American Muslims Stone Christians in Dearborn, MI

[Si modo]

Imagine walking into a Irish festival and carrying signs that read "jesus it a liar, false profit, murderer, child molester, pervert"


you would get one big beat down

Key differences here.

1. It was not a religious festival. It was public.

2. Those attackers would have been arrested.

....


This was inciting a riot.

....

Ipse dixit, but not according to the law.

That makes you a moron.

 

[Jos]

Personally, I think those who were violent should have been AT LEAST, cited for it.

Also, the cops have a duty to maintain the peace, so I applaud them for not making it worse.

Looks to me they were all minors

 

[Ravi]

Personally, I think those who were violent should have been AT LEAST, cited for it.

Also, the cops have a duty to maintain the peace, so I applaud them for not making it worse.

According to this article, some were:

The protests turned violent Sunday, and by the end of the day as many as 10 people facing disorderly conduct or assault charges,

Christian Taunts and Violence Mar Arab Festival in Michigan - ABC News

 

[Truthmatters]

Inciting a riot is not legal

 

[Si modo]

Personally, I think those who were violent should have been AT LEAST, cited for it.

Also, the cops have a duty to maintain the peace, so I applaud them for not making it worse.

Looks to me they were all minors

Great time to learn the law, then.

 

[Truthmatters]

It was inciting a riot

 

[Si modo]

It was inciting a riot

No it wasn't, at least according to the actual law.

Liar.

 

[Katzndogz]

Liberals will understand better when the person inciting a riot is a woman wearing a short skirt and red lipstick. Then it really will be a riot.

Here's a riot, 100 people died.

Down with beauty.

That's what's coming and what really incites a riot.

http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/100-die-nigerian-riot-over-miss-world-article

 

[High_Gravity]

It was inciting a riot

Why do you keep saying this?

 

[Si modo]

Personally, I think those who were violent should have been AT LEAST, cited for it.

Also, the cops have a duty to maintain the peace, so I applaud them for not making it worse.

According to this article, some were:

The protests turned violent Sunday, and by the end of the day as many as 10 people facing disorderly conduct or assault charges,

Christian Taunts and Violence Mar Arab Festival in Michigan - ABC News

Thanks for the info.

 

[Truthmatters]

Inciting a riot is illegal

 

[Buford]

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am among those who do not accept wiki as a primary source. Do you have any other secure source that can't be edited?

Well, you could just go to the citations and see for yourself if the wiki entry is accurate.

Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire

Text of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) is available from: Justia · Findlaw

"First Amendment Library entry on Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire".

I did. It is.

And I am a very lazy person.

That's fine. I'm even lazier when it comes to wiki.

 

[Ravi]

There's no evidence they were inciting a riot.

 

[High_Gravity]

Inciting a riot is illegal

Who was inciting a riot?

 

[Ravi]

I think we can all agree that the OP is either a liar or very stupid.

 

[Buford]

Aren't muslims the ones who threaten and murder people when they make fun of Mohammed? They must have learned that from the Christians, huh!

 

[Truthmatters]

the inqusition



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition#Purpose

 

[Si modo]

I am among those who do not accept wiki as a primary source. Do you have any other secure source that can't be edited?

Well, you could just go to the citations and see for yourself if the wiki entry is accurate.

Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire

Text of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) is available from: Justia · Findlaw

"First Amendment Library entry on Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire".

I did. It is.

And I am a very lazy person.

That's fine. I'm even lazier when it comes to wiki.

Well, I long ago stopped expecting folks at USMB to be logical, in general.

But, that doesn't keep me from pointing lack of logic out. When a person presents a source that another doesn't care for, they have met their burden. The burden now rests on the person disagreeing with the source to discredit it.

Unfortunately for you, others did YOUR burden for you - what wiki said about that ruling is what the ruling said.

 

[Jos]

 

[Katzndogz]

Christians can incite a muslim riot simply by being Christian.

We will learn, Sadly and harshly, we will learn.