Allow me to make an audacious suggestion. Albeit one that's a bit tardy.

[berg80]

I can word it differently if you likeLowering taxes is the basis of lib objection to Reagan economic policy

I'm still waiting for you to substantiate any assertion you made.

 

[Nostra]

um because spending bills orginate in the House, always do. Trump you know, isn't in the House, and wasn't last year either

We have tried to educate that moron. It’s not taking.

Time to move on.

 

[Mac-7]

I'm still waiting for you to substantiate any assertion you made.

You mean change your mind do that you agree with me?

Its not worth my time to do that

I just tell you what I think and the rest is up to you

 

[Nostra]

how am I ignoring it? I literally addressed it, heck you obviously were unaware of it until we educated you on how budgets are passed.

I posted links documenting Reagan pushing for spending cuts, and Tip O’Neill refusing.

Not sure what clown thinks Reagan was supposed to do. Oh yeah, he thinks we have a King in the USA.

 

[Nostra]

Why, when this conversation comes up, do all maga fuckups cute that spending originates in the Hiuse?

Heil Shitler! owns this budget and you know it. What the hell was doge? Tariffs? We’re tariffs in Biden’s budget?

Yes or no?

So you claim Trump ran up Tater’s deficit by cutting spending with DOGE, and increasing revenues with his tarrifs.

I would like for someone here to explain the math on this. I have no idea how his math works.

 

[otto105]

You have your dates a little mixed up where Jackson is concerned

As for Smot-Hawley I dont know

It may have contributed to the slow recovery

But every country levies tariffs and has for several hundred years

Maybe past presidents should have imposed higher tariffs long before Trump came along

As well other measures to preserve our manufacturing base

If so its possible trump would never have run for president

Hilarious

Sorry, I was thinking of the McKinley Tariffs of 1890. The Jackson attempt was in the 1828s and failed too. McKinley for his part disavowed tariffs all together in 1893 after they failed.

Until the Shitlers! tariffs became a thing republic pols claimed that the Smot-Hawley tariffs deepened our downturn into a global depression.

That fact you don't know or won't post about to protect your maga standing is debatable.

 

[otto105]

So you claim Trump ran up Tater’s deficit by cutting spending with DOGE, and increasing revenues with his tarrifs.

I would like for someone here to explain the math on this. I have no idea how his math works.

Why does the big brutal bill include a 5 trillion-dollar debt ceiling increase?

Ya know, if the math works...

 

[Mac-7]

Hilarious

Sorry, I was thinking of the McKinley Tariffs of 1890. The Jackson attempt was in the 1828s and failed too. McKinley for his part disavowed tariffs all together in 1893 after they failed.

Until the Shitlers! tariffs became a thing republic pols claimed that the Smot-Hawley tariffs deepened our downturn into a global depression.

That fact you don't know or won't post about to protect your maga standing is debatable.

Tariffs are not something new invented by trump

Practically every nation levies tariffs

 

[Man With A Plan]

Do you also oppose right wing violence?

There’s plenty of it

Really? Would you like to list all of the right wing violence that's taken place because of the Kirk assassination? Then we can compare THAT to the violence that's taken place in cities around the country in response to illegals being deported!

 

[Nostra]

Why does the big brutal bill include a 5 trillion-dollar debt ceiling increase?

Ya know, if the math works...

I knew you couldn’t explain it.


Dismissed.

 

[berg80]

You mean change your mind do that you agree with me?

Its not worth my time to do that

I just tell you what I think and the rest is up to you

Gosh, you're such a coward. You refuse to post any factual info you believe supports your assertion. I suspect because you know I'll shred it. Or because there is none.

 

[Nostra]

Blotto105 Economic equation:

More Revenue + Less spending = Higher deficits.

 

[otto105]

I knew you couldn’t explain it.


Dismissed.

Dude, you asked about the math.

Is our current deficit increasing or decreasing? The federal deficit in 2024 was 1.8 trillion. Thats your bar.

 

[otto105]

Blotto105 Economic equation:

More Revenue + Less spending = Higher deficits.

Nostral math"

1.8 trillion is greater than 2.0+ trillion.

 

[Mac-7]

Gosh, you're such a coward. You refuse to post any factual info you believe supports your assertion. I suspect because you know I'll shred it. Or because there is none.

You want me to play Go-Fetch with you but I have better things to do

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Mac1958 has found an acorn

Since Reagan and before Trump all the presidents were losers who were bad for America

I would worry if lib fence jockys like mac1958 were praising trump

You don't praise a criminal orange bag O' shit.

 

[Mac-7]

You don't praise a criminal orange bag O' shit.

I have not seen the nightly news today

How is trump a criminal?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

What would you call a movement that sets fire to Teslas and murders conservative leaders like Charlie Kirk?

.

Last week.

.

 

[otto105]

I have not seen the nightly news today

How is trump a criminal?

Just 34x.

Do you under a maga rock in a silo?

 

[Mac-7]

Just 34x.

Do you under a maga rock in a silo?

If you say so

Im not aware of any serious crimes that trump is guilty of


Btw: all hail Tommy Robinson and Nigel Farage!