Excellent question.There in only an armistice line that is specifically not to be a political or territorial boundary.
So officially it is the same country on both sides.
Who were the parties to the agreement?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Excellent question.There in only an armistice line that is specifically not to be a political or territorial boundary.
So officially it is the same country on both sides.
It's a hoot when your world-renowned studies in law can lead to such "official" determinations.Excellent question.There in only an armistice line that is specifically not to be a political or territorial boundary.
So officially it is the same country on both sides.
Sorry it went over your head.It's a hoot when your world-renowned studies in law can lead to such "official" determinations.
US says Israeli shot ‘likely responsible’ for death of Abu Akleh
It's a hoot when you can't find a silly youtube video dump in the forum.Sorry it went over your head.
US says Israeli shot ‘likely responsible’ for death of Abu Akleh
Shireen Abu Akleh's family rejects latest Israeli cover-up
Tel Aviv claims journalist's killing was an "unfortunate accident."electronicintifada.net
A photo of slain journalist Shireen Abu Akleh is placed on a chair as journalists wait for remarks by US President Joe Biden and Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas following their meeting in the occupied West Bank city of Bethlehem, 15 July.
Majdi Mohammed AP Photo
The family of Shireen Abu Akleh on Monday rejected the results of Israel’s official investigation into the slaying of the world-renowned Al Jazeera journalist.
Abu Akleh was fatally shot in the head in Jenin on 11 May, as she and other journalists were covering an Israeli army raid in the occupied West Bank city. Her colleague Ali al-Samoudi was shot in the back and injured.
“We could never expect any type of accountability or legitimate investigation from the very entity responsible for gunning down an unarmed and clearly identifiable journalist,” Lina Abu Akleh, the journalist’s niece said in a tweet sharing the family’s reaction.
Israel on Wednesday rejected the U.S. call for it to review the Israel Defense Forces' rules of engagement in the West Bank as part of accountability steps for the killing of Palestinian American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh.
State Department deputy spokesperson Vedant Patel said on Tuesday that the Biden administration will continue to press Israel “to closely review its policies and practices on rules of engagement” of the IDF in the occupied West Bank.
He said this is needed in order “to mitigate the risk of civilian harm, protect journalists and prevent similar tragedies."
Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid expressed "sorrow" over Abu Akleh's death on Wednesday but said "no one will dictate our rules of engagement to us, when we are the ones fighting for our lives."
Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz said that the "IDF’s chief of the general staff, and he alone, determines, and will continue to determine the rules of engagement in accordance with our operational needs and values of the IDF."
"These instructions are implemented in a strict manner by soldiers and their commanders. There has not been, and there will not be any political involvement in the matter," Gantz said.
Sure, we can stop them from mooching money.Is the US in a position to lecture Israel about rules of engagement and protecting journalists in wartime?
US says Israeli shot ‘likely responsible’ for death of Abu Akleh