- Sep 9, 2022
- 24,853
- 12,147
- 1,288
What is the first word Democrats say about income taxes? Rip off the rich they claim. This is an analysis by the Government as to how that works.
Tax Rates and Tax Revenues High marginal tax rates discourage work effort, saving, and investment, and promote taxavoidance and tax evasion. A reduction in high marginal tax rates would boost long termeconomic growth, and reduce the attractiveness of tax shelters and other forms of tax avoidance.The economic benefits of ERTA were summarized by President Clinton's Council of EconomicAdvisers in 1994: "It is undeniable that the sharp reduction in taxes in the early 1980s was astrong impetus to economic growth." Unfortunately, the Council could not bring itself toacknowledge the counterproductive effects high marginal tax rates can have upon taxpayerbehavior and tax avoidance activities. Since 1984 the JEC has provided factual information about the impact of the tax cuts of the1980s. For example, for many years the JEC has published IRS data on federal tax payments ofthe top 1 percent, top 5 percent, top 10 percent, and other taxpayers. These data show that afterthe high marginal tax rates of 1981 were cut, tax payments and the share of the tax burden borneby the top 1 percent climbed sharply. For example, in 1981 the top 1 percent paid 17.6 percent ofall personal income taxes, but by 1988 their share had jumped to 27.5 percent, a 10 percentagepoint increase. The graph below illustrates changes in the tax burden during this period.
Tax Rates and Tax Revenues High marginal tax rates discourage work effort, saving, and investment, and promote taxavoidance and tax evasion. A reduction in high marginal tax rates would boost long termeconomic growth, and reduce the attractiveness of tax shelters and other forms of tax avoidance.The economic benefits of ERTA were summarized by President Clinton's Council of EconomicAdvisers in 1994: "It is undeniable that the sharp reduction in taxes in the early 1980s was astrong impetus to economic growth." Unfortunately, the Council could not bring itself toacknowledge the counterproductive effects high marginal tax rates can have upon taxpayerbehavior and tax avoidance activities. Since 1984 the JEC has provided factual information about the impact of the tax cuts of the1980s. For example, for many years the JEC has published IRS data on federal tax payments ofthe top 1 percent, top 5 percent, top 10 percent, and other taxpayers. These data show that afterthe high marginal tax rates of 1981 were cut, tax payments and the share of the tax burden borneby the top 1 percent climbed sharply. For example, in 1981 the top 1 percent paid 17.6 percent ofall personal income taxes, but by 1988 their share had jumped to 27.5 percent, a 10 percentagepoint increase. The graph below illustrates changes in the tax burden during this period.