so, are you a professional idiot? did you even read the OP? It is quite obvious to the most dense (or so I thought) what I was arguing.
I compared the old South, the Confederacy, to al-qaeda. The comparison took the form of the amount of Americans killed in a single day -- cause -- the hostilities each initiated against the United States.
Al-Qaeda and the Confederacy, both declared war on the United States. what do you not get about those facts?
That is an analogy you dumbfuck.
analogy 1 : inference that
if two or more things agree with one another in some respects
they will probably agree in others
--
you are drawing the analogy, not my argument in the OP. see?
the comparison: number of Americans killed in one day, by 2 different enemies of the United States.
fact: Al-Qaeda and the Confederacy both declared war on the United States.
fact: the Confederacy and Al-Qaeda are/were both enemies of the United states
fact: Some Americans fly the Confederate flag
argument it is a traitorous act for an American to proudly fly the flag of an enemy of the United States who has killed American citizens.
----------------
where is the analogy? come on. you can do it if you try hard enough. where is the analogy you say I am making where the comparison is drawn? we know what the two things that agree with one another in some respects are (2 enemies killed Americans). where is/are the one or another ways, in which my argument suggests they will agree?