And your statement was dead wrong.
This is why you're not a good poster and seem kind of desperate for anyone to talk to.
You know NOTHING about how the law is actually implemented and like all good democrats you think what you know are facts. They're not and as I said before, they're wrong.
Learn something, for a change, CO means conscientious objection:
In relation to the second question, drawing on moral considerations and an analysis of policy surrounding CO to military service, we have argued that conscientious objectors have two obligations when their objection prevents them from discharging a duty to contribute to the public good.
These are an obligation to demonstrate the sincerity of their objection, and an obligation to make a commensurate contribution to society. Imposing a requirement to discharge some other duty will in many cases function as a demonstration of sincerity, thus meeting both obligations and enabling policy to side‐step difficulties relating to the verification of sincerity.
We have argued that in the case of vaccination, though a commensurate contribution to one's society is not available, objectors could discharge this duty by making a financial contribution to the state (either via a penalty or lack of access to a benefit) that reflects the degree of risk imposed on the community by their objection. As degree of risk includes the severity of potential harms, and their probability, calculation of the risk involved in not vaccinating will make reference to the existing levels of vaccine coverage in the relevant community. On such a system, the financial contribution required of non‐vaccinators will increase as overall vaccine coverage lowers. When the risk of contagion is very significant and the disease is sufficiently severe, this system would have to imply a financial compensation which is too burdensome for almost anyone to be met.
Conscientious Objection to Vaccination - PMC
Scroll heap for you. You can lead a horse to water...........