Americans make it clear: Noncitizens should not vote in U.S. elections

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
24,686
Reaction score
49,058
Points
2,290
We need to protect the Citizens rights, not the non-citizens. Or citizenship doesn't mean anything, except being a slave to the DC swamp.




Polling has shown that a large majority of Americans oppose allowing non-U.S. citizens to vote in elections.

On Election Day, voters backed up that sentiment.

Eight states had citizen-only voting initiatives on their ballots Nov. 5. These initiatives passed by wide margins in each state.

Separately, a measure in Santa Ana, California, that would have opened the door for non-citizens to vote in citywide elections was soundly defeated.

"Voters in eight states sent a very clear and unmistakable message: Only citizens should vote," Paul Jacob, a board member at Americans for Citizen Voting, said. "Every ballot measure passed by whopping margins."

In Iowa, 76% of voters said noncitizens should not be able to vote. In Idaho, 65% did. The same is true in Kentucky (62%), Missouri (68%), North Carolina (77.6%), Oklahoma (81%), South Carolina (86%) and Wisconsin (70%), as The Center Square previously reported.

In Santa Ana, California, voters rejected Measure DD with 62.5% of voters opposing the initiative that would have allowed the city to adopt an ordinance allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections.

...


 
We need to protect the Citizens rights, not the non-citizens. Or citizenship doesn't mean anything, except being a slave to the DC swamp.



Polling has shown that a large majority of Americans oppose allowing non-U.S. citizens to vote in elections.
On Election Day, voters backed up that sentiment.
Eight states had citizen-only voting initiatives on their ballots Nov. 5. These initiatives passed by wide margins in each state.
Separately, a measure in Santa Ana, California, that would have opened the door for non-citizens to vote in citywide elections was soundly defeated.
"Voters in eight states sent a very clear and unmistakable message: Only citizens should vote," Paul Jacob, a board member at Americans for Citizen Voting, said. "Every ballot measure passed by whopping margins."
In Iowa, 76% of voters said noncitizens should not be able to vote. In Idaho, 65% did. The same is true in Kentucky (62%), Missouri (68%), North Carolina (77.6%), Oklahoma (81%), South Carolina (86%) and Wisconsin (70%), as The Center Square previously reported.
In Santa Ana, California, voters rejected Measure DD with 62.5% of voters opposing the initiative that would have allowed the city to adopt an ordinance allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections.
...



That's what kept the democrats from losing 50 House seats this cycle
 
We need to protect the Citizens rights, not the non-citizens. Or citizenship doesn't mean anything, except being a slave to the DC swamp.



Polling has shown that a large majority of Americans oppose allowing non-U.S. citizens to vote in elections.
On Election Day, voters backed up that sentiment.
Eight states had citizen-only voting initiatives on their ballots Nov. 5. These initiatives passed by wide margins in each state.
Separately, a measure in Santa Ana, California, that would have opened the door for non-citizens to vote in citywide elections was soundly defeated.
"Voters in eight states sent a very clear and unmistakable message: Only citizens should vote," Paul Jacob, a board member at Americans for Citizen Voting, said. "Every ballot measure passed by whopping margins."
In Iowa, 76% of voters said noncitizens should not be able to vote. In Idaho, 65% did. The same is true in Kentucky (62%), Missouri (68%), North Carolina (77.6%), Oklahoma (81%), South Carolina (86%) and Wisconsin (70%), as The Center Square previously reported.
In Santa Ana, California, voters rejected Measure DD with 62.5% of voters opposing the initiative that would have allowed the city to adopt an ordinance allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections.
...


They don't. Except in a few local cases of school boards where they have children in the system.
Otherwise, this doesn't happen. There are laws on the books preventing this from happening.

A complete non-issue.
 
They don't. Except in a few local cases of school boards where they have children in the system.
Otherwise, this doesn't happen. There are laws on the books preventing this from happening.

A complete non-issue.
If it's a non-issue, then it shouldn't be an issue to enforce identification and proof-of-citizenship at the polling place. right?
 
LOL. That already happens. You don't get to make the rules because of your belief in conspiracy theories. That's not how it works.
It's not a conspiracy theory -- in many states, you are not required to show identification before voting, and leading up to the 2024 election, there were several states that had 'glitches' in the driver's license registration process of capturing proof of citizenship. Arizona is a great example with over 200K 'glitches,' and the State Supreme Court allowed them to vote anyway.
 
It's not a conspiracy theory -- in many states, you are not required to show identification before voting, and leading up to the 2024 election, there were several states that had 'glitches' in the driver's license registration process of capturing proof of citizenship. Arizona is a great example with over 200K 'glitches,' and the State Supreme Court allowed them to vote anyway.
It's a conspiracy theory. It doesn't happen. Your use of the word "glitch" gives it away. It gives you an out.
 
Illegals should not vote in national elections.

State elections are up to the states.
 
We need to protect the Citizens rights, not the non-citizens. Or citizenship doesn't mean anything, except being a slave to the DC swamp.



Polling has shown that a large majority of Americans oppose allowing non-U.S. citizens to vote in elections.
On Election Day, voters backed up that sentiment.
Eight states had citizen-only voting initiatives on their ballots Nov. 5. These initiatives passed by wide margins in each state.
Separately, a measure in Santa Ana, California, that would have opened the door for non-citizens to vote in citywide elections was soundly defeated.
"Voters in eight states sent a very clear and unmistakable message: Only citizens should vote," Paul Jacob, a board member at Americans for Citizen Voting, said. "Every ballot measure passed by whopping margins."
In Iowa, 76% of voters said noncitizens should not be able to vote. In Idaho, 65% did. The same is true in Kentucky (62%), Missouri (68%), North Carolina (77.6%), Oklahoma (81%), South Carolina (86%) and Wisconsin (70%), as The Center Square previously reported.
In Santa Ana, California, voters rejected Measure DD with 62.5% of voters opposing the initiative that would have allowed the city to adopt an ordinance allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections.
...


Nobody ever claimed they should be.

That's 100% RWNJ propaganda.
 
Nobody ever claimed they should be.

That's 100% RWNJ propaganda.

O'really?


Majority of House Democrats support noncitizens voting​




House Democrats encouraged to oppose bill banning non-citizens from voting​


Yea, total propaganda. Yea right. DUMBFUCK.

And also, not checking ID's ensures that nobody will stop an illegal from voting. Nobody knows who the fuck they are.
 
Last edited:
O'really?


Majority of House Democrats support noncitizens voting​




House Democrats encouraged to oppose bill banning non-citizens from voting​


Yea, total propaganda. Yea right. DUMBFUCK.

And also, not checking ID's ensures that nobody will stop an illegal from voting. Nobody knows who the fuck they are.
Lol, no. Just no.

You can't cite lying propaganda sources as proof.
 
Why would anyone not want to secure elections more?

democrats fight it tooth and nail.

The only reason you’d fight it is because as a party you have a strong Ground game of cheating, and want it to continue

Why else?

It’s like saying “well, there’s not a TON of murder, so we’ll just stop trying to advance public safety”
 
We had the most secure elections ever, Mr. Friscus, despite all the MAGA attempted interference.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom