An open debate.

[Penelope]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

While it might be true that Israel has the 4th most powerful army in the world, the lives of its citizens would be continually disrupted by terror. You probably don't have family or friends in Israel, so you wouldn't be aware of them constantly going into bomb shelters. Perhaps Hamas doesn't represent an existential threat, but they would be an extreme liability in the everyday lives of Israelis.

Just because Israel rings that siren does not mean its a rocket coming. More people got hurt last summer due to accidents driving to the shelters and more sought medical care for PTSD. (the israelies). Its like the weather siren here, best to ignore it.

 

[Phoenall]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

What about the violence towards Israel
The terrorist attacks on Israel
The targeting of children by arab muslims
The blood libels
The LIES

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.


How about this as another viewpoint.

The arab muslims to stop all violence, terrorism and belligerence as they agreed to do
To sit down and talk peace and mutual borders.
To agree to banishment if they fire one more rocket
And to allow Israel to fulfil International law of 1923and have Jerusalem as their capital city.

 

[Phoenall]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

While it might be true that Israel has the 4th most powerful army in the world, the lives of its citizens would be continually disrupted by terror. You probably don't have family or friends in Israel, so you wouldn't be aware of them constantly going into bomb shelters. Perhaps Hamas doesn't represent an existential threat, but they would be an extreme liability in the everyday lives of Israelis.

Just because Israel rings that siren does not mean its a rocket coming. More people got hurt last summer due to accidents driving to the shelters and more sought medical care for PTSD. (the israelies). Its like the weather siren here, best to ignore it.

Why would they drive to a shelter when every home has one built in, shows just how much you know about the reality that is Israel.

 

[MJB12741]

And you are not willing to budge...........Nor am I..................

When neither side can come to a Peaceful compromise or agreement......................we have.................

WAR................

Well appears so, if the Pals would ignore the daily abuse and bow down and worship the gods in Israel, then perhaps they might be able to continue living like animals in a cage , but fed a little better.

Over 6 decades of trying to destroy Israel in the region...............

They caged themselves.

The Zionist encroached on their territory, what do you expect? Lay down and die, say here is our land and leave.

Israel made the mistake..................................

Of not shoving the asshats into Jordan and Syria after the entire arab world attacked them on 3 different occasions..................

If their goal is the destruction of Israel............which it is.............then they can die.............which is War...............Your starting to understand aren't you...............

You go and punch a big guy in the face.........and the next thing you see is tweetie birds.......your fault.

You would try and get rid of roaches as well wouldn't you, for fear they'd multiply and kill you. According to you, its quite alright for the Zionist to do whatever is needed to have control over the area and defend themselves, but not for the pals. Like I said the little gods of Israel had no right to be there, except given by Britain, and with the understanding that they would go slowly and not encroach on the rights of the people living there.

Talking about roaches, which life form is lower, Palestinians who kill their own offspring, or roaches who don't?

 

[montelatici]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

What about the violence towards Israel
The terrorist attacks on Israel
The targeting of children by arab muslims
The blood libels
The LIES

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.


How about this as another viewpoint.

The arab muslims to stop all violence, terrorism and belligerence as they agreed to do
To sit down and talk peace and mutual borders.
To agree to banishment if they fire one more rocket
And to allow Israel to fulfil International law of 1923and have Jerusalem as their capital city.

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.

"Israel's PM Netanyahu: No Palestinian state on my watch"

Netanyahu No Palestinian state on my watch - CNN.com

 

[Penelope]

Well appears so, if the Pals would ignore the daily abuse and bow down and worship the gods in Israel, then perhaps they might be able to continue living like animals in a cage , but fed a little better.

Over 6 decades of trying to destroy Israel in the region...............

They caged themselves.

The Zionist encroached on their territory, what do you expect? Lay down and die, say here is our land and leave.

Israel made the mistake..................................

Of not shoving the asshats into Jordan and Syria after the entire arab world attacked them on 3 different occasions..................

If their goal is the destruction of Israel............which it is.............then they can die.............which is War...............Your starting to understand aren't you...............

You go and punch a big guy in the face.........and the next thing you see is tweetie birds.......your fault.

You would try and get rid of roaches as well wouldn't you, for fear they'd multiply and kill you. According to you, its quite alright for the Zionist to do whatever is needed to have control over the area and defend themselves, but not for the pals. Like I said the little gods of Israel had no right to be there, except given by Britain, and with the understanding that they would go slowly and not encroach on the rights of the people living there.

Talking about roaches, which life form is lower, Palestinians who kill their own offspring, or roaches who don't?

That is propaganda and you know it.

 

[montelatici]

Well appears so, if the Pals would ignore the daily abuse and bow down and worship the gods in Israel, then perhaps they might be able to continue living like animals in a cage , but fed a little better.

Over 6 decades of trying to destroy Israel in the region...............

They caged themselves.

The Zionist encroached on their territory, what do you expect? Lay down and die, say here is our land and leave.

Israel made the mistake..................................

Of not shoving the asshats into Jordan and Syria after the entire arab world attacked them on 3 different occasions..................

If their goal is the destruction of Israel............which it is.............then they can die.............which is War...............Your starting to understand aren't you...............

You go and punch a big guy in the face.........and the next thing you see is tweetie birds.......your fault.

You would try and get rid of roaches as well wouldn't you, for fear they'd multiply and kill you. According to you, its quite alright for the Zionist to do whatever is needed to have control over the area and defend themselves, but not for the pals. Like I said the little gods of Israel had no right to be there, except given by Britain, and with the understanding that they would go slowly and not encroach on the rights of the people living there.

Talking about roaches, which life form is lower, Palestinians who kill their own offspring, or roaches who don't?

You are disgusting racist punk. Insulting my fellow Christians like that is typical of a **** like you.

 

[aris2chat]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

the result of threats, attack, bombings and war against Israel.

Egypt has much the same against gaza. Jordan too has restriction and closures to the WB.
Refugees can't get jobs or live outside camps or loose their benefits from the UN, have specialized kills, give up the claim of return or managed to apply for have temporary citizenship.
Gaza and the WB as a semi-autonomous state should not even have camps, not be dependent on groups like the UN. Their job should be to provide and develop jobs and homes for their people.
Israel is not the villain, never was the villain but used as a scapegoat in place of their own leadership and arab neighbors.
Gaza has unemployment for men of 40+% while around many settlement in the WB the unemployment rate of palestinians is near 0%.
Why is Israel providing more care and opportunities than their own authority? Why do so many palestinians have jobs in Israel instead of the WB or G? Why do they have better healthcare and education in Israel?

Palestinians left because they did not want to be Israelis, so why do they demand a right of return when they would not return at any time before Olso? They abandon the land they claim to have a right to but have no proof, abandoned the land for more than ten year, did not pay taxes on the land, have no deeds to the land, even those who might have lived or worked on the land are for the most part passed on. Why should those who have not been born, lived or work the land after so many year still believe they have some rights? They don't even want to be Israelis, so why this idea of return? Why are they refugees instead of resettled in the WB or G where they can be palestinians?

Only a handful were 'forced' out due to terrorism or the support of terrorist against Israel. Most, like so many refugees of today, left to seek something better or to get away from war. How many of the refugees of today think they will return to their homes or lands? Perhaps they will return to their countries but not likely to have anything as far as land or homes to claim.

Where is the realism of the situation today? How many believe Israel will ever surrender their security by giving up the highland they acquired as arab retreated or handed over to Israel in peace agreements? How many believe Israel will allow a population equal or greater to their own that have been at war with politically and physically for more than 60 yrs just walk in to Israel? They don't speak hebrew for the most part and don't want to be Israeli, but they want to 'move back'.

Gaza was handed over to the palestinians and they have not stopped trying to attack Israel from without or from within.

If the arabs don't want the palestinians, why should the Israelis? Palestinians have attacked their hosts or tried to usurp those countries and failed. Not good guests and not good neighbors.

What in the name of common sense would make anyone think Israel should or would allow hostiles move into their country?

 

[Roudy]

Over 6 decades of trying to destroy Israel in the region...............

They caged themselves.

The Zionist encroached on their territory, what do you expect? Lay down and die, say here is our land and leave.

Israel made the mistake..................................

Of not shoving the asshats into Jordan and Syria after the entire arab world attacked them on 3 different occasions..................

If their goal is the destruction of Israel............which it is.............then they can die.............which is War...............Your starting to understand aren't you...............

You go and punch a big guy in the face.........and the next thing you see is tweetie birds.......your fault.

You would try and get rid of roaches as well wouldn't you, for fear they'd multiply and kill you. According to you, its quite alright for the Zionist to do whatever is needed to have control over the area and defend themselves, but not for the pals. Like I said the little gods of Israel had no right to be there, except given by Britain, and with the understanding that they would go slowly and not encroach on the rights of the people living there.

Talking about roaches, which life form is lower, Palestinians who kill their own offspring, or roaches who don't?

You are disgusting racist punk. Insulting my fellow Christians like that is typical of a **** like you.

Ha ha ha. "Christians". And yet you have nothing to say about the 150,000 Lebanese Christians killed by Palestinian Muslims.

Shove your phony concern for up your Mecca.

 

[Roudy]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

What about the violence towards Israel
The terrorist attacks on Israel
The targeting of children by arab muslims
The blood libels
The LIES

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.


How about this as another viewpoint.

The arab muslims to stop all violence, terrorism and belligerence as they agreed to do
To sit down and talk peace and mutual borders.
To agree to banishment if they fire one more rocket
And to allow Israel to fulfil International law of 1923and have Jerusalem as their capital city.

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.

"Israel's PM Netanyahu: No Palestinian state on my watch"

Netanyahu No Palestinian state on my watch - CNN.com

That's right.

No Palestinian state to be used as a vehicle to destroy the Jewish state. Never gonna happen.

 

[Lipush]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

Let me answer that, then, as an Israeli.

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?

The oppression in Gaza is all under responsibility of Gaza. When the IDF left the area known as Gush Katif, expelling thousands of Jews from their homes in the process, it left a vaccum in Gaza. It was their choice of how to fill it. They could have filled it with good leadership, instead, they chose terrorism. And what you do with terrorists, you press them till they cry out. Saddest thing is, they keep women and children in that mess where they cannot escape.

Regardless of the occupied territories?

"Occupied territories" is a complete different issue from the issue of the Gaza strip, there is no point mixing apples and oranges.

Regardless of the restrictions of movement?

"Restriction of movements" is a way of dealing with Palestinian terrorism.

Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?

The Palestinian state they want to establish on the rubbles and bodies of defeated Jews. Gee, wonder why we are not in favor.

Regardless of incursions into Gaza?

"Incursions" come, 99% of the time (although liars and propagandists will say otherwise) as a direct reactions to rocket firing. Those are justified most of the time.

Regardless of illegal settlements?

You asked that already in a different version.

And on, and on, and on....

Yada yada yada

 

[Lipush]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

While it might be true that Israel has the 4th most powerful army in the world, the lives of its citizens would be continually disrupted by terror. You probably don't have family or friends in Israel, so you wouldn't be aware of them constantly going into bomb shelters. Perhaps Hamas doesn't represent an existential threat, but they would be an extreme liability in the everyday lives of Israelis.

Just because Israel rings that siren does not mean its a rocket coming. More people got hurt last summer due to accidents driving to the shelters and more sought medical care for PTSD. (the israelies). Its like the weather siren here, best to ignore it.

And here again, Penelope proves her lack of knowledge by pretending she knows it all.

STFU, will you? you're tiring.

 

[Phoenall]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

What about the violence towards Israel
The terrorist attacks on Israel
The targeting of children by arab muslims
The blood libels
The LIES

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.


How about this as another viewpoint.

The arab muslims to stop all violence, terrorism and belligerence as they agreed to do
To sit down and talk peace and mutual borders.
To agree to banishment if they fire one more rocket
And to allow Israel to fulfil International law of 1923and have Jerusalem as their capital city.

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.

"Israel's PM Netanyahu: No Palestinian state on my watch"

Netanyahu No Palestinian state on my watch - CNN.com

396 Palestinian National Council political statement and declaration of independence- 14 November 1988


The session culminated in the announcement of the rise of the Palestinian state in our Palestinian land



Now where in this does it say that Israel has stopped Palestine from being a state. You see Israeli's cant stop the Palestinians from taking the next step and declaring their free determination, but the P.A. can and do.

 

[Phoenall]

Over 6 decades of trying to destroy Israel in the region...............

They caged themselves.

The Zionist encroached on their territory, what do you expect? Lay down and die, say here is our land and leave.

Israel made the mistake..................................

Of not shoving the asshats into Jordan and Syria after the entire arab world attacked them on 3 different occasions..................

If their goal is the destruction of Israel............which it is.............then they can die.............which is War...............Your starting to understand aren't you...............

You go and punch a big guy in the face.........and the next thing you see is tweetie birds.......your fault.

You would try and get rid of roaches as well wouldn't you, for fear they'd multiply and kill you. According to you, its quite alright for the Zionist to do whatever is needed to have control over the area and defend themselves, but not for the pals. Like I said the little gods of Israel had no right to be there, except given by Britain, and with the understanding that they would go slowly and not encroach on the rights of the people living there.

Talking about roaches, which life form is lower, Palestinians who kill their own offspring, or roaches who don't?

That is propaganda and you know it.

No it is proven fact

 

[Humanity]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

What about the violence towards Israel
The terrorist attacks on Israel
The targeting of children by arab muslims
The blood libels
The LIES

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.


How about this as another viewpoint.

The arab muslims to stop all violence, terrorism and belligerence as they agreed to do
To sit down and talk peace and mutual borders.
To agree to banishment if they fire one more rocket
And to allow Israel to fulfil International law of 1923and have Jerusalem as their capital city.

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.

"Israel's PM Netanyahu: No Palestinian state on my watch"

Netanyahu No Palestinian state on my watch - CNN.com

396 Palestinian National Council political statement and declaration of independence- 14 November 1988


The session culminated in the announcement of the rise of the Palestinian state in our Palestinian land



Now where in this does it say that Israel has stopped Palestine from being a state. You see Israeli's cant stop the Palestinians from taking the next step and declaring their free determination, but the P.A. can and do.

If, as you clearly suggest, Israel has no power to stop a Palestinian state would this happen...?

Israel's PM Netanyahu: "No Palestinian state on my watch"

 

[Phoenall]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

What about the violence towards Israel
The terrorist attacks on Israel
The targeting of children by arab muslims
The blood libels
The LIES

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.


How about this as another viewpoint.

The arab muslims to stop all violence, terrorism and belligerence as they agreed to do
To sit down and talk peace and mutual borders.
To agree to banishment if they fire one more rocket
And to allow Israel to fulfil International law of 1923and have Jerusalem as their capital city.

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.

"Israel's PM Netanyahu: No Palestinian state on my watch"

Netanyahu No Palestinian state on my watch - CNN.com

396 Palestinian National Council political statement and declaration of independence- 14 November 1988


The session culminated in the announcement of the rise of the Palestinian state in our Palestinian land



Now where in this does it say that Israel has stopped Palestine from being a state. You see Israeli's cant stop the Palestinians from taking the next step and declaring their free determination, but the P.A. can and do.

If, as you clearly suggest, Israel has no power to stop a Palestinian state would this happen...?

Israel's PM Netanyahu: "No Palestinian state on my watch"

A statement taken out of context, and truncated to meet with the islamonazi POV. The real words have been shown on here many times and still you post the LIE.

 

[Daniyel]

Hello,

I'd like to ask all those supporting the Palestinian cause regardless of their general position about certain situations, Do you support rocket fire against Israel?

Thanks in advance.

I think you needed to word your question differently!

You cannot ask the question and then preface it with "regardless of their general position about certain situations"...

Regardless of the oppression and blockade of Gaza?
Regardless of the occupied territories?
Regardless of the restrictions of movement?
Regardless of the resistance of Israel to allow a Palestinian state?
Regardless of incursions into Gaza?
Regardless of illegal settlements?
And on, and on, and on....

You cannot just take "rocket fire" in isolation.... It could be considered a retaliation, a reaction to an action...

I do not support violence in any form so, in isolation, my answer to your question has to be "No"!

As I have said many times before...

Israel must take steps, as the 'occupying power', as the 'stronger force', to start taking steps to remove the blockade, to allow the Palestinians to 'feel' that they can make steps to creating a Palestinian state...

To preempt your 'security of Israel' response...

Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world... You cannot seriously believe that Hamas can trouble Israel with attacks? Using this argument for not lifting blockades etc etc is a pretty lame one these days...

Here's a view point for you....

Lift the blockades, start removing the illegal settlers and then, should rocket fire continue, Israel should REQUEST that a 3rd party, a military 'peace keeping' force, enter Gaza in an attempt to quash the terrorist activities within.

What about the violence towards Israel
The terrorist attacks on Israel
The targeting of children by arab muslims
The blood libels
The LIES

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.


How about this as another viewpoint.

The arab muslims to stop all violence, terrorism and belligerence as they agreed to do
To sit down and talk peace and mutual borders.
To agree to banishment if they fire one more rocket
And to allow Israel to fulfil International law of 1923and have Jerusalem as their capital city.

Now how about a link to this 4th largest military, and while you are at it a link to Israel stopping the arab muslims from having a state.

"Israel's PM Netanyahu: No Palestinian state on my watch"

Netanyahu No Palestinian state on my watch - CNN.com

396 Palestinian National Council political statement and declaration of independence- 14 November 1988


The session culminated in the announcement of the rise of the Palestinian state in our Palestinian land



Now where in this does it say that Israel has stopped Palestine from being a state. You see Israeli's cant stop the Palestinians from taking the next step and declaring their free determination, but the P.A. can and do.

If, as you clearly suggest, Israel has no power to stop a Palestinian state would this happen...?

Israel's PM Netanyahu: "No Palestinian state on my watch"

So you suggest Bibi back off from this statement is a lie but the first statement isn't?
I'm not sure who I was talking to but I've already explained what a brilliant political maneuver it was..Apologies for the lazy attitude but you can find the post in my post history search.

 

[Penelope]

Jews do not know what a lie is.

 

[Phoenall]

Jews do not know what a lie is.

They do as they see and hear them every day from muslims and their stooges

 

[Coyote]

No.

It gains the Palestinians nothing and Israel has a right to defend itself.