You were raised to be one but you don't mention if you were ever a believer, Capstone. There is a difference. ...
I understand the difference, only too well.
The question as to what I might have
believed as a child has become increasingly complicated, as my understanding of epistemology has developed over the years. If you don't mind, that's a can of worms I'd rather not open in here.
Suffice it to say: I'm not a Pentecostal believer (or a Christian of any stripe) today.
I can sit in a garage all day but it won't make me a car either. Similar analogy. ...
No, but if you were to pay close enough attention, you might just become "intimately acquainted" with the comings and goings of that car and its drivers.
...I don't bring that up to dismiss your viewpoint on pentacostals but truly we are different from charismatic pentacostals who have now infiltrated some of the church with prosperity gospel. It is a different group. A true Pentacostal is not supposed to allow politics of any kind to enter the church. I can show you a sermon about it from the ministry I follow. It is considered a personal matter. Not for church discussion. That has changed. In the big evangelical churches many of them are becoming used for politics and it is a serious error in judgment. ...
Well, in spite of the doctrinal differences between the sects you've mentioned, the cross-denominational agreement as to the identity of "God's chosen people" and the consequent unwavering support for anything sold as "pro-Israeli" outside of the church ...fits my assessment to a T.
Case in point:
...With that said, I support Israel being a sovereign nation entitled to all the rights that other nations enjoy. This is my personal belief. As a christian I stand with the Jews and defend their right to keep Israel because God gave it to them and now it has been returned to them. ...
You've been herded into the pen right alongside all those crazy charismatics from whom you seem so anxious to distance yourself.
The conditioned acceptance of this divinely inspired
racial superiority of the Jews is so ingrained in the evangelical mindset that it can never be seen by the indoctrinated for what it is: the worst imaginable form of racism -- the kind that God "HIMSELF" has supposedly dictated!
The Jewish People are just that:
people. No better or worse than the people of any other ethnicity on the planet. Until that philosophy is widely reflected in Christian/Judeo religious thought, the policies that bloom as the natural fruition of such religion-based racism will likely continue to stain the Earth with the blood of whatever nations our leaders tell us are standing in the way of Israel's security.
On the matter of sharia banking. I do know that charging interest is forbidden. I can understand how this would be an obstacle for the IMF and World Bank Globalist Agenda. I also see how you can make the case for global conflict due to US foreign policy on Israel. Due to the fact that the enemies of the globalists are also the enemies of Israel. But is this a logical reason to walk away from Israel?
Perfectly logical, although maybe not morally justifiable in terms of abandoning the innocent Israelis. They're not all in on the globalist agenda, after all.
In my view, most Israelis are nearly as clueless as their unwitting supporters in the US, the main difference being: they're on the front-line of the globalists' phony war of attrition in the Middle East. This isn't about abandoning an ally; it's about liberating that pawn from the clutches of those who've misplayed it time and again over the past 60-odd years.