The US has the highest corporate tax rate in the world:
AEI - Report Card on Effective Corporate Tax Rates
Plus, companies have State taxes and when applicable, city taxes. In China and Japan for example, corporations pay their Government tax and that's it!
As an individual I pay Federal, State and City taxes and that aint good either, but I guess that comes under the Liberal idea of "everyone must pay their fair share" and "shared sacrifice". Thanks Leftwing Deluded Morons!
Everyone knows the 35% rate has more loopholes than any single tax law in existence. It's like the income tax, which income the truly wealthy don't earn their living on. They pay 15% on capital gains. Income is for schlubs who can't afford to buy politicians.
General Electric Paid No Federal Taxes in 2010 - ABC News
Study history.
During the postwar years the US had significantly higher tax rates, and the economy saw its highest, most sustained growth. The high tax rate was used to shore up middle class demand so that consumers had sufficient financial security to spend money and drive the economy. It worked perfectly. The more money in middle class pockets, the more the capitalist has to add jobs/innovation in order to capture that money. Today, after 30 years of defunding the middle class, the capitalist has no incentive to add jobs. Why? The middle class does not have sufficient money to spend - their programs, wages, and benefits have been cut. Essentially, American capital paid to bring the no-benefit, no-entitlement 3rd world labor model to America. Problem is: America's domestic economy cannot function with 3rd world consumers. The American economy is built from MASSIVE middle class demand.
The Reagan Model - which ends government investment in the middle class in favor of subsidies and tax cuts for the wealthy - has destroyed the middle class consumer, who ultimately required unsustainable levels of credit to maintain consumption. Now, without the credit, there is nothing to drive consumption. There is no reason to add jobs
Higher tax rates seem to work quite well, if done properly
During the Clinton years, tax rates were higher and the economy boomed. Bush inherited a surplus, than he instituted the largest tax cuts in American history and the economy has been in crisis ever since. In fact, the Busies needed to dump massive liquidity on the housing market to make up for the revenue shortfall. This turned into a disaster.
Son, you've been lied to by your party. Let me explain their plan.
Reagan created a very specific strategy called "Starve the best". His theory, promoted by Milton Friedman, was this: if you deny government revenue; if you force it into a revenue crisis, spending will decrease. Reagan learned that his theory was a fallacy, especially because he didn't want to cut spending: for every dollar he took from education he put $100 into idiotic programs like "Star Wars". That is, Reagan actually grew spending , exploded the debt, and grew the size of the federal government over Carter by an embarrassing degree. The reason you don't know this is because your media source don't tell you.
Little known fact about Reagan's "Starve the Beast"
When Ronnie realized that his original tax cuts sent the economy into crisis (by exploding government deficits and debt), he increased taxes. He limited the crisis from growing into a disaster.
Enter Bush 41. "Starve the Beast" on steroids
Bush 41 decided that he would do what Reagan refused to do: create such an extreme revenue shortfall that Federal and State governments would be thrust into a terrible crisis. He amplified the crisis with the help a GOP Congress: together they spent more than any group in history to that date. They bankrupted government beyond anything ever seen -- but they did this not in response to a once in a century meltdown; they did it after they had been handed a surplus; after they had proof that the Clinton tax rates worked to create a powerful economy where debt and deficits could be controlled, but capital had sufficient incentive and demand to invest in the economy. They created an artificial disaster to defund the middle class and lower labor costs. Everyone knows a prosperous, upwardly mobile middle class brings much higher labor costs to any supply chain. This is why American capital prefers 3rd world sweat shops. This is why Nikes are made for 20 cents in countries which brutally repress their workers and citizens. Capital represses whatever population it operates in because disenfranchised slave labor boosts profit margins.
Rather than blame "Starve the Beast" for the crisis - rather than blame the very thing that was specifically designed to cause the disaster -- they blamed the tax and legislative policies which created the postwar middle class, and lead to the most powerful demand-centered consumption economy in history. As I have said, the revenue crisis of the Bush tax cuts was used as a tool to transfer broad investment in the middle class to narrow corporate pockets.
Here is the problem. They created a financial disaster that has destroyed the country beyond anybody's worst imagination.