An outrage

[saved]

Thanks to this current administration
Report: Fort Hood shooter has drawn $278G in salary since massacre | Fox News

 

[salem.hills]

Yeah why is he even alive still? Obama that's why Obama said its workplace violence come on terrorism ended LMFAO

 

[Spoonman]

damn, he makes a good buck

 

[g5000]

Monthly pay chart:

Hasan joined the Army in 1988. He served nine years as an enlisted man before becoming an officer. So he is pulling down $7283.70/month.

 

[Spoonman]

Monthly pay chart:

Hasan joined the Army in 1988. He served nine years as an enlisted man before becoming an officer. So he is pulling down $7283.70/month.

he should be pulling down his pants to a cellmate named bubba

 

[pinqy]

Thanks to this current administration
Report: Fort Hood shooter has drawn $278G in salary since massacre | Fox News

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

 

[saved]

Thanks to this current administration
Report: Fort Hood shooter has drawn $278G in salary since massacre | Fox News

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.
Not only that but some of the people who were victims have had their benefits canceled.

 

[Coyote]

Thanks to this current administration
Report: Fort Hood shooter has drawn $278G in salary since massacre | Fox News

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

And what does this administration have to do with military salaries

 

[healthmyths]

Thanks to this current administration
Report: Fort Hood shooter has drawn $278G in salary since massacre | Fox News

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

I agree. As repulsive it is .. we have to as you said he's got to be proven guilty, until then he's innocent and nothing should change that.

 

[Coyote]

Thanks to this current administration
Report: Fort Hood shooter has drawn $278G in salary since massacre | Fox News

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.
Not only that but some of the people who were victims have had their benefits canceled.

He is member of the military being tried under the military code of justice - has nothing to do with what the administration "chooses".

 

[saved]

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.
Not only that but some of the people who were victims have had their benefits canceled.

He is member of the military being tried under the military code of justice - has nothing to do with what the administration "chooses".

That is not true. The President is commander and chief and head of the military. Also the administration selects the secretary of defense and who follows administration policy. They refused to call this what it was, a terror attack and instead called it a work place incident.
Had they called it what it was and prosecuted under enemy combatant he would have lost his pay, but the secretary and the president have refused to do that.

 

[pinqy]

Thanks to this current administration
Report: Fort Hood shooter has drawn $278G in salary since massacre | Fox News

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.

No, they could not have. And what makes it an act of terror? Was Sandy Hook an act of terror? Or any other mass shooting? As far as I know, there is nothing that links him to any group or conspiracy. Nor did he plant a bomb, which is generally considered an act of terror. Nor was his target political. His motive appears that he didn't want to deploy to Afghanistan and cracked. Shouting Allahu Akbar doesn't make it a terrorist act.

 

[pinqy]

Had they called it what it was and prosecuted under enemy combatant he would have lost his pay,

No, he would not have. He still would have to have been convicted first.

 

[saved]

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.

No, they could not have. And what makes it an act of terror? Was Sandy Hook an act of terror? Or any other mass shooting? As far as I know, there is nothing that links him to any group or conspiracy. Nor did he plant a bomb, which is generally considered an act of terror. Nor was his target political. His motive appears that he didn't want to deploy to Afghanistan and cracked. Shouting Allahu Akbar doesn't make it a terrorist act.

Walk onto a military base and shout the jihad battle cry then shoot people like this man did and see if it is called an act of terror.
Soldiers hear jihad battle cry before Hood shooting | Military City | a mySA.com blog

 

[francoHFW]

Let's have a GOP dupe/ Ugly American lynch mob!

 

[Coyote]

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.

No, they could not have. And what makes it an act of terror? Was Sandy Hook an act of terror? Or any other mass shooting? As far as I know, there is nothing that links him to any group or conspiracy. Nor did he plant a bomb, which is generally considered an act of terror. Nor was his target political. His motive appears that he didn't want to deploy to Afghanistan and cracked. Shouting Allahu Akbar doesn't make it a terrorist act.

Walk onto a military base and shout the jihad battle cry then shoot people like this man did and see if it is called an act of terror.
Soldiers hear jihad battle cry before Hood shooting | Military City | a mySA.com blog

Pretty much any act of mass violence is an act of terror by that definition.

 

[ClosedCaption]

This guy musta been under to long...blaming Obama for Military Retirement Plan....Freaking Epic

 

[Connery]

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.
Not only that but some of the people who were victims have had their benefits canceled.

He is member of the military being tried under the military code of justice - has nothing to do with what the administration "chooses".

That is not true. The President is commander and chief and head of the military. Also the administration selects the secretary of defense and who follows administration policy. They refused to call this what it was, a terror attack and instead called it a work place incident.
Had they called it what it was and prosecuted under enemy combatant he would have lost his pay, but the secretary and the president have refused to do that.

The President has no say in the matter.

The UCMJ is controlling in this case and "Hasan still is receiving payment from the U.S. military because, according to a spokesman, he is still a service member .

"He is a major in the United States Army and will therefore be paid until he is no longer a major," said Lt. Col. Chris Garver. "So yes, he's still receiving payment."

According to Army records, Hasan stands to receive a check for about $6,000 every month. He is also eligible for what the Army calls an "incentive pay" that could be as much as $15,000 annually. Galligan declined to comment on how much Hasan is worth."

Fort Hood Suspect Nidal Hasan Can't Find a Bank Willing to Cash His Checks (Older article but is serves the purpose of the post)

 

[Spoonman]

i just wish we treated our seniors and the pay we owe thme through SS as well as we treat our terrorists

 

[Uncensored2008]

And what does this administration have to do with military salaries

By claiming this is "workplace violence" rather than Islamic terrorism - the most corrupt DOJ in history allows Hasan to continue to collect his salary.

OBVIOUSLY it was a terrorist attack, but the Obama administration has continually lied - allowing this travesty.