So why are engineers subservient to capital?
Look, you're a troll. You came here to stir up trouble. You have no desire for reasoned discussion and lack the intellect to grasp rational responses.
Inventors create the value of investment, which is static and should be subservient.
I realize that you have little education and aren't very bright, but value is the offering of a thing that others are willing to trade effort or goods for in return.
Value is created only when goods or services are produced that others are willing to pay for. Much of the time, the creation of value is a cooperative proposition that requires capital backing.
Those who believe they have the business acumen to do so, raise capital on their own and start a business. Many others take the safer rout of selling their talents for a steady paycheck.
You make stupid claims such as the above, because no one has valued what you offer enough to pay you.
How much is an apple worth?
First, moving and changing companies is a traumatic experience. Second, they would come under the thumb of the same Investor Supremacists who think engineers should be subservient to them.
ROFL
What a ridiculous child you are. Most business in the United States is small business, run by people with less than 10 employees.
"Investor Supremacist" indeed.
Third, because companies are also in competition to see who can pay their employees the least, as in outsourcing and importing cheap foreign labor.
Companies are in competition to make the most profit, stupid. Talent is generally the basis of making a profit.
You're a dumb one, seriously.