Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How?!! The JUDGE WAS BLACK?!!?!?!??!None!! It was a black judge. How do you explain that? What world do you live in? I hire a black judge and you still don’t like the verdict. What else can I do?!!That’s crazy. She is a cop and he is a civilian. He is a dude and she is a gal. Those factors matter.The question was if Botham Jean had killed Amber Guyger in her apartment...would have have gotten 10 years.HOW!!!???? The judge was African American!?!?!?!?!?!?So if they have the same EXACT rights as I do then there is no systemic racism.You are giving me one off examples. We have 330 million people in the US. In terms of Breona Taylor, she was used as a human shield by her boyfriend, who fired first.Nope. Answer my question. If you’re a black woman or man, what can you not legally do that I can?Ever heard the name Brian Encina?It was one cop. And all agreed he was bad. When a black man commits a crime. I do not blame all black men for it. When Anthony Wiener sends his junk to women I dont condemn all politicians for it.What "real world grievances"? LMAO!!!I'm a proud conservative. That comes with both political and social views, although not all cliche and not all at any sort of widespread intensity.
As a Conservative, you bet I back the police. I believe in individual responsibility. These few hundred immoral monsters committed an act of domestic terrorism, costing multiple lives lost, including one of their own from defensive fire. The rioters are being arrested and will likely receive absolutely no assistance (nor should they), and get lengthy prison time. I consider it a dark day for America, but one among MANY that have happened recently.
Also as a Conservative, I was outraged by previous riots that were far more massive and happened all across the country throughout 2020, causing hundreds of millions of dollars, burning down so many citizens' livelihoods, sending hundreds of police officers to the hospital with cracked skulls from bricks, and killing 40+ people across the country. Multiple government buildings were seized or burned, police were withdrawn so that citizens were left to fend for themselves. Again... let that sink in... police left their citizens to the mob to let them fend for themselves. Yet, the rioters were rationalized, their criminal acts overlooked and blamed on a system. They were bailed out of jail by the likes of Kamala Harris, Joe Biden's team, and other prominent Democrats.
I notice, observably and unbiasedly, that the MSM rationalized and/or supported the BLM riots, but now depict this specific riot as worse than Pearl Harbor. I notice that the Democrats were radio silent during the BLM riots, but now are powerfully condemning these riots.
I see this. We all see this. It is an objective, provable double standard. And thus when, as a Conservative, I'm lectured about how I have to own these horrible people who I condemn, yet BLM rioters who committed the same or far greater atrocities were just in their criminality???
I don't buy it, and I call politics. Conservatives, by and large, denounce all riots. We, in Conservatism, are glad to have Democrats and leftists finally condemning political violence in America. We simply wonder what took you so long to do it, and look forward to your consistency when people of any color commit immoral criminal acts in America.
This is true unification.
BLM rioted over real world grievances. The violence was wrong, the looting was wrong. And those took part should have been arrested with upgraded charges. I said so at the time.
The right wing rioted over a myth. The violence was wrong, the looting was wrong. And those that took part should be arrested with upgraded charges.
Systemic racism is a myth.
Cops who kneel on the necks of black men for 8 minutes isn't a myth.
Systemic racism does exist as well.
Really? What rights do I have that a black man or woman does not? What can I legally do that a black man or woman cannot? Do tell.
He is the one who grabbed Sandra Bland out of her car which eventually lead to her death in the Waller County jail.
Johnathan Mattingly? Ever heard of him? He's the cop who shot Breona Taylor.
Michael Slager? He is the guy who shot Walter Scott in the back while "fearing for his life".
View attachment 441806
Botham Jean?
He was murdered by an off duty Dallas Police officer in his own home. His crime? Being in the apartment the off duty cop thought was hers. She got a whopping 10 years for killing an unarmed black man in his own home. Had the DA charged her with B&E, she probably would have gotten a stiffer sentence for that rather than the 10 spot on a fucking MURDER CONVICTION she did get
Can they not do things that we can? No...they actually get to do things we can't. They get to live in fear of overzealous policing and a court system that doesn't give two shits about it.
In terms of Botham Jean the judge was African American.
Again what can a black man and or woman legally not do in America that I can?
Botham Jean's murderer got 10 years.
Please tell us that you honestly believe that Botham Jean would have gotten 10 years for killing Amber Guyger if the roles had been reversed.
You arent answering my question. The judge was African American. Her apartment was directly above his. Hallways look identical. Jury gave her 10 years and judge who is again African American didn't overturn it. His brother forgave her. Now will you answer my question or keep dodging it?
Again what can a black man and or woman legally not do in America that I can?
Racism isn't codified by statute....so no...there is nothing that a black man or woman can't do.
Your turn...
Do you honestly believe a black man would have gotten 10 years for murdering an unarmed white woman--shooting her dead--in her own home?
Simple question. I'm sure you have your tap shoes on already. Start dancing.
This is the DEFINITION of racism: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.
You just admitted that there is nothing that a black man or woman can't do that I can do in America.
Case Closed
To answer your question:
If it were a black woman who was a police officer and he was a white male then YES. It would have been the same sentence. Maybe even more lenient. If Amber were a man then the sentence would have been more than 10 years.
Racism isn't codified...but as the Guyger verdict points out...it's alive and well in our system.
I hope you stretched before you started your tap dance there...so predictable.
You leftists are crazy. Tap dance?
I replaced white female cop with black female cop and black male victim to white male victim? You are a very stupid person. And a leftist. Tell me again, where am I dancing. You are the one dancing as I proved you wrong.
Wow...and race would play no factor in the verdict...right? That is the world you live in. unbelievable.
What else can you do?
Admit that the white woman got favorable treatment and that blacks have a genuine grievance because she did.
So HOW DO YOU FIX THAT GRIEVANCE?!!?!?!?
Harsh standards in your little book for murder convictions would be a good start. Oh, wait, I see...you think all blacks think the same because they have the same skin color. I forgot...I was talking to a Trump supporter. I should have just assumed you had some learning disability.
Botham Jean would be on death row at this moment if he had killed Amber Guyger under the same circumstance. You know it, I know it, everyone with two working brain cells knows it.
Whoa whoa.. care to prove this?Those protests were often made violent by, that's right, people who call themselves "conservatives" killing police and burning buildings and other acts of provocation.
Try your lies elsewhere idiot.Whoa whoa.. care to prove this?Those protests were often made violent by, that's right, people who call themselves "conservatives" killing police and burning buildings and other acts of provocation.
So BLM and ANTIFA rioters chose to commit all the widespread crime they did because Conservatives MADE Them do it? LMAO
It seems no amount of BLM condemnation from the left would be enough for a Magaturd. Which is why the rest of sane America stopped giving any fucks about their grievances.Not a single one of those Dimwingers condemned them. All they did was try to put some distance between them by claiming "That's not us, it's them".
Post fail, hack.
There is no condemnation of BLM from the left.It seems no amount of BLM condemnation from the left would be enough for a Magaturd. Which is why the rest of sane America stopped giving any fucks about their grievances.
Dems are socialist/communist now----socialists and communists use roving gangs of criminals,thugs,druggies,violent college kids in order create chaos and disorder as a means to gain power and control of their intended victim nation...hence why the anti fa and blm are dems/soros groups and why the dems/soros prosecutors and cities are allowing them to terrorize everyone else.Democrats hate all rioting thugs regardless of political affiliation. Politics & policy is what the elections & protest are for. But riots & violent mobs are an act of war! The traitorous thugs must be put down hard or democracy is finished!
I disagree.There is no condemnation of BLM from the left.
Yes...I read the news.
Yes...You don't read the news.
Magaturds don't condemn their own either. Guess that would make you just as big a hypocrite as the left, no?
You lie a lot.I disagree.
In other words, ya got nothin'.You lie a lot.
All your ad hominems prove is that you have the mentality of a 2 year old.
How wickedly predictable.
All your ad hominems prove is that you have the mentality of a 2 year old.In other words, ya got nothin'.
What ad hominems?All your ad hominems prove is that you have the mentality of a 2 year old.
I forgot that ad hominem is a phrase that you learn when you reach the age of 3.What ad hominems?
Does the word magaturd trigger you? Are you self identifying?I forgot that ad hominem is a phrase that you learn when you reach the age of 3.
No, age 3 is when you start learning reading comprehension. Here I’ll give you a lesson. When somebody asks “what ad hominem?” They are asking for the quote or example of what the person was referring too. They are not asking what “ad hominem” means. Get it?I forgot that ad hominem is a phrase that you learn when you reach the age of 3.
No, I really don't think it does.No, age 3 is when you start learning reading comprehension. Here I’ll give you a lesson. When somebody asks “what ad hominem?” They are asking for the quote or example of what the person was referring too. They are not asking what “ad hominem” means. Get it?
Someone who only posts insults and needs me to inform them of such, they are obviously either mentally ill or on the web without adult supervision.No, age 3 is when you start learning reading comprehension. Here I’ll give you a lesson. When somebody asks “what ad hominem?” They are asking for the quote or example of what the person was referring too. They are not asking what “ad hominem” means. Get it?
Your existence confuses me.Does the word magaturd trigger you? Are you self identifying?
What insult do you perceive I posted?Someone who only posts insults and needs me to inform them of such, they are obviously either mentally ill or on the web without adult supervision.
I will not be pleasing you tonight or any other night.What insult do you perceive I posted?
Damn, so little effort required to topple the whole house of cards of your ignorance.I will not be pleasing you tonight or any other night.
In fact, you are so pathetic that I welcome you to Ignore.
Bye, Felicia.
