Americans Are Increasingly Angry And They Want Trump

[NightFox]

Grow in the right places by cutting the budget in the wrong places

Entitlements

-Geaux

...and all this time I thought conservatives wanted smaller government when in fact they just wanted a government with bigger tits.

Who knew?

 

[Geaux4it]

Grow in the right places by cutting the budget in the wrong places

Entitlements

-Geaux

...and all this time I thought conservatives wanted smaller government when in fact they just wanted a government with bigger tits.

Who knew?

I do, that is why I'm bitching about Credit Card reform duh

We are against fiscal growth.

Cut the budget to pay for investments in our best interest

-Geaux

 

[NightFox]

Grow in the right places by cutting the budget in the wrong places

Entitlements

-Geaux

...and all this time I thought conservatives wanted smaller government when in fact they just wanted a government with bigger tits.

Who knew?

I do, that is why I'm bitching about Credit Card reform duh

We are against fiscal growth.

Cut the budget to pay for investments in our best interest

-Geaux

Uh-huh.. so if I got this straight, you want to "cut the budget" so their will be more money for the government to blow on other bullshit? and how does that shrink government exactly?

"Lucy you got some 'xplainin' to do"

 

[Geaux4it]

Grow in the right places by cutting the budget in the wrong places

Entitlements

-Geaux

...and all this time I thought conservatives wanted smaller government when in fact they just wanted a government with bigger tits.

Who knew?

I do, that is why I'm bitching about Credit Card reform duh

We are against fiscal growth.

Cut the budget to pay for investments in our best interest

-Geaux

Uh-huh.. so if I got this straight, you want to "cut the budget" so their will be more money for the government to blow on other bullshit? and how does that shrink government exactly?

"Lucy you got some 'xplainin' to do"

My comments addressed the question in this thread that Trump wants to increase the size of Government. That is of course a flawed assumption. We depend on the government for National Security. That is one job they do well when managed effectively. Growing government equates to growing budget. To mitigate the increase, we cut elsewhere. Thus, zero sum game relative to government growth

-Geaux

 

[NightFox]

Grow in the right places by cutting the budget in the wrong places

Entitlements

-Geaux

...and all this time I thought conservatives wanted smaller government when in fact they just wanted a government with bigger tits.

Who knew?

I do, that is why I'm bitching about Credit Card reform duh

We are against fiscal growth.

Cut the budget to pay for investments in our best interest

-Geaux

Uh-huh.. so if I got this straight, you want to "cut the budget" so their will be more money for the government to blow on other bullshit? and how does that shrink government exactly?

"Lucy you got some 'xplainin' to do"

My comments addressed the question in this thread that Trump wants to increase the size of Government. That is of course a flawed assumption. We depend on the government for National Security. That is one job they do well when managed effectively. Growing government equates to growing budget. To mitigate the increase, we cut elsewhere. Thus, zero sum game relative to government growth

-Geaux

Okay... so in Trumps (and apparently your) perfect world the federal government stays the same size in terms of expenditures as it is right now? You realize that entitlements are on automatic pilot (i.e. there are mandatory spending increases built into them)? so how does the Donald plan to deal with that ? Is he just going to tell all the entitlement recipients to go **** themselves and expect Congress to go along with it? Sounds like all Donald duck is proposing is to shuffle discretionary spending around with a net effect of government spending growing at its current clip + variable increases in debt service costs as interest rates rise.

As you can see it remains rather murky how the World according to Trump leads to the stated conservative goal of reducing the size of government.

 

[Geaux4it]

Grow in the right places by cutting the budget in the wrong places

Entitlements

-Geaux

...and all this time I thought conservatives wanted smaller government when in fact they just wanted a government with bigger tits.

Who knew?

I do, that is why I'm bitching about Credit Card reform duh

We are against fiscal growth.

Cut the budget to pay for investments in our best interest

-Geaux

Uh-huh.. so if I got this straight, you want to "cut the budget" so their will be more money for the government to blow on other bullshit? and how does that shrink government exactly?

"Lucy you got some 'xplainin' to do"

My comments addressed the question in this thread that Trump wants to increase the size of Government. That is of course a flawed assumption. We depend on the government for National Security. That is one job they do well when managed effectively. Growing government equates to growing budget. To mitigate the increase, we cut elsewhere. Thus, zero sum game relative to government growth

-Geaux

Okay... so in Trumps (and apparently your) perfect world the federal government stays the same size in terms of expenditures as it is right now? You realize that entitlements are on automatic pilot (i.e. there are mandatory spending increases built into them)? so how does the Donald plan to deal with that ? Is he just going to tell all the entitlement recipients to go **** themselves and expect Congress to go along with it? Sounds like all Donald duck is proposing is to shuffle discretionary spending around with a net effect of government spending growing at its current clip + variable increases in debt service costs as interest rates rise.

As you can see it remains rather murky how the World according to Trump leads to the stated conservative goal of reducing the size of government.

Meh, we must first establish a baseline AFTER scrubbing the budget and reducing entitlements. SS in not one of them however. I propose we look into the social engineering equation relative to our budget and terminate them

Obamacare would be a good starting point

-Geaux

 

[guno]

I still am a Cruz guy. But if Trump makes the cut, he'll get my vote.

Count me as one the the disenfranchised

-Geaux
----------------

Earlier today, CNBC's Steve Liesman made two very important, in fact "critical", if about one year overdue, discoveries.

The first one was that Americans are angry.

According to the CNBC All-America Survey, a majority of Americans are angry about both the political and the economic system.

Perhaps if CNBC had discovered this sooner, it would have figured out that the reason it no longer reports its ratings to Nielsen has something to do with its underlying "rosy" slant on things, one which perhaps brings out people's, well, anger. That and the occasional informercial for Ferrari and million dollar homes.





The second discovery is that angry Americans largely support Trump over Hillary, something we have discussed since last summer.

As Liesman puts it, nearly three-fourths of the public is angry or dissatisfied with the political system in Washington, compared with 56 percent who are angry or dissatisfied about the economy. This group favors Trump on the economy over Clinton 28 percent to 21 percent.



CNBC's Steve Liesman Makes A "Discovery": Americans Are Increasingly Angry And They Want Trump | Zero Hedge

Very little difference between the two.

Conservatives are angry and they will continue to be as long as there is no Republican president.

You'll be mad for five more years

I was not happy with Clinton, but dealt with him because he knew how to walk the center of the aisle. Obama walks somewhere out around the Washington Monument

-Geaux

I was not happy with Clinton, but dealt with him because he knew how to walk the center of the aisle

Translation: At least Clinton wasn't a Black guy

Ah, the race card right on cue

-Geaux

You better get ready to be angry for a very long time , time and demographics just aren't on your side. You guys didn't learn your lesson in 2012 with all that talk about becoming an inclusive party. that lasted all of ten minutes , now you guys doubled down on keeping it the white christian party, the very group that is contracting as a percentage of the population

 

[Geaux4it]

I still am a Cruz guy. But if Trump makes the cut, he'll get my vote.

Count me as one the the disenfranchised

-Geaux
----------------

Earlier today, CNBC's Steve Liesman made two very important, in fact "critical", if about one year overdue, discoveries.

The first one was that Americans are angry.

According to the CNBC All-America Survey, a majority of Americans are angry about both the political and the economic system.

Perhaps if CNBC had discovered this sooner, it would have figured out that the reason it no longer reports its ratings to Nielsen has something to do with its underlying "rosy" slant on things, one which perhaps brings out people's, well, anger. That and the occasional informercial for Ferrari and million dollar homes.





The second discovery is that angry Americans largely support Trump over Hillary, something we have discussed since last summer.

As Liesman puts it, nearly three-fourths of the public is angry or dissatisfied with the political system in Washington, compared with 56 percent who are angry or dissatisfied about the economy. This group favors Trump on the economy over Clinton 28 percent to 21 percent.



CNBC's Steve Liesman Makes A "Discovery": Americans Are Increasingly Angry And They Want Trump | Zero Hedge

Very little difference between the two.

Conservatives are angry and they will continue to be as long as there is no Republican president.

You'll be mad for five more years

I was not happy with Clinton, but dealt with him because he knew how to walk the center of the aisle. Obama walks somewhere out around the Washington Monument

-Geaux

I was not happy with Clinton, but dealt with him because he knew how to walk the center of the aisle

Translation: At least Clinton wasn't a Black guy

Ah, the race card right on cue

-Geaux

You better get ready to be angry for a very long time , time and demographics just aren't on your side. You guys didn't learn your lesson in 2012 with all that talk about becoming an inclusive party. that lasted all of ten minutes , now you guys doubled down on keeping it the white christian party, the very group that is contracting as a percentage of the population

I am not Republican. I fired them in writing after Senator Snow sold us out. And Karl Rove can geaux **** himself

-Geaux

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Ted Cruz, a Cuban-Canadian foreigner, is trying to steals Trump 's job as POTUS....isn't it Ironic..........

 

[NightFox]

...and all this time I thought conservatives wanted smaller government when in fact they just wanted a government with bigger tits.

Who knew?

I do, that is why I'm bitching about Credit Card reform duh

We are against fiscal growth.

Cut the budget to pay for investments in our best interest

-Geaux

Uh-huh.. so if I got this straight, you want to "cut the budget" so their will be more money for the government to blow on other bullshit? and how does that shrink government exactly?

"Lucy you got some 'xplainin' to do"

My comments addressed the question in this thread that Trump wants to increase the size of Government. That is of course a flawed assumption. We depend on the government for National Security. That is one job they do well when managed effectively. Growing government equates to growing budget. To mitigate the increase, we cut elsewhere. Thus, zero sum game relative to government growth

-Geaux

Okay... so in Trumps (and apparently your) perfect world the federal government stays the same size in terms of expenditures as it is right now? You realize that entitlements are on automatic pilot (i.e. there are mandatory spending increases built into them)? so how does the Donald plan to deal with that ? Is he just going to tell all the entitlement recipients to go **** themselves and expect Congress to go along with it? Sounds like all Donald duck is proposing is to shuffle discretionary spending around with a net effect of government spending growing at its current clip + variable increases in debt service costs as interest rates rise.

As you can see it remains rather murky how the World according to Trump leads to the stated conservative goal of reducing the size of government.

Meh, we must first establish a baseline AFTER scrubbing the budget and reducing entitlements. SS in not one of them however. I propose we look into the social engineering equation relative to our budget and terminate them

Obamacare would be a good starting point

-Geaux

How exactly does Trump plan to "reduce entitlements" when entitlement increases are built in? Does Trump realize that entitlement recipients vote and that Congress Critters are aware of the fact that entitlement recipients vote? and what is his plan to deal with increasing debt service as interest rates return to historical norms?

As far as the "social engineering equation" to our budget goes, practically the entire federal government system of finance is based on social engineering.

 

[Geaux4it]

I do, that is why I'm bitching about Credit Card reform duh

We are against fiscal growth.

Cut the budget to pay for investments in our best interest

-Geaux

Uh-huh.. so if I got this straight, you want to "cut the budget" so their will be more money for the government to blow on other bullshit? and how does that shrink government exactly?

"Lucy you got some 'xplainin' to do"

My comments addressed the question in this thread that Trump wants to increase the size of Government. That is of course a flawed assumption. We depend on the government for National Security. That is one job they do well when managed effectively. Growing government equates to growing budget. To mitigate the increase, we cut elsewhere. Thus, zero sum game relative to government growth

-Geaux

Okay... so in Trumps (and apparently your) perfect world the federal government stays the same size in terms of expenditures as it is right now? You realize that entitlements are on automatic pilot (i.e. there are mandatory spending increases built into them)? so how does the Donald plan to deal with that ? Is he just going to tell all the entitlement recipients to go **** themselves and expect Congress to go along with it? Sounds like all Donald duck is proposing is to shuffle discretionary spending around with a net effect of government spending growing at its current clip + variable increases in debt service costs as interest rates rise.

As you can see it remains rather murky how the World according to Trump leads to the stated conservative goal of reducing the size of government.

Meh, we must first establish a baseline AFTER scrubbing the budget and reducing entitlements. SS in not one of them however. I propose we look into the social engineering equation relative to our budget and terminate them

Obamacare would be a good starting point

-Geaux

How exactly does Trump plan to "reduce entitlements" when entitlement increases are built in? Does Trump realize that entitlement recipients vote and that Congress Critters are aware of the fact that entitlement recipients vote? and what is his plan to deal with increasing debt service as interest rates return to historical norms?

As far as the "social engineering equation" to our budget goes, practically the entire federal government system of finance is based on social engineering.

We wont have to worry about the rise of interest rates until we elect a conservative POTUS

The FED has its hands tied with the floundering Obama economy

-Geaux

 

[Wildman]

what makes me angry??

SHIT LIKE THIS ! ! ! !
Black (nig-ger) activists unfurled an American flag on Sunday and stomped on it during multiple rallies for presidential hopeful Donald Trump in Wisconsin.
Read more at Black activists stomp U.S. flag at Trump rallies

 

[NightFox]

Uh-huh.. so if I got this straight, you want to "cut the budget" so their will be more money for the government to blow on other bullshit? and how does that shrink government exactly?

"Lucy you got some 'xplainin' to do"

My comments addressed the question in this thread that Trump wants to increase the size of Government. That is of course a flawed assumption. We depend on the government for National Security. That is one job they do well when managed effectively. Growing government equates to growing budget. To mitigate the increase, we cut elsewhere. Thus, zero sum game relative to government growth

-Geaux

Okay... so in Trumps (and apparently your) perfect world the federal government stays the same size in terms of expenditures as it is right now? You realize that entitlements are on automatic pilot (i.e. there are mandatory spending increases built into them)? so how does the Donald plan to deal with that ? Is he just going to tell all the entitlement recipients to go **** themselves and expect Congress to go along with it? Sounds like all Donald duck is proposing is to shuffle discretionary spending around with a net effect of government spending growing at its current clip + variable increases in debt service costs as interest rates rise.

As you can see it remains rather murky how the World according to Trump leads to the stated conservative goal of reducing the size of government.

Meh, we must first establish a baseline AFTER scrubbing the budget and reducing entitlements. SS in not one of them however. I propose we look into the social engineering equation relative to our budget and terminate them

Obamacare would be a good starting point

-Geaux

How exactly does Trump plan to "reduce entitlements" when entitlement increases are built in? Does Trump realize that entitlement recipients vote and that Congress Critters are aware of the fact that entitlement recipients vote? and what is his plan to deal with increasing debt service as interest rates return to historical norms?

As far as the "social engineering equation" to our budget goes, practically the entire federal government system of finance is based on social engineering.

We wont have to worry about the rise of interest rates until we elect a conservative POTUS

How do you figure that one? You expecting the world debt markets to suddenly start ignoring risk? or do you figure a "conservative" POTUS can just rely on the fed to continue to QE ad infinitum?

The FED has its hands tied with the floundering Obama economy

-Geaux

Ummm.. I hate to be the one to break this to you, but Trump's "plan" (along with every other candidates "plan") is nothing more than re-arranging the deck chairs on the titanic, because what is necessary to get the federal financial house in order is POLITICALLY UNFEASIBLE (for any POTUS), their only hope is to keep the party going on a little bit longer (preferably until they're out of office) but in the end there is only one "plan" and based on the current state of federal finances that "plan" is inevitable and it's called DEFAULT, we get to pick which flavor of default we prefer, default by proclamation or default by printing press.

Pulling the lever for the likes of Trump (or any of the other dickheads running for one of the two major party nominations) because you think he/she can "fix" the federal gub'mints finances by political means is just an unmistakable indication that you are gullible.

 

[Wildman]

oooooh!!! and don't any of you ******* America haters tell me it is "protected under the first amendment concerning free speech"!!!

................. S

 

[my2¢]

 

[jon_berzerk]

i am sorry you lost all validity with...i am still a cruz guy.....only thing trump has done is make cruz look like vivable choice......

This is all on Obama. Only can someone like Obama have created the mess we see. Of course, the most dysfunctional campaigns come at the heels of the first socialist POTUS

-Geaux

obama has little blame in this

in the past any old republican would do

but those days are gone after the people have been burned

too many times to trust these establishment progressives

and Cruz is just another one of them

 

[Wilbur Right]

How exactly does Trump plan to "reduce entitlements" when entitlement increases are built in? Does Trump realize that entitlement recipients vote and that Congress Critters are aware of the fact that entitlement recipients vote?

Not a problem. Trump is gonna fire all of congress.
And take.directions from Trumps Chumps.

 

[NightFox]

How exactly does Trump plan to "reduce entitlements" when entitlement increases are built in? Does Trump realize that entitlement recipients vote and that Congress Critters are aware of the fact that entitlement recipients vote?

Not a problem. Trump is gonna fire all of congress.
And take.directions from Trumps Chumps.

OIC, set Capital Hill on fire, blame it on illegal immigrants and Muslims, declare a state of emergency, suspend all civil liberties and declare himself dictator...... wait this story sounds familiar.

 

[paulitician]

Yeah, the usual suspects continue to attack Trump and his supporters for being angry. But the reality is, they have good reason to be angry. The corrupt Globalists who run the country, don't have American Citizens' best interests in mind. That's so obvious at this point. The People know what's going on. Trump genuinely cares about Americans. I'm really rootin for him.

 

[charwin95]

i am sorry you lost all validity with...i am still a cruz guy.....only thing trump has done is make cruz look like vivable choice......

This is all on Obama. Only can someone like Obama have created the mess we see. Of course, the most dysfunctional campaigns come at the heels of the first socialist POTUS

-Geaux

Why don't you leave California? Pick a red state.

Geaux can't leave Southern California because he is waiting for the new minimum wage increase to kick in.