump can tell the ACLU to piss up a rope, he has the law on his side.

.

 

[boedicca]

Trump transition figure warns DOJ lawyers: Get on board or get out

A conservative lawyer working on Donald Trump’s transition, Mark Paoletta, offered a stark warning to career Justice Department lawyers Monday that those who refuse to advance Trump’s agenda should resign or face the possibility of being fired.

“Once the decision is made to move forward, career employees are required to implement the President’s plan,” Paoletta wrote in a post on X responding to a POLITICO story detailing widespread fear among DOJ lawyers about being asked to advance or defend policies they consider unethical or illegal.

“If these career DOJ employees won’t implement President Trump’s program in good faith, they should leave,” Paoletta said. “Those employees who engage in so-called ‘resistance’ against the duly-elected President’s lawful agenda would be subverting American democracy (or upholding it). … [t]hose that take such actions would be subject to disciplinary measures, including termination.”

Paoletta recited a laundry list of Trump goals, including mass deportations, ending birthright citizenship, issuing pardons and commutations to Jan. 6 defendants, reversing “lawfare and persecution of political opponents,” and “holding accountable those who weaponized their government authority to abuse Americans.”
https://www.politico.com/live-updat...-paoletta-justice-department-lawyers-00188772

Let's begin with this, trump's goal coming in to the start of his admin is to purge the government of those viewed to be disloyal. This has been well advertised.

Now consider the ACLU plans to challenge the legality of trump using the law he plans to use to facilitate mass deportations.

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/i-heard-an-interesting-interview-with-the-head-of-the-aclu-yesterday.1134492/#post-35690588

If members of the DoJ agree with the ACLU's position, will they be fired before the matter can be adjudicated? Because it seems to me the admin is already looking for a pretense to fire people opposed to their policies...........policies which may be illegal.

In his first admin a number of high ranking DoJ officials said they world resign if Jeff Clark was made acting AG. No such officials will be part of the new admin if trump has his way.

To be clear, if DoJ employees try to block legal and ethical policy goals firing them is appropriate.

Sounds good to me. The President is the head of the Excutive Branch. Anyone who doesn't want to follow directions should resign, and if they don't, they should be fired.

 

[daveman]

Trump Intends to Use Emergency Powers and the Military for Deportations​

President-elect Donald J. Trump intends to declare a national emergency over immigration and use the military as part of his plans for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants, according to a post he made Monday on social media.

Mr. Trump confirmed his plans to use the broad emergency powers afforded to the president as he moved to stock his cabinet with loyal allies, some of whom have drawn deep scrutiny over their qualifications and personal conduct.

Trump Transition: Lawyer Says Client Saw Gaetz Have Sex With Underage Girl

The client’s reported testimony before the House Ethics Committee added to the controversy around Donald Trump’s pick for attorney general as the president-elect tries to fill his cabinet.

www.nytimes.com

It certainly isn't his first attempt to abuse the use of emergency powers.

After years of Trump administration threats against the International Criminal Court, the president declared a national emergency this month so he could impose sanctions to intimidate the court out of pursuing investigations of Americans and nationals of some other countries. The move is a gross abuse of emergency powers, undermines the core American values of human rights and rule of law, and weakens our country’s standing internationally by alienating us from our allies.

If there were a prize for actions that simultaneously affront both domestic and international law, this executive order would certainly be a contender. But unfortunately, the law that President Trump invoked, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), is so broad and subject to so few Congressional checks that guardrails are scant. This egregious action by the president is a cry for reforms.

Trump’s Latest Abuse of Emergency Powers Highlights a Dangerous Law in Need of Change

The president’s threat of sanctions against the International Criminal Court for investigating Americans for war crimes in Afghanistan shows just how badly Congress needs to reform the law.

www.brennancenter.org

Oh, the ICC, the "court" that wants to punish Israel for defending herself against genocidal psychopaths?

It's cute that you believe they have any credibility. And by "cute", I mean "retarded".

 

[daveman]

The media didn't cover trump's campaign?

They covered it. They didn't cover it positively. They were too busy sucking the Harris campaign's ass and telling America how much we love her.

 

[daveman]

So you got caught red handed in a LIE, and all you've got is deflection. BTW, Trump can tell the ACLU to piss up a rope, he has the law on his side.

.

No, see, it's racist to expect non-whites to obey the law! They're too dumb!

Or so white Democrats believe.

 

[daveman]

The American people rejected inflation. trump's positions on mainstream issues remain unpopular with a majority of Americans.

Remember, these are the same pollsters that assured us Harris would win.

Idiot.

 

[daveman]

Your beliefs on that topic are a sign you've been disinformed.

You wish.

The 5th Circuit Agrees That Federal Officials Unconstitutionally 'Coerced' or 'Encouraged' Online Censorship​

And you were okay with it.

Fascist.

 

[daveman]

Oh, well, that clinches it. You got him now.

THIS IS HOW HARRIS CAN STILL WIN