An argument that has come and gone for as long as I have been on message boards. There is merit to each side of the argument.
On one side, you always have some that you know by their posts accept the responsibility that goes with free speech arguing against any restriction. The flaw to their argument are the people who see an internet message board as a way to act like complete asses without being held accountable for their actions. Nothing REAL is going to happen to them. They get banned and move on. In the meantime, they've left a pile of shit in our sandbox.
On the other side, you have those that want speech restricted to only that which they agree with and label everything else "trolling" and ban-able.
Ones who see message boards which are owned by for-profit companies or private individuals as "free speech zones" don't know the first flippin thing about our Constitution. One would suppose they would not only invite me into their home, but they would have no problem with me smearing my shit on their walls, pissing on their carpet, ******* their wife and kicking their dog.... Drinking all their beer, and kicking holes in their walls. All because I have "free speech."
This is how stupid the "free speech" argument on message boards is.