Analysis: What the CCP Fears if U.S. Can Negotiate an End to Russian-Ukraine War

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
19,638
Reaction score
35,712
Points
2,430
Analysis: What the CCP Fears if U.S. Can Negotiate an End to Russian-Ukraine War
6 Mar 2025 ~~ By Dorothy Li

If President Donald Trump can negotiate a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, communist China could become the next target of the United States, analysts say.
During a phone call on Feb. 24, Chinese leader Xi Jinping reaffirmed the “no limit” partnership he declared three years ago with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
In a show of unity, Xi told Putin that their nations are “good neighbors” and “true friends who have been through thick and thin together,” according to Beijing’s readout.
Analysts said the warm sentiments expressed as the war in Ukraine marks its third year reflect the Chinese regime’s serious concerns.
Xi Jinping’s greatest fear is that Putin might lean towards Trump” or even facilitate U.S. efforts to contain his regime, Cai Shenkun, an independent Chinese current affairs commentator, told The Epoch Times.
According to Cai, the alliance between the two autocracies is not as solid as it appears. He said that the war in Ukraine has acted as a catalyst, forging a closer bond between Beijing and Moscow and their economies. Once a cease-fire is reached, however, some longstanding friction points in their partnership, such as territorial disputes along their shared border, may resurface.
Additionally, Beijing’s support of Moscow’s war effort has strained its ties with Washington and Brussels, he said.
U.S. officials have repeatedly criticized China for helping Russia to rebuild its defense-industrial complex through the export of goods that can be used for both civilian and military purposes, thus providing Moscow an economic lifeline amid Western sanctions.
Meanwhile, European leaders, including the NATO secretary-general, are reconsidering their reliance on authoritarian regimes, especially in light of the largest armed conflict in Europe since World War II.
“In the past, we made the mistake of becoming dependent on Russian oil and gas. We must not repeat that mistake with China: Depending on its money, its raw materials, and its technologies,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said at an event in April 2024. “Dependencies make us vulnerable.”
Cai said that as global distrust toward communist China rises, the regime could find itself sidelined once the conflict in Ukraine ends and Putin no longer needs Xi’s support.
“Neither Ukraine nor Russia will be grateful to China [for the war]. Europe certainly won’t either,” Cai said. “Xi was left with little choice but to place his bets on Putin.”
A Shift in US Focus Toward China
Chen Shih-min, an expert on Western Europe security and the Chinese military at the National Taiwan University in Taipei, echoed those viewpoints. Beijing and Moscow are bonded by common interests, he said, which means they'll diverge once these interests conflict.
Chen said that once the Ukraine war is settled, the Trump administration’s intention may be to shift its focus to driving Beijing and Moscow apart and confronting the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Trump will come down hard on the CCP,” Chen told The Epoch Times.
U.S. defense leaders have indicated a strategic pivot toward countering threats from communist China.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has described communist China as a peer competitor with the “capability and intent to threaten our homeland and core national interests in the Indo-Pacific.”
“The U.S. is prioritizing deterring war with China in the Pacific, recognizing the reality of scarcity, and making the resourcing tradeoffs to ensure deterrence does not fail,” Hegseth said in his opening remarks at the Ukraine Defense Contact Group in Brussels on Feb. 12.
This shift in focus extends beyond the U.S. military.
~Snip~
The Endgame of Communist Rule in China?
Activist Qin Jin said that despite the absence of any “clear sign” pointing to an immediate fall of the CCP, he won’t be surprised if it all unravels overnight, much like the collapse of the Soviet Union, which few in the West foresaw until it actually happened in 1991.
Qin highlighted the secrecy that cloaks authoritarian regimes, likening the CCP’s internal workings to the Iron Curtain of the Soviet era, dubbing it the “Bamboo Curtain” in China.
What lies behind the Bamboo Curtain is almost impossible to know until the authorities choose to reveal it,” Qin, the chairman of the pro-democracy Federation for a Democratic China in Australia, told The Epoch Times.
As an example of the regime’s opacity, Qin cited Beijing’s tight control of information related to COVID-19, which first emerged in the central Chinese city of Wuhan five years ago.
To this day, Beijing has resisted any international investigation into the origin of the pandemic, leaving the world in the dark about how the pandemic erupted in China.
It only becomes more secretive when it comes to the country’s power center.
Qin pointed to the mystery surrounding the death of former No. 2 official Li Keqiang in October 2023, seven months after he stepped down as premier.
Li’s death at the age of 68 raised eyebrows among China watchers, who highlighted the Party elites’ record of longevity. Li’s two immediate predecessors, Wen Jiabao, 83, and Zhu Rongji, 96, are still living.
Some commentators speculated that Li’s passing coincides with political infighting within the Party’s top brass. A string of senior officials and military commanders, including the former foreign minister Qin Gang and defense minister Li Shangfu, had been abruptly removed from office after unexplained disappearances.
“The details of Li Keqiang’s death will surely be disclosed in the future,” Qin said. “When? After the collapse of the communist regime.
Discontent among law enforcement personnel is surging within the major cities. Recently, Qin spoke with a police chief from a provincial capital who had fled overseas—an indication of unrest even among the high ranks of the public security bureaus, which are usually under tight CCP control.


Commentary:
“Dependencies make us vulnerable.” ~~~~ But Germany's leaders laughed at Trump when he warned them not to become dependent upon Russian natural gas circa 2018. Then they froze their asses off in the winter of 2022-23. Now they are agreeing with him (but of course will give him no credit for being right).
Xi Jinping would like the war to continue to weaken both rivals. His first move may be on the Manchuria Peninsula, not Taiwan. Much more to gain with less effort. Xi says he is friends with Putin. Putin knows better. But for the present time they are allies against the West and especially the U.S.
The fact is that the both the Russian and Chinese populations are declining, but it’s more of a problem for Russia now. while the suicide rate in China is much lower.
 
If America fails to destroy Russia then the only othere alternative is in taking on China.

But that means that the US aggressor will be taking on a united Brics that includes Russia and Iran, instead of just China.

This is the reason why Trump can't possibly end America's war against Russia.

America hasn't run roughshod over 40 countries, just to be stopped short of the final victory against Russia. The reason for all the aggression by the US has always been the destruction of Russia, the final prize. Without victory over Russia, all the others become a waste of the people's money.

Has America delayed too long, and is now facing a greater military power than America?

Could that be Trump's real reason for wanting a peace deal with Russia?

It certainly does appear that Russia now has the army and the weapons they need to destroy any army and navy America can stand up.
 
If America fails to destroy Russia then the only othere alternative is in taking on China.

But that means that the US aggressor will be taking on a united Brics that includes Russia and Iran, instead of just China.

This is the reason why Trump can't possibly end America's war against Russia.

America hasn't run roughshod over 40 countries, just to be stopped short of the final victory against Russia. The reason for all the aggression by the US has always been the destruction of Russia, the final prize. Without victory over Russia, all the others become a waste of the people's money.

Has America delayed too long, and is now facing a greater military power than America?

Could that be Trump's real reason for wanting a peace deal with Russia?

It certainly does appear that Russia now has the army and the weapons they need to destroy any army and navy America can stand up.
The new weapon they used on the Ukraine gives a whole new ( updated ) meaning to blitzkrieg. Imagine that being used on London , Paris and Washington, D.C. It's a game changer plus their other hypersonic weapons we aren't suppose to know about. It's mind boggling. To.waste that much time and energy on hatred and weapons of war.
 
The new weapon they used on the Ukraine gives a whole new ( updated ) meaning to blitzkrieg. Imagine that being used on London , Paris and Washington, D.C. It's a game changer plus their other hypersonic weapons we aren't suppose to know about. It's mind boggling. To.waste that much time and energy on hatred and weapons of war.
The mind can make some sense of it if it's considered to be a defense against more US aggression.

Then Russia and China arming Iran with the necessary weapons has indeed given defense against US wars, a whole new meaning.
 
If President Donald Trump can negotiate a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, communist China could become the next target of the United States, analysts say.

No, China has always been the target of the US and Russia is a necessary stepping stone to US world supremacy.

Trump won't be permitted to negotiate a peace between Russia and the US. Even if he genuinely wanted to!
 
I doubt very much Trump wants war
He doesn't want war, he wants victory.

Victory to Trump is a personal thing in which hes greatest need of humiliating any world leader who stands up against Trump is satisfied. Currently the biggest prize is Putin.

And that prevents him from even dreaming of humiliating Xi Jin Ping.
 
I doubt very much Trump wants war
Trump is perhaps the most anti-war President this country has ever had. That should not be characterized as pacifism though. Trump strongly believes in the Reagan Doctrine of peace through strength, i.e. a military power so great and a willingness to use it if America or Americans or our allies are attacked so that nobody dares mess with us. That philosophy as #45 achieved the closest thing to world peace that any of us had ever known. Had he been re-elected in 2020, there would be no war between the Ukraine and Russia and it is highly unlikely Hamas would have been an Oct 7.

However difficult it now us due to the fecklessness and incompetence of the Biden Administration, if anyone can bring an end to those conflicts and their satellite mini wars, Trump can do that. You can be sure he is doing everything possible to achieve that.
 
The mind can make some sense of it if it's considered to be a defense against more US aggression.

Then Russia and China arming Iran with the necessary weapons has indeed given defense against US wars, a whole new meaning.
I wonder if they would settle down if we gave them Canada?
 
Trump is perhaps the most anti-war President this country has ever had.
The anomaly of war against Russia can't be compared to the other wars America started against countries that couldn't be a serious challenge. Hence, Trump can't be compared to other presidents.
That should not be characterized as pacifism though. Trump strongly believes in the Reagan Doctrine of peace through strength, i.e. a military power so great and a willingness to use it if America or Americans or our allies are attacked so that nobody dares mess with us. That philosophy as #45 achieved the closest thing to world peace that any of us had ever known. Had he been re-elected in 2020, there would be no war between the Ukraine and Russia and it is highly unlikely Hamas would have been an Oct 7.
There's no prize waiting for Trump. Russia will go nuclear before accepting defeat.
However difficult it now us due to the fecklessness and incompetence of the Biden Administration, if anyone can bring an end to those conflicts and their satellite mini wars, Trump can do that. You can be sure he is doing everything possible to achieve that.
Biden started an unwinnable war against Russia and then turned it over to Trump to deal with.

And now Trump can't sell the whole farm to Russia in exchange for satisfying Trump's ego and mental illness of sociopathy. The military and the American people won't accept losing the whole farm.
 
The mind can make some sense of it if it's considered to be a defense against more US aggression.

Then Russia and China arming Iran with the necessary weapons has indeed given defense against US wars, a whole new meaning.
They have always funded our enemies. BRICs is to replace our currency and make us fall economically.

Iran is no military threat other than terrorism. if we take the gloves off with them in total War they are screwed.

China is the elephant in the room
 
There's no prize waiting for Trump. Russia will go nuclear before accepting defeat
Which is why since WWII we have not gone directly to War with them. We have fought on other battlefields by arming opposing sides.

Russia will use Iran as just another proxy. Iran doesnt care about Russia or China and neither do they care about Iran.

EU is getting cocky. In their Butt Hurt that Trump is ABANDONING THEM BOO FUCKING WHO.... They are planning massive rearming. They have a history of starting World Wars.
 
They have always funded our enemies. BRICs is to replace our currency and make us fall economically.

Iran is no military threat other than terrorism. if we take the gloves off with them in total War they are screwed.

China is the elephant in the room
Yes, Iran would be screwed but so will the Zionist regime and US assets in the region.

Likely aircraft carriers within a thousand miles.

That's my opinion and thanks for your interest.

appropriate behaviour is required from you now.
 
Biden started an unwinnable war against Russia and then turned it over to Trump to deal with.

And now Trump can't sell the whole farm to Russia in exchange for satisfying Trump's ego and mental illness of sociopathy. The military and the American people won't accept losing the whole farm.
The War started in 2014. With idiots pushing for NATO memborship to Ukraine. When power changed Russia stirred the pot with civil War in Donbas.

Later they moved to their real goal of SECURING ACCESS TO THE BLACK SEA.

This War is about the Black Sea and Russia ensurung that access.
 
The anomaly of war against Russia can't be compared to the other wars America started against countries
Like WW2, mouthy?
You sent 1 million, of which 45,000 died. We sent 16 million with 400,000 dead. We didn't start it, but we did finish it for you. I think we should reverse those numbers for the next round...
 
Yes, Iran would be screwed but so will the Zionist regime and US assets in the region.

Likely aircraft carriers within a thousand miles.

That's my opinion and thanks for your interest.

appropriate behaviour is required from you now.
Still demanding people to kneel to you clown.

 
Still demanding people to kneel to you clown.


Yep. But Zelenskiy's parody is even funnier.
IMG_20250324_075237.webp


 
Back
Top Bottom