A skilled machinist can get a job anywhere.
The U.S. Occupations at Greatest Risk of a Labor Shortage
That's the problem. Those without skills:
America has near record 5.8 million job openings
Hillary Clinton wants to educate Americans to fill those jobs that actually exist.
Trump wants to bring jobs back from China. Jobs that don't exist. He's just lying. Flat out lying.
I can get a job anywhere paying middle class wages,
the problem is you have to start them young and liberals ruined generations of kids by saying it is ok for single mothers.
God damn all the tech training in the world can't teach kids the
basic mechanical appitutde.
Red:
"Liberals" did not collectively do that. Individuals failed to take responsibility, ownership for themselves and they did it, for whatever reason(s), one by one.
Blue:
Given the nature of the shift in the global economy, comparatively few folks these days need or will benefit greatly from having well developed mechanical aptitudes. That skillset used to be in high demand. What is now greatly demanded by employers is analytical aptitude. That can be taught to folks of average or higher intellect, but, generally, it takes longer for a typical individual to build those skills than does developing the mechanical skills that were highly valued in the last millennium.
And according to Bill Gates, who seems to live on Capitol Hill, that analytical ability can only come from India or an African nation.
What's a concrete example of analytical aptitude?
And why do employers use the meme...Americans don't have the skill-set, as in an ACTUAL skillset?
Analytic thinking needs to be taught starting young. Their brains may not be matured enough to do abstract thinking until adolescence, but the procedures, the thinking steps involved, can become like second nature by then. Analytic thinking is being pushed by the Common Core and by the new GED tests, but it actually
requires updated texts and materials and better prepared teachers. A lot of teachers are just good at it naturally, but
abstract thinking .... it's not like learning Civics or Biology 101. American education needs a lot of work, from the inside out.
I, in general, agree with you on that.
Red:
Ideally, yes. Starting young certainly eliminates the need to correct for years of nonexistent or poor analytical and critical thinking.
Blue and Pink:
I definitely agree with that, at least with regard to a material, even if not majority, share of public education strategy, topics, teachers and tactics.
Pink:
The texts are there. I know that because my children and mentorees have used them and they are quite adept at applying the lessons in those texts. I realize too that the textbooks alone aren't the solution, even thought they are one part of it.
Fluorescent Green:
The most effective, but not necessarily the best, abstract thinkers are innovators. (That's not to say that every innovator is a good abstract thinker or that every good abstractionist is an innovator.) They focus on opportunities and how to bring them to fruition rather than impediments that impede making "their vision" come to light. They are not bound by what is or was, but can take what is or was and build upon it or transform it.
Abstract thinking (some folks call it "analytical thinking," others call it "critical thinking") is definitely different, but mastering the lessons of civics or biology calls for students to apply abstract thinking skills. I happen to think that every school subject provides opportunities for teaching and practicing abstract and critical thinking skills.
Life after school also provides ample opportunities to apply abstract thinking skills. I don't expect lots of folks to apply their abstract thinking skills to create new things like cell phones or new services like Airbnb. I do expect most folks to practically apply the little bit of abstract thinking it takes to "read the writing on the wall" and realize that they need reinnovate themselves so they can continue to work at a "good paying" job of some sort.